1
   

Bush Sr. killed John F. Kennedy...

 
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 11:41 am
I always thought J Edgar offed Kennedy because he was the only thing in a dress Kennedy wouldn't f*ck......
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 12:00 pm
What makes you think he didn't . . . hmmmmm?
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 12:40 pm
No aliens? I thought it was aliens who escaped in a UFO.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 12:48 pm
Yeah, you guys are probably right - after all, if Oswald didn't act alone and someone else was involved, it doesn't really matter in the scheme of things anyway, unless you believe in lame notions like corruption in our upstanding capatilist society.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 01:46 pm
snood wrote:
Well, have your yoks fellas, but I and millions of others will always believe that Oswald didn't act alone, and that the evidence bears that out.


Snood, I don't necessarily disagree with you at all. My reaction was to this particular cpnspiracy theory and the linked film clip. That Oswald -- if he had anything to do with the assasination at all -- had help is pretty definitely suggested by all the evidence I've seen. I'm still chuckling about Pappy Bush, though. I mean, I know the Bush family is pretty despicable. I've voted against both Bushes every time either one ran for the Oval Office. But are we really runing out of genuine topics of criticism to have to come up with this drivel?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 02:49 pm
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
I always thought J Edgar offed Kennedy because he was the only thing in a dress Kennedy wouldn't f*ck......

If we were giving out points, Bear would have one for this.

LOL!!!!
0 Replies
 
DESooner
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Oct, 2005 06:04 pm
Re: Bush Sr. killed John F. Kennedy...
Black Krishna wrote:

1. Pressy was arrested by J. Edgar Hoover in 1942 as CEO of Union Bank for trading with the Nazi's... and still didn't stop until 1951.


Nazis lost the war and fell from power in 1945 - yet Pressy was trading with them from '46 to '51? Pretty resourceful, but doubtful....

Black Krishna wrote:

He was a tire-salesman who got his first investment job with his father-in-law, Averill Harriman, and they both did regular business with the first head of the CIA, Allen Dulles, who in turn had helped them hide funding of Hitler's rise to power.


The CIA was formed after WWII. The OSS had charge in intelligence operations throughout WWII, but yet you say the CIA funded Hitler's rise? Hitler rose to power in post WWI Europe....tricky CIA they are to fund something before they came into existence...

Black Krishna wrote:


Lee Harvey Oswald was his best asset, and a double-agent for the CIA and FBI; he had announced he was a traitor when he went to Russia, then later came back and worked with both.


I realize this isn't your work, but I would want to see a source for this statement. I have read alot on LHO, and nothing I have ever read from any source suggests any contact between any US agencies and LHO post-Russia.


Black Krishna wrote:

7. JFK was assasinated on November 22, 1963. Poppy, Hunt, and Nixon all gave inconsistent reports where they were when they heard he got shot each time they were interviewed for several years; witnesses were killed; and various cover-ups ensued.


Let's assume you are 40 years old now. If so, tell us where you were on July 13, 1987....

Black Krishna wrote:

10. What about Dubya? Well... rumour was JFK Jr. was looking into who killed his Dad with more interest... he was a handsome young member of an American Dynasty settling down ....


Just by virtue of the fact they decided to use the modifier 'handsome' discredits this entire point for me....why not just stick to young member? The Kennedy's get so many breaks and passes because of their 'Irish American rugged good looks' - anyone recall how that American Dynasty was built?

Black Krishna wrote:

Do you think this evidence is too weak?


Very.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Oct, 2005 07:39 pm
snood wrote:
Well, have your yoks fellas, but I and millions of others will always believe that Oswald didn't act alone, and that the evidence bears that out.


The evidence does NOT bear that out. Forensic science can prove that it is possible to have been done by one man and one alone.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Oct, 2005 07:42 pm
I used to be a conspiracy buff however, the more I read about it the more I think that at the heart of it, the WC report was right. Perhaps some information was supressed or messed up but the bottom line remains the same; I think Oswald did it. Why? That I have no clue and no one ever will I suspect.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 04:47:37