CRIMINAL LAW is NOT DETERMINATIVE of HUMAN CONDUCT.

CRIMINAL LAW is NOT DETERMINATIVE of HUMAN CONDUCT. CRIMINAL LAW EXAMINED in the LIGHT of the ACTUAL HUMAN ONTOLOGICAL MODE of ORIGINATION of ACTION/INACTION . PROLEGOMENA to ANOTHER APPROACH TO CIVILIZATION via ESTABLISHING ALL PERSONS as REFLECTIVELY FREE.

Neither citizens, nor magistrates, or police, nor prosecutorial officers, nor jurors, determine themselves to originate an act against, or for another person, on the basis of given criminal law; nor is anyone cinesiologically moved to act, nor to decline to act, by published language of criminal law.
The above statement surely appears to be absurd and nonsensical in this day and age, wherein law is historically deemed to be a supreme movent efficacy and, a radically powerful and indubitable determinative force; —nonetheless, recent scholarly reflection has realized that all human determination to act, or to decline to act, arises solely on the basis of purely absent/non-existing intended states of affairs, and not on the basis of given/existing states of affairs, and, law is a given extant state of affairs.
Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677) gave us “...determinatio negatio est…”’ (determination is negation); George W. Hegel (1770-1831) posited “Omnis determinatio est negatio.” (All determination is negation.); J.P. Sartre (1905-1980), wrote “No factual state whatever it may be (the political and economic structure of society, the psychological “state”, etc.) is capable by itself of motivating any act whatsoever. For an act is a projection of the self toward what is not, and what is can in no way determine by itself what is not.” (Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Jean-Paul Sartre. 1956. Hazel E. Barnes.)
A world inhabited by reflectively free persons will be the sphere of a totally new and different mode of civilization, wherein human ontological freedom is reflectively understood and freely practiced.
To be reflectively free is to understand that no given state of affairs whatsoever can possibly be determinative of a human act. It is to understand the doubly nihilitive originative mode of human action.
Living ontologically accurately/authentically is the basis of constructing a brand new ilk of free human civilization. The universal attempt to mediate and control human conduct by endlessly publishing/enforcing an infinite language of law, is actually ontologically impossible; for human ontological freedom is prior to, independent of, and, determinative of law, not the other way around; and, because determination upsurges as negation, not via given law, Law is not and cannot possibly be originative/determinative of human action or inaction. It is radically mistaken/illusional to deem man made law to be determinative of man’s conduct.
Human freedom can only be controlled by the individual human being in possession thereof, and not by the Other, who would dictate divers predetermined courses of conduct via a language of law. Hence, all persons require being educated to the point of possessing a reflective comprehension of the nihilitive mode of operation of their own ontological freedom, in order that they may both more forcefully assert that freedom and, more efficiently self-control personal freedom.
Our present radically evil and unethical habits of incessantly doing rampant anti-social misconduct and, ever mushrooming murderous conduct, is the practico inert resultant of our stupid vain attempt to subjugate, submerge, control and determine human conduct via an anti-ontological and ontologically incorrect language of law. We humans have so long and so thoroughly inadvertently lawfully striven against our very own ontological being, that we are become radically deviant violent miscreants, blindly assailing each other and lashing-out against the humanly created anti-ontological and anti-human legalistic sociosphere.
The tacit claim which police, prosecutorial officers, and magistrates continually make, i.e., that they act against persons by and on the basis of law, is ontologically impossible, untrue, and hence, unethical.
The radically miserable current state of affairs wherein civilization is now drowning in overwhelming sociopathic/murderous rampant crime, is, ironically, ascribable to our constituting, against ourselves, and against our very being, law; – for law is a construct which assails and inadvertantly attempts to alienate and overthrow the most fundamental operative structure of our human ontological freedom, which primally rudimentary ontological operative structure is what is known, since 1943, as the “double nihilation”.
“Nihilation’’ means to constitute, to make, nothing.
Nihilation* is the conscious human act of imagining one’s intention to do a particular overt act in future, and, hence, the intended act, which is not yet, is negative in structure as a nothing; a non-being; an absence; a desideratum; a nothingness. Every intentional human act originates in a two part negation or negative movement, known as ‘’ double nihilation’’, wherein what is intended is, as yet, nothing, and, wherein one’s present state of affairs is transcended and made nothing/no longer/non-existent, by doing/realizing the intended state of affairs. Such is the doubly negative conscious movement whereby a human act upsurges into the world, and, wherein nothing whatsoever which exists (e.g., law), other than the imagining intentional consciousness doing the nihilation, participates.
When a one attains to understanding the nihilational structure of the origination of a human act, one is become “reflectively free”**, i.e., one knows how one’s acts arise via the conscious process of creating both the nothing that is the intended future and, the nothing which is the transcended past.
It is by gaining reflectively free citizens that we begin to thoughtfully transcend our existing, crippled, anti-ontological/anti-human, wrongfully crime-producing, law-oriented civilization; and, whereby citizens will no longer uphold the dishonest myth maintained by legislators, magistrates, police and prosecutorial officers, that their constant actions against the citizenry are justly determined, predicated upon, and mediated by existing language of law.

*A term coined by J.P. Sartre meaning to make nothing.
** A Sartreian phrase.