Yep. Your OP is babble.
now you claim you have not been addressing my writing
This claim is misleadingly non-specific. Specifically, I said I wasn't addressing either the logic nor the content....I was addressing your expectations, your communication style, and human motivation. What motive do you have for being misleadingly non-specific?
You disagree with everything I mention
Not true. I've said many times I have no position on your 'treatise'. What motivation do you have for not noting/understanding (take your pick) what I've said multiple times?
you are absolutely incapable of writing point blank disagreement with the original post which I have submitted
I said multiple times I couldn't care less what your original post says. What motivation do you have for not noting/understanding (take your pick) what I've said multiple times?
I've spelt all of the above out in very specific, very black and white terms. You could ask yourself why even now, you keep wanting to misread / misinterpret what I've said. Continually misinterpreting black and white writing is illogical is it not? But as I said, human motivation has very little to do with logic.