1
   

Should we handle victory the way the Christian god decrees?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 06:59 pm
There's a whole lot of "agree to disagree" by one poster on this forum. There might be a hint at something there, but it's only obvious to some people only.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 07:23 pm
C.I.,

It's called an amicable compromise. No harm, no foul. No one wins. We agree to just disagree. Do you have a problem with that?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 07:24 pm
Why should I? I'm only an observer with an opinion.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 07:37 pm
Uh, ok. I was just asking. Confused
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 07:48 pm
Momma- I cannot simply "agree to disagree" until you explain the inconsistency in what you say, and what you do.

Be honest. You are lobbying for a law based on nothing but your scriptural teachings. If you say, "It is because I believe in the issue", I don't buy that. I think that you would follow the scriptures, without a thought about it, (and use "faith" as the rationale).

If you really "loved the sinner" as you put it, you would not try and impede him in living his life his way. According to what you maintain, you would leave it to God to deal with the sinner.

You can say that you don't want a theocracy, until the cows come home, but IMO your actions say otherwise.

Explain to me why you think I am wrong, convince me, and THEN I will agree to disagree.
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 08:10 pm
I agree with Momma's position, and will be happy to engage, but could we do it in another thread? 85 pages and counting on a totally unrelated thread.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 08:32 pm
slkshock7,

I could sure use your help here. I don't know how to explain it in any other way than I have.

Phoenix,

What do you say? Would you mind slkshock7 helping me out on this one?

Momma Angel
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 03:22 am
slkshock7 wrote:
I agree with Momma's position, and will be happy to engage, but could we do it in another thread? 85 pages and counting on a totally unrelated thread.


If you want to start another thread on this subject, Shock...please do...and put a link here so we can all move over there.

But do not worry about using this one if you don't want to. We've pretty much finished up business on my original question.

I don't think anyone is suggesting that we follow the god of the Bible's advice on how to conduct ourselves after victory in a war.

Interesting that...wouldn't you say?

(And I am looking forward to you take on Phoenix's question! I'm sure I will get involved, because I agree with her on this.)
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 04:20 am
Momma Angel wrote:
What do you say? Would you mind slkshock7 helping me out on this one?


I would certainly appreciate slkshock7's opinion on the matter. But my first, (and continuing) request is for your explanation. It seems to me that when one has a belief that is so strong, and when apparently there are major contradictions in the belief, the person ought to have thought them through, and be able to verbalize how he came to his conclusions.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 10:55 am
Phoenix Wrote:

Quote:
I would certainly appreciate slkshock7's opinion on the matter. But my first, (and continuing) request is for your explanation. It seems to me that when one has a belief that is so strong, and when apparently there are major contradictions in the belief, the person ought to have thought them through, and be able to verbalize how he came to his conclusions.


Phoenix, I understand what you are saying here. However, I feel that I have answered your question more than once. To you, there is a contradiction, and yes, I even understand how you may feel that way. But, if one does not have the same "belief", "faith", etc., it sometimes cannot be explained to another person's understanding or even satisfaction.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 11:20 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Phoenix Wrote:

Quote:
I would certainly appreciate slkshock7's opinion on the matter. But my first, (and continuing) request is for your explanation. It seems to me that when one has a belief that is so strong, and when apparently there are major contradictions in the belief, the person ought to have thought them through, and be able to verbalize how he came to his conclusions.


Phoenix, I understand what you are saying here. However, I feel that I have answered your question more than once. To you, there is a contradiction, and yes, I even understand how you may feel that way. But, if one does not have the same "belief", "faith", etc., it sometimes cannot be explained to another person's understanding or even satisfaction.


Well...that may be true, MA...but it is also possible that the contradictions remain and that the explanation really doesn't make sense, because the "explanation" is not really and explanation, but rather an attempt to make the unexplainable seem like it has been explained.

I think both Phoenix and I are trying to get past the fact that you often attempt to make it our "fault" (for want of a better word)...when you, or some other religious person, gets caught up in obvious contradictions...by saying "well, you just don't have faith, therefor you don't get it."

I suspect, she, like I....think you very often are the one "not getting it"....and I suspect she, like I, think it is because you have this "faith"...which really is little more than an insistence that you are correct despite the fact that you don't truly know that you are.

Faith...or lack of it...may indeed be the key ingredient. But you just have to understand that you...and your possession of it....may be the problem. Not "the lack of it"...or those of us who do not have it.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 11:36 am
Frank Apisa Wrote:

Quote:
Well...that may be true, MA...but it is also possible that the contradictions remain and that the explanation really doesn't make sense, because the "explanation" is not really and explanation, but rather an attempt to make the unexplainable seem like it has been explained.

I think both Phoenix and I are trying to get past the fact that you often attempt to make it our "fault" (for want of a better word)...when you, or some other religious person, gets caught up in obvious contradictions...by saying "well, you just don't have faith, therefor you don't get it."

I suspect, she, like I....think you very often are the one "not getting it"....and I suspect she, like I, think it is because you have this "faith"...which really is little more than an insistence that you are correct despite the fact that you don't truly know that you are.

Faith...or lack of it...may indeed be the key ingredient. But you just have to understand that you...and your possession of it....may be the problem. Not "the lack of it"...or those of us who do not have it.


First, let me say this, Frank. I love reading posts like this from you. I read it and I retain and understand them so much more, and for that I do sincerely thank you.

And I must say, point well spoken and very well taken. And yes, perhaps it does seem that I was putting the blame on Phoenix and others for not understanding. I apologize for making that seem the case.

So, I propose this, Phoenix, slkshock7, Frank and any others that would care to engage: Let's start a new thread. Phoenix, can you post the question? I don't mind if you give a brief overview of what we have discussed and use Momma (lol) as an example of what you are trying to do? I really feel I can't explain any better than I have and I don't want to dodge your question. I would like to answer it to your satisfaction.

So, what's say everyone? Shall we?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 11:41 am
Another suggestion from Momma - like she can't do it herself? LOL She does love to give other people directions.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 11:46 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
Another suggestion from Momma - like she can't do it herself? LOL She does love to give other people directions.


C'mon, ci....MA is making a sincere guesture to move a particular discussion along.

Tell ya what...I ask that a new thread be started on it also.

If Phoenix would like to do it, fine. If not...I'll make an attempt to consolidate the discussion thus far on the issue and start the thread myself.

Phoenix???
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 12:45 pm
Frank Apisa Wrote:

Quote:
C'mon, ci....MA is making a sincere guesture to move a particular discussion along.

Tell ya what...I ask that a new thread be started on it also.

If Phoenix would like to do it, fine. If not...I'll make an attempt to consolidate the discussion thus far on the issue and start the thread myself.

Phoenix???


Frank, I'd kiss you if you were here! Laughing
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 12:54 pm
You are one brave woman, MA
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 12:55 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Another suggestion from Momma - like she can't do it herself? LOL She does love to give other people directions.


Now be nice CI.... she does make a contribution rather than just tag along on others posts as some do :wink:
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 01:06 pm
Intrepid Wrote:

Quote:
You are one brave woman, MA


Don't know about brave, Intrepid. But, I think Frank is making a very sincere effort here and Phoenix, though we have differing views, has been quite civil. I may not ever be able to explain this to their satisfaction, but I do feel they deserve the courtesy of my trying. So, I sure could use your input in that new thread! :wink:

And don't worry about C.I., as long as he's here, he can learn just like the rest of us. (Though I do appreciate your support!) Kisses!
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 01:13 pm
Frank- I think that I would like to give it a shot. I would like to couch the thread in general terms, because I think that the issue concerns a very basic question that impacts on many different areas of life.

I believe that there are very basic differences between how the religious and the non-religious process information concerning how we as humans need to relate to the world. I would like to explore those differences.

I will put on my thinking cap, and hopefully come up with a thread that is interesting and provocative.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Aug, 2005 01:29 pm
You go Phoenix!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 5.45 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 04:01:14