0
   

T vs R (2)

 
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2022 05:53 pm
Secret lab vs secret lavatory, touchy and feely

If a guy feels this thread is like a “secret” lab, he can take away the “experimental data”. They are free;
If a guy feels this thread is like a “secret” lavatory, he can “poop” here in the pubic too. It’s free. Piggy really has no idea how to stop that kind of ugly behavior.
If a “secret agent” stole “experimental data” while “poop” in the lab, it’s immoral. But piggy doesn’t think there is the word of “morality” in the dictionary of a “secret agent”. Haha

Please don’t relate piggy with that wasp / bully bully. It’s absolutely an obscure conspiracy. Piggy has no relation with that wasp / bully bully any more. Piggy now even is reluctant to talk anything with that guy.

Wasp, “lobotomised” donkey, T – 33 coffin cover, now a “secret agent”… all **** to sabotage normal scientific research again and again. Piggy has to step on their **** and marches ahead…It’s a shame in the history of science.
Piggy expects such abnormal incident would happen again and again. Which galaxy the First Order attacks, there would be no normal life there.
http://5b0988e595225.cdn.sohucs.com/images/20180420/e3f14ee67e554de3acedf90b132c8b71.gif

Next go on with normal scientific research.
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2022 06:03 pm
The stuff of “unilateral conception of field vs the bilateral conception of field” was a bit rough and chaotic ahead, because that’s real time research and in urgent time.
Now piggy reorganized a part of those stuff and repeats them here for reference to those guys who are willing to touch the elephant in an alternative angle.

The magnitude of electric force for point charge in classical electromagnetism is F = KQq / r².
The intensity of electric field for point charge in classical electromagnetism is E = KQ / r².
(The upper letter “K” is the electric constant.)

We transform the equation F = KQq / r² in math.
Let K = K1 K2
Then the electric force formula can be transformed as F = (K1Q / r) × (K2q / r)
(Note: the symbol “×” means multiply only here.)

At this moment, smart guys who are sensitive in physics would be aware of this point: there might be two conceptions for the intensity of electric field.
So, we initiate the unilateral conception of field E = KQ / r² as well as the bilateral conception of field E = K1Q / r or E = K2q / r.

In unilateral conception of field: F = (KQ / r²) × q
It means field deals with particle.

In bilateral conception of field: F = (K1Q / r) × (K2q / r) = E1 × E2
It means field deals with field.

I supposes in unilateral conception of field, the electric constant should be denoted with upper letter K, while in bilateral conception of field, the electric constant should be denoted with lower letter k. K = k².

Then,
In unilateral conception of field, electric force F = (KQ / r²) × q;
In bilateral conception of field, electric force F = (K1Q / r) × (K2q / r) = (kQ / r) × (kq / r)

In unilateral conception of field, intensity of electric field E = KQ / r²
In bilateral conception of field, intensity of electric field E = kQ / r or E = kq / r

(The math here is simple. Even a schoolboy can understand it well. But it can expand human’s thought. Piggy thinks these two conceptions of field are meaningful in theoretical physics. But some specific problems are destined to be solved by bilateral conception of field, piggy guesses.)

Have a lovely day, guys.
http://5b0988e595225.cdn.sohucs.com/images/20180819/e1b45adc9e3a45b683e3c2bdd7b5be2d.jpeg
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2022 06:11 pm
Piggy always consider such research as “the mass – space equation”, “analysis of the speed of probability wave”, “what’s meant by the amplitude of wave function in QM”, “unilateral conception of field vs bilateral conception of field”, etc, are epoch making affairs in science.

The “authentic” scientific community might be really “obsolete”, “no save”. Perhaps even G* is not able to pull it out of the mud pit. They are “heavy accumulated and hard to go back”.

In the other hand, too many guys drunk on delusion and emit fringe ideas / DREAM. Seldom guys are really willing to engage in real learning. It’s a tough job.

Piggy is working on the 3D space unit charge model and the amendment of the 4D space version.
Really has no spare time to argue with who.

If somebody here wants a newest version of “analysis of the speed of probability wave”, he can contact piggy in PM. Of course, piggy has to know his identification.

http://www.newxue.com/picture/gyja/paojjl1.jpg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
  1. Forums
  2. » T vs R (2)
  3. » Page 5
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/27/2022 at 05:33:35