History vs development 3, touchy and feely
As piggy said once upon a time, in the thread “T vs R” that “At least there were 10×10×10×10 philosophers, physicists, mathematicians, poets, and even unknown ordinary people believed that everything in this cosmos is INTERCONNECTED or say sciences are all INTERCONNECTED hundreds of years ago. Piggy guesses. But up to this day, nobody can DESCRIBE it in one physics theory.
The key is how to do it and who can do it.”
Piggy really doesn’t know how can the “quark” theory INTERCONNECT with Relativity.
Piggy’s physics model can INTERCONNECT with Relativity, QM, classical electromagnetism, particle physics, cosmology, etc. There are many “coincidence” in all territories.
Nowadays, those guys of the so called “authentic” / “standard” community are lack of the research in respect of the first fundamental natural system (the PRESENCE – PROPERTY system). That means their cognition about nature at most can reach half part.
The fact is that a “standard” rabbit has a short tail as its inherent property. Just the rabbit is habitual to ignore it, perhaps because it’s too short. Haha
Piggy really doesn’t know how the internal energy deposits in a “quark” in their theory. An abstract “mass point” has true energy? Really very “standard”. Haha
If the elementary particles have no shape and size, where do the macroscopic conceptions of shape and size come from? Logic confused?
Actually, piggy’s physics model, as piggy has illustrated in other threads, the model of elementary particle, the model of released photon, the model of neutrino, the new “inward Hydrogen atom” model of neutron, has provided a new method to research the particle physics in the new era of PRESENCE - PROPERTY.
Even kids have changed their toys from 1G mobile phone to 4 or 5 G over the past ten plus years. Piggy feels history is developing very fast except physics and religion.
Have a lovely day, guys.