Scientist vs gangster, touchy and feely
According to the statement in “authentic” QM textbook, once upon a time, when people knew released photon is “wavicle”, Duc de Broglie initiated a genius – rated ASSUMPTION “all micro particles should be wavicle”. Then, the conception of “matter wave” / probability wave appeared on the stage of physics.
In philosophy it equals to “the father pig is a good swimmer, then, the little piggy should be a good swimmer too”. Gangster’s logic. Oh Lord, please don’t throw the little piggy into water to do experiment…
Again, piggy says that at Duc de Brogiel’s era, people weren’t yet AWARE of the (effect of) PRESENCE (matter state).
Now in the new era of PRESENCE – PROPERTY, piggy’s physics model of elementary particle and released photon as well as the conception of “electric wave” have explicitly demonstrated why released photon is “wavicle” while electron is not.
In piggy’s Physics Model of elementary particle, elementary particles can be divided into two big categories depending on matter state:
Matter state 1: Spherical electromagnetic wave. It’s the physics model for such elementary particles as electron, proton, etc. Such elementary particles do not demonstrate wave characteristic as a whole.
Matter state 2: A section of electromagnetic wave travels in straight line in the speed of light c. It is the physics model of a released photon. Of course it’s “wavicle”. Wave is electromagnetic wave while particle is “a section”.
A significant affair is it successfully explained two hard problems in “analysis of the speed of probability wave”:
What does the inconformity between “v” and “u” in case of 0 ＜ v ＜ c mean exactly in physics? It represents the wave state separating from the particle state? How lame it all sound. It’s too abstract and not understandable. It just means the concept of wavicle in QM can’t establish in this situation.
What does the conformity between “v” and “u” in case of “v → c, Lim u = c” mean exactly in physics? It should mean the concept of wavicle established in this situation. Why?
After touchy and feely for one century, human at last make clear Duc de Broglie’s original idea, the frequency of matter / probability wave γ = E / h, the wavelength of matter / probability wave λ = h / p actually should be to DESCRIBE “electric wave”. Very fun…
Duc de Broglie + htam = flawless physics