Merry Andrew wrote:Jovana, I have gotten through cancer, clean. I have also overcome my alcoholism. What is your point? Simply labeling an alcoholic as 'morally weak' or 'lacking will-power' in no way helps that person. In fact, the trick is to convince the drunk or drug addict that he/she is not a bad person who wants to be good, but, rather, a sick person who should strive to get well.
And, btw, is there some reason why you wish to be insulting to foxfyre?
I stand by my comments to which I am tired of hearing drug addicts and alcoholics who have devastasted the people around them with self-inflicted bad behavior patting themselves on the backs as if they accomplished some sort of miracle worthy of an award.
Like other drugs, we all know that there is a high probability of addiction if one overindulges. In addition, I am giving more credit than you realize. I am also making the assumption based on the comments posted, that these people are fairly intelligent. Intelligent people know when they are behaving badly, getting close to crossing a line, and then crossing a line into a point of no return. It's like heroin. There is a very high probability as reported that even just trying it once, there is a good chance of addiction. So why do it in the first place?
I don't believe I am insulting. I am merely stating my opinion that Alcholism is not a "disease". It is an out of control habit. And that I find Dr. Ameisen's report ridiculous. He traded one drug for another.
And if I sound insulting, I apologize. I just am tired of hearing and reading about this "disease" that isn't really a "disease". We all know smoking is addictive and causes devastation to the body and those around us. So why even start? The same goes with alcohol.