Re: Dealing with a Clam
flushd wrote:I always seem to choose men who clam up at the most annoying moments.
Example: I bring up something that is not acceptable to me, he clams up and acts all hurt.
We end up not seeing each other for a while because he won't talk about it, and I am now too pissed off to just carry on like usual. I refuse to snivel and whine to try and make him 'get it'. It seems to me he just runs away when it gets too uncomfy.
I don't know how to deal with this passive-aggressive crap.
I am assertive (read: sometimes aggressive) and I just say whatever I need to say.
I only bring up things that he could reasonably alter; and they are open to discussion.
Relationships require communicate and there are blips along the way.
I listen to his 'complaints'.
I love my bf, but I have thought of leaving him because of this.
It feels like he is continually disregarding my needs, because of his 'sensitivity'.
He says he likes that i'm a little aggressive and 'take charge', but I want him to stand up and work with me. I don't want to 'wear the pants' , I want a partnership that is equal.
Is there hope here, or am I trying to change a man stupidly?
Flush'd, you sound a lot like you could be my twin, bec. I, too, am assertive and "take charge," and yet, in a relationship with a guy, I like for him to exercise proper leadership (which means not domineering, but still "steering"). I want a captain-shepherd. I have dated the type of guy you're talking about, and they don't change, at least not that I've ever seen in my own experience or in the lives of friends/family where a guy like that is in the picture.
For some reason, often the non-leader type of guy gravitates toward our type. (Security? Laziness? "Opposites attract"?) But invariably, we get frustrated with their lethargy and they get frustrated with our "pushiness" or "demanding nature."
Have you noticed this?: The guys who're leaders are usually not cherishers (sigh...) and vice-versa. I have always wished there were a Guy-Depot type store, where you could buy all the parts (inside and out) for exactly the type of guy you want, then build-him-yourself.
Short of that, I reckon it's just plain old "settle." It seems like the key is: no guy's going to be perfect, so as you look at guy X, are his positives a strong enough trade-off for his negatives? Also, can you live with the negatives "till death do you part"? (Bec. as an older married woman once told me, "the negatives you see now will only get magnified as you live with them day in, day out, year after year.")
As one of my guy buddies (a colleague and friend) used to say: "Marriage is not for the fainthearted." It's hard work, day in and day out, bec. there's the constant need to put the other person first. Question is: do you consider him worth it?
Dunno if any of this helps. Wish you the best as you try to resolve it.
PS: I sublet a room for almost 7 years from a woman who was a case of me "to the 10th exponent" and her husband who was a soggy bowl of cornflakes. She had married him when she was still in the throes of depression about her first husband leaving her (with 3 little kids and no way of making a living). After another year or 2, the depression lifted, and then, she realized what a HUGE mistake she had made, but they're both committers, so they have stuck it out.
But let me tell you, every single day that I lived with them, I was sooooo thankful that I wasn't married. Their marriage was even worse than my parents'. She kept TRYING and TRYING to transform him into her image (even in her early 60's, when they had been married for almost 30 years), and he just kept digging in his heels more and more, and the more he did, the more she prodded. It was a HORRIBLE vicious circle. A mini-hell.
My point is, I'd hate to see you in that kind of condition.