8
   

Fitzgerald Investigation of Leak of Identity of CIA Agent

 
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Oct, 2005 02:54 pm
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 09:26 am
If this turns out to be true, it is interesting. Maybe the reason why the opinion columnists are not commenting is because they don't want to come out on one side or the other until/if an indictment is made and it is their company that is tied up in this. This is one investigation that has not been driven by the drum beat of the media to say the least.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 09:33 am
NEWSMAN SEES PLAME DANGER TO BUSH

Monday, October 10, 2005 - FreeMarketNews.com

Until recently it seemed as though the alternative Internet press was the only segment of the media questioning how far up the Bush administration chain of command the fallout from the Valerie Plame-CIA leak investigation would travel. Now longtime CBS and NPR correspondent Daniel Schorr has asked the same question in a recent Christian Science Monitor column.

Suprisingly, Schorr's view seems to be that not even President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are necessarily safe, as Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald attempts to unravel the twisted story of who knew what and when, regarding Valerie Plame, Judith Miller and the rest.

Schorr relates the history of the whole odd, tangled affair, from Nigerian uranium allegations, to Robert Novak's outing of Plame as a CIA undercover operative, to the cover-ups that are apparently underway. He closes by reminding readers: "It may be remembered that the Watergate grand jury wanted to indict President Nixon for obstruction of justice. When advised that a sitting president could not be prosecuted, the grand jury named him as an un-indicted co-conspirator."
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Oct, 2005 11:28 am
James Dobson to clarify info
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/state/article/0,1299,DRMN_21_4148655,00.html
James Dobson to clarify info
Focus on the Family founder will talk on radio about Miers
By M.E. Sprengelmeyer, Rocky Mountain News
October 11, 2005

WASHINGTON - Focus on the Family founder James Dobson will take to the airwaves Wednesday and Thursday to clarify what information he got from the White House or other sources about U.S. Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers.

Dobson has faced a barrage of media attention in recent days because he has tentatively endorsed Miers just as other conservatives or evangelical Christian leaders have expressed doubts about her qualifications and concern about the lack of a paper trail outlining her views.

Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have said they might call Dobson to testify at Miers' upcoming confirmation hearings because of his statements implying he has confidential information about the nominee.

Last week, Dobson told listeners to his Christian-oriented radio program: "When you know some of the things I know - that I probably shouldn't know - that take me in this direction, you'll know why I've said with fear and trepidation (that) I believe Harriet Miers will be a good justice."

Dobson said he spoke to President Bush's lead political adviser, Karl Rove, before the Miers nomination, although he has not said what they discussed.

That has raised concern among some U.S. senators, including Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., who say the White House should tell lawmakers whatever Dobson was told.

Focus on the Family spokesman Paul Hetrick said Monday that Dobson plans to address the Miers nomination again in a two-part broadcast scheduled to air Wednesday and Thursday.

"What he knows about her so far he likes, and enough to endorse her," Hetrick said. "Like all of us, he'd like to know more."

He said Dobson is looking forward to hearing Miers testify at the upcoming hearings, but that the committee has not asked him to appear.

On Sunday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said on the ABC network's This Week broadcast that if there are "backroom assurances" or "backroom deals" about how a nominee is going to vote, "I think that's a matter that ought to be known by the Judiciary Committee and the American people."

Questions over what Dobson knows prompted the committee's ranking Democrat, Sen. Pat Leahy, D-Vt., to ask Miers last week whether she had told anyone how she would vote on any specific cases. She reportedly told Leahy: "I will be my own person. I will be independent. Nobody has the authority or right or ability to tell how I'm going to vote."

Dobson is a longtime opponent of abortion and has said he hopes the Supreme Court soon will reverse its landmark 1973 decision that cemented abortion rights. He said he believes Miers is against abortion, but in last week's broadcast added that "if I have made a mistake here, I will never forget it. The blood of those babies who will die will be on my hands to a degree."

Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family is one of the most prominent Christian media empires in the world, with Dobson's regular radio commentaries aired on 3,500 outlets in the United States.

Hetrick said Dobson has received more than 100 media interview requests since he offered a tentative endorsement of Miers while other conservatives expressed skepticism.

"He feels that enough time has passed and enough has been said in the media that he feels he can make some additional comments to any who are interested, especially to our constituents," Hetrick said.

"Our constituents, just as everyone else in the country, are consumers of news. He would want them to have perhaps a more complete understanding of what they may be reading in the news."

Hear it live

• Focus on the Family broadcast information can be found at www.family.org/fmedia/radiolog/index.cfm
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Oct, 2005 08:04 pm
Libby Didn't Disclose Earlier Talk With Reporter, Magazine Says
Oct. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Lewis Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, didn't disclose to a grand jury a key conversation he had with New York Times reporter Judith Miller in June 2003, the National Journal reported, citing unidentified people with firsthand knowledge of his testimony.

Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald may have learned about the June 23 conversation for the first time days ago, after attorneys for Miller and the Times told prosecutors that Miller discovered notes on the conversation, the magazine said.

Libby is one of the Bush administration officials who have been questioned in the investigation into who leaked Central Intelligence Agency operative Valerie Plame's identity to reporters in 2003. Her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, publicly accused President George W. Bush's aides of twisting intelligence reports to justify the war in Iraq.

During two interviews with FBI agents and in two subsequent grand jury appearances, Libby discussed a July 8, 2003, conversation about Plame that he and Miller had at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington, as well a July 12 telephone conversation on the same subject, the National Journal reported. He never disclosed the June 23 conversation with Miller, the magazine said.

Libby's lawyer Joseph Tate and representatives of Cheney's office didn't respond to a request for comment.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=ackdHMmSVSHI&refer=us
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Oct, 2005 05:04 am
According to Huffington...

Quote:
The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg are working on stories that point to Vice President Dick Cheney as the target of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation into the leaking of CIA operative Valerie Plame's name.


Might explain why we haven't seen much of Cheney lately.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Oct, 2005 10:32 am
An outcome better than Rove behind bars?

Quote:

Today's Wall Street Journal contains a vital story by John McKinnon, Joe Hagan, and Anne Marie Squeo. They report that the NYT's Judith Miller, the Mata Hari of modern journalism, testified at Fitzgerald's panel yesterday and will return again today--and that Karl Rove may take this stand as early as today too.

But the aspect of the story that's got people buzzing seems to confirm the point I was speculating about yesterday concerning the White House Iraq Group--namely, that Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation is headed straight at them. The WSJ reporters write:

There are signs that prosecutors now are looking into contacts between administration officials and journalists that took place much earlier than previously thought. Earlier conversations are potentially significant, because that suggests the special prosecutor leading the investigation is exploring whether there was an effort within the administration at an early stage to develop and disseminate confidential information to the press that could undercut former Ambassador Joseph Wilson and his wife, Central Intelligence Agency official Valerie Plame....

Lawyers familiar with the investigation believe that at least part of the outcome likely hangs on the inner workings of what has been dubbed the White House Iraq Group. Formed in August 2002, the group, which included Messrs. Rove and Libby, worked on setting strategy for selling the war in Iraq to the public in the months leading up to the March 2003 invasion. The group likely would have played a significant role in responding to Mr. Wilson's claims...

In a memo to staffers yesterday, New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller confirmed that [Judith] Miller would return to the grand jury "to supplement her earlier testimony," and noted that this means Ms. Miller is "not yet clear of legal jeopardy." [emphasis added]
http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2005/10/roveplame_judy_2.asp

White House Iraq Group history and personnel
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 11:35 am
Washington Insider: Rove Threatens Indictment Judge With 'Consequences'


Wayne Madsen | 14 Oct 2005

To all those who have been kind with their support for this site, thanks again so much! Now, let me report to you what I've discovered prowling Washington tonight on the CIA Leakgate story, the "October Surprise" scandal that threatens the survival of the G.W. Bush/Cheney administration.

Political insiders tracking this scandal are reporting that the GOP and neo-con political machines, which have also targeted Travis County, Texas District Attorney Ronnie Earle in retaliation for his indictments of Tom DeLay and other Texas GOP operatives, are also setting their sights on CIA Leakgate special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

The word inside the Beltway is that if Fitzgerald delivers indictments against senior White House officials he will face unspecified "consequences."

"It's a sign of desperation on the part of the White House and Karl Rove's machine," said one individual familiar with the case. Another informed observer pointed out that Fitzgerald "is the last guy the White House would want to threaten with retaliation."

Tomorrow, Rove is scheduled to testify for the fourth time before the grand jury investigating the CIA leak and the associated conspiracy to obstruct justice by the White House Iraq Group (WHIG).
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 05:46 pm
"Consequences", huh?

This just keeps getting better and better, doesn't it? Twisted Evil Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 08:52 pm
That's a rumor I don't credit. The White House, actually the entire conservative camp, has to this point steered well away from even suggesting negatives when referring to Fitzgerald and his grand jury investigation. Pissing Fitzgerald off was clearly perceived as a foolish option.

The direction the attacks will take (if indictments come down) will be to criticize the process or the 'reach' of Fitzgerald's investigation. Both Toensing and Frum have already begun to play it that way.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 09:55 pm
Wasn't Fitzgerald the prosecutor in a terrorist trial?

That would make it hard for the WH to demonize him without breaking into that "with us or against us" argument.

Yep.. found this.....
Quote:
As a glutton for work, Fitzgerald got in on some high-profile cases and eventually headed White's anti-terrorist unit.

In 1993, he helped jail a Gambino crime family capo and three other mobsters for murder, racketeering, narcotics trafficking and other crimes.

He helped send terrorist leader Omar Abdel Rahman, known as "the blind sheik," to federal prison for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and conspiring to blow up bridges and buildings.

And he supervised the 1996 trial of three men who plotted to blow up 12 airliners.

Charges against bin Laden
Fitzgerald also brought charges that Osama bin Laden and 22 of his followers conspired to murder Americans and were responsible for the August 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa. Four defendants went to trial and are serving life.



Yeah.. "Fitzgerald is incompetent" would work well as an argument from the WH..
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Oct, 2005 05:10 pm
Miller's Inaccurate Info From Libby May Help CIA Leak Probe
Miller's Inaccurate Info From Libby May Help CIA Leak Probe
By JOHN SOLOMON and PETE YOST, Associated Press Writers
Published: October 18, 2005 12:11 AM ET
WASHINGTON (AP)

In Sunday's paper, Judith Miller wrote, "the Pentagon had given me clearance to see secret information as part of my assignment 'embedded' with a special military unit hunting for unconventional weapons." On Monday, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said he was unaware of Miller having any such security clearance.

Information attributed to Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff in New York Times reporter Judith Miller's interview notes is incorrect, offering prosecutors a potential lead to tracking the bad information to its original source.

Miller disclosed this weekend that her notes of a conversation she had with I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby on July 8, 2003 stated Cheney's top aide told her that the wife of Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson worked for the CIA's Weapons Intelligence, Non-Proliferation, and Arms Control (WINPAC) unit.

Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, never worked for WINPAC, an analysis unit in the overt side of the CIA, and instead worked in a position in the CIA's secret side, known as the directorate of operations, according to three people familiar with her work for the spy agency.

The three all spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the current secrecy requirements of Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's grand jury investigation into the leak of Plame's identity in 2003 to the media.

The revelation came as President Bush weighed in Monday by declining to say what he would do if one of his aides were indicted in the investigation, and the Pentagon looked into Miller's claim that she was granted a security clearance in 2003 while reporting with a military unit during the Iraq war.

Libby previously testified to the grand jury and it is not known whether he provided the information about WINPAC during his testimony.

Whether it came from Libby or Miller's notes, former federal prosecutors and investigators said the incorrect information provides a significant lead for Fitzgerald and FBI agents to follow. It could suggest Libby thought Plame was not an undercover spy, and therefore couldn't have knowingly revealed her occupation, or that he got his information from uninformed sources, they said.

"The fact that the information is inaccurate may make it of even greater interest to the grand jury than accurate information," said Lance Cole, former Democratic counsel to the Senate Whitewater Committee and now a law professor at Penn State Dickinson School of law.

"Accurate information presumably can come from any number of sources. If he got it from a particular document or in a meeting and that document or notes of that meeting are the only place that the inaccuracy is present, then that establishes the source," Cole said.

Danny Coulson, a former top FBI official who conducted several investigations of leaks, said the possibility that Libby passed on wrong information to a reporter may indicate he didn't get his information from a credible, official source.

"What it tells me is he probably got his information from dinner talk," Coulson said. Presidential aides "had access to the official information and if they had used that, you would think they would have had the right stuff."

Even if Libby or other White House aides did not knowingly reveal Plame's covert identity, the prosecutor could consider other charges such as the mishandling of classified information, false statements and obstruction of justice, lawyers have said.

In her story published Sunday recounting her legal battle and imprisonment for refusing to testify earlier, Miller described her breakfast meeting conversation on July 8, 2003 with Libby and the point at which it turned to Plame.

"My notes contain a phrase inside parentheses: 'Wife works at Winpac.' Mr. Fitzgerald asked what that meant," Miller wrote.

"I told the grand jury that I believed that this was the first time I had heard that Mr. Wilson's wife worked for Winpac," she wrote. "In fact, I told the grand jury that when Mr. Libby indicated that Ms. Plame worked for Winpac, I assumed that she worked as an analyst, not as an undercover operative."

With the investigation nearing an end, Bush on Monday declined to say whether he would remove an aide under indictment.

"There's a serious investigation," the president said. "I'm not going to prejudge the outcome of the investigation." He commented in response to reporters' questions during a meeting with Bulgaria's president, Georgi Parvanov.

Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, as well as Libby have been questioned by the grand jury. Rove last week made his fourth and final appearance, where he was pressed on conflicts between his account and those of other witnesses.

At the Pentagon, officials also looked into Miller's claim that she had a security clearance while working as an embedded reporter during the Iraq war, shortly before her conversations with Libby.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said he was unaware of Miller having a security clearance. He said security clearances are covered by privacy laws, so he couldn't talk about it.

But Whitman said reporters who were embedded with military units during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars signed ground rules in which they agreed not to make public sensitive or secret information that they learned while with the unit.

"For a security clearance you have to go through any number of specific background investigative checks, and there are different agencies that do those. And depending on the level of clearance that's required, there's certain paperwork that has to be filled out and it has to be adjudicated," said Whitman.

He said commanders can't simply give a reporter a security clearance while in the field with the unit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOHN SOLOMON and PETE YOST, Associated Press Writers ([email protected]) Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Oct, 2005 05:27 pm
White House Watch: Cheney resignation rumors fly

Charlie Archambault for USN&WR

Posted 10/18/05
By Paul Bedard

Sparked by today's Washington Post story that suggests Vice President Cheney's office is involved in the Plame-CIA spy link investigation, government officials and advisers passed around rumors that the vice president might step aside and that President Bush would elevate Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

"It's certainly an interesting but I still think highly doubtful scenario," said a Bush insider. "And if that should happen," added the official, "there will undoubtedly be those who believe the whole thing was orchestrated - another brilliant Machiavellian move by the VP."

Said another Bush associate of the rumor, "Yes. This is not good." The rumor spread so fast that some Republicans by late morning were already drawing up reasons why Rice couldn't get the job or run for president in 2008.

"Isn't she pro-choice?" asked a key Senate Republican aide. Many White House insiders, however, said the Post story and reports that the investigation was coming to a close had officials instead more focused on who would be dragged into the affair and if top aides would be indicted and forced to resign.

"Folks on the inside and near inside are holding their breath and wondering what's next," said a Bush adviser. But, he added, they aren't focused on the future of the vice president. "Not that, at least not seriously," he said.
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/051018/18whwatch.htm?track=rss
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Oct, 2005 07:13 pm
this sure didn't disappear into a long weekend fog, as was once opined
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Oct, 2005 06:40 am
No, beth, it surely hasn't.
Quote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3449870/
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Oct, 2005 08:27 am
Bush hit the trifecta once again
George Bush wins once again even as he loses. He got us into a war with Judy Miller's help. With Miller's help, he has permanently damaged the New York Times, the Paper of Record.

Even after Bush and his corrupt cronies are out of office, the Times will still be struggling to restore its reputation. Bush's legacy will be up for discussion forever.

BBB
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Oct, 2005 06:41 pm
List of witnesses
National Journal Hotline
10/19/05

Here's a list of folks who have either testified or have been interviewed by Patrick Fitzgerald (or by FBI agents) in connection with the Plame probe. The list below is of those who have been interviewed by officials in connection with the case. Inclusion does not necessarily indicate that the listed person has testified under oath.

Bush: Early Summer, 2004 (did not testify under oath)
Cheney: Early summer, 2004 (did not testify under oath)
Ex-Dep. Sec/State Richard Armitage
WH Assist. To. Pres. Dan Bartlett
Ex-WH press aide Claire Buchan: Feb. 6, 2004
WH COS Andy Card
Time's Matt Cooper: July 13, 2005
Ex-WH press. sec. Ari Fleischer (at least twice)
A.G. Alberto Gonzales: June 18, 2004
Ex-DOS BIR dir. Carl Ford
NSA Stephen Hadley
Ex-CIA comm. dir. Bill Harlow
Assis. Sec. of Commerce/Ex-Rove assist. Izzy Hernandez
Assist. Sec. of State Karen Hughes
Ex-Sec/State counterproliferation offic. Bob Joseph
Washington Post's Glenn Kessler
Ex junior WH press aide Adam Levine: Feb. 6, 2004
Cheney CoS Irving L. "Scooter" Libby (twice)
Ex-Cheney adviser Mary Matalin: Late January, 2004
Current WH Press Sec. Scott McClellan: Feb, 6, 2004
Ex-CIA dep. dir. John McLaughlin
Cheney aide Cathie Martin
New York Times ' Judy Miller (twice)
CIA comm. dir. Jennifer Millerwise (did not go before grand jury)
Columnist Bob Novak
Ex-Sec/State Colin Powell: July 16, 2004
Ex-Abramoff assist./Rove assist. Susan Ralston
WH DCoS Karl Rove (4 times)
NBC News' Tim Russert
Stranger who stopped Novak in the street
Ex-CIA dir. George Tenet
Sen. Adviser to Sec/State Jim Wilkinson (has said he did not testify)
Ex-Amb. Joseph Wilson

On the witness list at one point but never called to tesify:

New York Times' Nick Kristoff

"Cooperated" with Fitzgerald:

Sec/State Condoleezza Rice

Others believed to have testified:

John Hannah, David Wurmser (senior members of Cheney's staff) (Hotline sources)

Other journalists mentioned in press acounts as having initially sparked Fitzgerald's interest:

Time's Massimo Calabresi
Time's Mike Duffy
Time's James Carney
NBC's Andrea Mitchell
NYTer David Sanger
Newsday's Timothy M. Phelps
Newsday's Knut Royce
Newsweek's Evan Thomas
Ex-Postie Mike Allen
NBC's Campbell Brown
WSJ ed. page. editor Paul Gigot / reporter Greg Hitt
Ex-celeb. James Guckert/Jeff Gannon
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Oct, 2005 11:20 pm
Who Planted One in Scooter's Back?
Who Planted One in Scooter's Back?
Jane Hamsher
10.19.2005

There has still been no explaination as to how the incriminating letters that now seem to be forming much of the Special Counsel's case against Scooter Libby (including his torrid Aspen Trees missive) got into the hands of the New York Times, and possibly made their way to Patrick Fitzgerald. A source within the Times is now shedding some light on the matter.

Those who have been folliowing the story will recall that on October 1, following Judith Miller's release from jail on September 29 and her testimony before the grand jury on September 30, the New York Times ran an article that was accompanied by a PDF of three letters:

1. One from Scooter Libby to Judith Miller (the famous "aspens are turning" letter)

2. One from Scooter's attorney, Joseph Tate, to Judith Miler's criminal attorney, Bob Bennett

3. One from Judith Miller's First Amendment attorney, Floyd Abrams, to Joseph Tate.

The letters were so damning to Libby that I had to wonder where they came from, and what the motives were of the people who decided to leak them. And I speculated at the time that Patrick Fitzgerald may not have had those documents prior to that leak, and about how the complexion of the case might change as a result.

I have been really surprised that this question hasn't piqued the curiosity of more people, especially when Fitzgerald's September 12 letter (PDF) was leaked the next day to the New York Sun, and it became clear that he had in fact asked not to see any letter that Libby wrote to Miller, promising not to hit them with an obsturction charge so long as Scooter did not coach Judy's testimony. It is therefore probable that Scooter wrote his saccharine prose thinking that Fitzgerald would never lay eyes on it.

Since that time, I find that most of the people I talk to accept the conventional wisdom that the documents were leaked by the Times who thought it was in Judy Miller's interest to do so, since the letters demonstrate that she did, in fact, seek a waiver from Libby, contrary to what his attorney Joseph Tate was saying. But the notion that the corporate end of the paper (Sulzberger, etc.) whose primary directive seems to be watch your ass, boy would go out on that kind of legal and ethical limb never made any sense to me.

Now a source at the New York Times is confirming that the documents did in fact come to them via an outside leak. According to the person who wishes to remain anonymous, the documents were in circulation and available to "journalists working on the story" as early as September 29, the day of Judy's release from jail. By the time they were published by the Times on October 1, the content of the Fitzgerald letter was also known to people at the Times, although they had not seen it.

Who leaked the letters? Nobody who knows is telling. But in light of Bob Bennett's appearance on This Week on Sunday, Swopa's theory is making a whole lot of sense, namely that when Bennett received Libby's letter he realized he had a hot potato in his lap. If he didn't turn it over to Fitzgerald, his client might be looking at serious obstruction charges if it was ever discovered.

On the other hand, the response that makes the most sense in that situation is to hand it over to the Special Counsel rather than leak to the media. Did whoever leaked those letters to the Times and others have an agenda to publicly bury Libby? Fitzgerald may or may not have had them prior to their publication, but the release to the media of those letters guaranteed that the public knew Scooter was going to walk the plank.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2005 07:49 am
Yea, it does look like libby is going to one to be sacrficed in this saga by the WH.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/19/AR2005101902431.html

Rove Told Jury Libby May Have Been His Source In Leak Case
Top Aides Talked Before Plame's Name Was Public

By Jim VandeHei and Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, October 20, 2005; A01


Quote:

White House adviser Karl Rove told the grand jury in the CIA leak case that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, may have told him that CIA operative Valerie Plame worked for the intelligence agency before her identity was revealed, a source familiar with Rove's account said yesterday.

In a talk that took place in the days before Plame's CIA employment was revealed in 2003, Rove and Libby discussed conversations they had had with reporters in which Plame and her marriage to Iraq war critic Joseph C. Wilson IV were raised, the source said. Rove told the grand jury the talk was confined to information the two men heard from reporters, the source said.

Rove has also testified that he also heard about Plame from someone else outside the White House, but could not recall who.

The account is the first time a person familiar with Rove's testimony has provided clues about where the deputy chief of staff learned about Plame, and confirmed that Rove and Libby were involved in a conversation about her before her identity became public. The disclosure seemed to further undermine the White House's contention early in the case that neither man was in any way involved in unmasking Plame.

But it leaves unanswered the central question of the more than two-year-old case: Did anyone commit a crime in leaking information about Plame to the media?



(quick comment: Why would they be investigating this so heavily for two years if no crime was committed? What would be the point?)

Quote:
Libby's lawyer, Joseph Tate, did not return calls for comment last night. Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, declined to comment. The development was first reported last night by the Associated Press.

Lawyers in the case have said Rove and Libby are the central focus of Special Prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald's 22-month investigation, which is scheduled to end by the time the grand jury expires Oct. 28. But they are not the only officials worried about the uncertain conclusion to the case.

John Hannah, an aide to Cheney and one of two dozen people questioned in the CIA leak case, has told friends in recent months he is worried he may be implicated by the investigation, according to two U.S. officials.

It is not clear whether Hannah had any role in unmasking Plame, or why he should fear Fitzgerald's probe. But the eleventh-hour emergence of another possible target shows how Fitzgerald has cast his net so widely over the past two years that it is impossible to know who, if anyone, it might ensnare.

Fitzgerald and his team have interviewed or taken before the grand jury at least two dozen officials or staffers from the White House, the vice president's office, the State Department and the CIA, according to people involved in the case.

Fitzgerald has dug into the deepest corners of the administration, pressing for information about everything from the mechanics of a secretive group of officials tasked with selling the Iraq war, to the State Department officials who assembled information on Wilson, the diplomat-turned-Iraq war critic, according to people familiar with the case. The focus has been on who leaked Plame's name, and who else knew about it.

But many unknowns remain. What role did Hannah play? What, if any, role was played by former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer? Who was the second source for Robert D. Novak, the columnist who first disclosed Plame's name and role in July 2003? Who was the White House official who leaked word about Wilson's wife to The Washington Post's Walter Pincus, who has never publicly revealed his source?

It is possible the public will never learn the answers to these and other questions because Fitzgerald is not required to produce a report and could complete the investigation without charging anyone with a crime.

But White House officials and lawyers are prepared for Fitzgerald to charge at least one official, and maybe more.

Fitzgerald began the probe seeking to determine whether any government official illegally leaked Plame's identity to the media in retaliation for Wilson's criticism that the administration had twisted intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq. Wilson, who had traveled on a CIA-sponsored mission to Niger, had questioned President Bush's assertion that Baghdad had tried to obtain uranium in Africa for a nuclear weapons program.

The new information about Hannah signals how broadly the prosecutor has probed for answers. As Cheney's deputy national security adviser, he was intimately involved in Iraq policy.

Hannah is one of at least five people in the Cheney operation who have been interviewed by federal investigators.

Fitzgerald's interest in the vice president's office became clearer as the case continued: Cheney was central to building the case that then-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein sought nuclear weapons-grade material in Niger and Libby helped discredit Wilson in part by talking about his wife, according to lawyers in the case.

Fitzgerald talked to Cheney personally near the beginning of the investigation, though according to a person familiar with the case, he has not questioned him since. Fitzgerald and his investigative team interviewed Mary Matalin, a former top Cheney adviser; Catherine Martin, his former communications adviser; and Jennifer Millerwise, his former spokeswoman.

Among the media, most of the focus has been on New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who spent 85 days in jail before agreeing to testify about her conversations with Libby, and Time magazine's Matt Cooper, the other reporter whom Fitzgerald threatened to jail if he did not reveal his sources.

Cooper, after receiving permission from sources, testified before the grand jury and later said publicly that Rove and Libby had talked to him about Plame. But other reporters were contacted by other White House officials about Plame during the crucial week in July 2003 after Wilson's views became public, according to government officials and people involved in the case.

This leaves open the possibility of a broader leak campaign. In September of 2003, a senior administration official told The Post that at least six journalists were contacted about Plame by two top White House officials.

One of the longest-running mysteries of the case is the identity of Novak's second source. Rove has testified that he discussed Plame in passing with Novak, but it is not clear who else did. Novak has provided scant information about the person's identity. It is unknown whether Novak has cooperated with Fitzgerald, but many familiar with the case believe he has because he did not face the same contempt of court charges levied against Miller and Cooper.

A member of the staff of James Hamilton, Novak's lawyer, said he had no comment.

Pincus, who spoke with Fitzgerald early in the case after his source said he could, has never revealed who told him that Wilson's wife helped arrange the trip to Niger. Pincus has said the source was not Libby, and has described the person as a "White House official" who called him. The source came forward to the prosecutor and released Pincus to discuss their conversation with Fitzgerald but not with the public.

Many White House officials have been called before the grand jury, including spokesman Scott McClellan, senior adviser Dan Bartlett, former communications aide Adam Levine and Fleischer, among others. Bush spoke personally with Fitzgerald early in the probe.

One reason Fitzgerald expressed interest in Fleischer, administration officials said, is his presence on a July 2003 presidential trip to Africa. On that flight aboard Air Force One, then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell had a memo that mentioned Wilson's wife, in a section marked "S" for secret, according to some administration officials. But Powell said on CNN this week the memo he saw did not mention Plame.

According to people involved in the case, prosecutors believe a printout of that memo was in the front of Air Force One during the July 7-12 trip Bush took to Africa, but investigators are unsure who saw it. The prosecutor has also examined the role of Stephen J. Hadley, Bush's national security adviser. In an e-mail that surfaced earlier this year, Rove told Hadley, then deputy national security adviser, about his conversation with Cooper, saying he waved the reporter off Wilson's allegations. The e-mail was not turned over until long after the probe began.

One person in the probe said Fitzgerald showed considerable early interest in the White House Iraq Group, a task force created by Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. in August 2002 and charged with "marketing" the war in Iraq to the public.

The group met weekly in the Situation Room. Its regular participants were Rove, Libby, Hadley, then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, adviser Karen Hughes, Matalin, and White House director of legislative affairs Nicholas Calio.

The special prosecutor has talked to a number of Foggy Bottom officials about the State Department memo, drafted about a month before Plame's identity was disclosed. Fitzgerald has questioned Powell about his knowledge of the document, according to people familiar with the case.

Former CIA director George J. Tenet and ex-deputy director John E. McLaughlin, were both interviewed by prosecutors. Bill Harlow, CIA public affairs director, went before the grand jury and was questioned about a conversation he had with Novak before Novak's column appeared. Sources said he was contacted by Novak about the Plame information and told him not to publish her name or information about her.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2005 03:35 pm
The Fitzgerald Website!
When I read ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson's account of his luncheon with someone connected to the case, I thought it might not be substantive enough to pass along, but subsequent events have changed my mind, so here goes:

"Had lunch today with a person who has a direct tie to one of the folks facing indictment in the Plame affair. There are 22 files that Fitzgerald is looking at for potential indictment . These include Stephen Hadley, Karl Rove, Lewis Libby, Dick Cheney, and Mary Matalin (there are others of course). Hadley has told friends he expects to be indicted. No wonder folks are nervous at the White House."

The subsequent event that changed my mind? Prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald has unveiled ... his new website! Hardly the act of someone about to fold up his tent and steal away into the night .....

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/comments.php?id=2448_0_1_0_C
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/06/2025 at 05:06:41