8
   

Fitzgerald Investigation of Leak of Identity of CIA Agent

 
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Apr, 2006 06:58 pm
squinney wrote:
Gee, don't ya think maybe if she wasn't covert the administration would have said so a looooong time ago?

Why let it get to this point instead of just nippin it in the bud so they could be done with it and have the electorate forget about it in plenty of time for the election?

Wilson: "Hey, you outed my wife in an attempt to make me out to be a low life!!! How dare you out my covert wife!!!"

Cheney: "What's this looney talking about? His wife isn't covert. She's been workin over at headquarters for the last ten years as a paperclip straightner. See, ya can't believe anything this guy says about yellow cake."


Uh, Duh, Whadyasay ???

Tico would rather play lawyer and bend the lies into what he wants us to believe is the truth, no matter how ridiculous or inane it is. It's hard bending ****, it keeps mushing around. Well, ya can't quit apologizing for the Prez. ya know ... he be da man!! He be da heros hero!! We ALL know what a hero Tico is!! He's up there on the front lines protecting us from Osama and the terrorists ... with his mouth Smile

Anon
0 Replies
 
RichNDanaPoint
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Apr, 2006 08:03 pm
kickycan wrote:
Let's see if we can guess what the Bush/Cheney bootlickers response will be.

I'm going with, "Libby is a disgruntled former staffer and obviously can't be trusted."

Any other guesses?


Oh the famous, but Clinton got a blow job from an intern Laughing
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Apr, 2006 08:14 pm
Quote:
Bush at Center of Intelligence Leak

By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Thursday 06 April 2006

Attorneys and current and former White House officials close to the investigation into the leak of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson said Thursday that President Bush gave Vice President Dick Cheney the authorization in mid-June 2003 to disclose a portion of the highly sensitive National Intelligence Estimate to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward and former New York Times reporter Judith Miller.

These current and former White House officials are among the 36 witnesses who have testified before a grand jury and have been cooperating with the special counsel's probe since its inception.

The officials, some of whom are attorneys close to the case, added that more than two dozen emails that the vice president's office said it recently discovered and handed over to leak investigators in February show that President Bush was kept up to date about the circumstances surrounding the effort to discredit former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

The sources indicated that the leak probe is now winding down, and that soon, new information will emerge from the special counsel's office that will prove President Bush had prior knowledge of the White House campaign to discredit Plame Wilson's husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who accused the administration of "twisting" intelligence on the Iraqi threat in order to win public support for the war.

The new information that surfaced late Wednesday places President Bush at the center of the probe for the first time since the investigation into the leak began more than two years ago and raises new questions as to whether Bush knew in advance the lengths to which senior White House officials went to discredit Wilson.

In the court filing, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald wrote that Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, "testified that he was specifically authorized in advance of the meeting to disclose the key judgments of the classified NIE to [former New York Times reporter Judith] Miller on that occasion because it was thought that the NIE was 'pretty definitive' against what Ambassador Wilson had said and that the Vice President thought that it was 'very important' for the key judgments of the NIE to come out."

"Defendant further testified that he at first advised the Vice President that he could not have this conversation with reporter Miller because of the classified nature of the NIE. Defendant testified that the Vice President later advised him that the President had authorized defendant to disclose the relevant portions of the NIE," the filing further states. "Defendant testified that he also spoke to David Addington, then Counsel to the Vice President, whom defendant considered to be an expert in national security law, and Mr. Addington opined that Presidential authorization to publicly disclose a document amounted to a declassification of the document. Defendant testified that he thought he brought a brief abstract of the NIE's key judgments to the meeting with Miller on July 8. Defendant understood that he was to tell Miller, among other things, that a key judgment of the NIE held that Iraq was 'vigorously trying to procure' uranium. Defendant testified that this July 8th meeting was the only time he recalled in his government experience when he disclosed a document to a reporter that was effectively declassified by virtue of the President's authorization that it be disclosed. Defendant testified that one of the reasons why he met with Miller at a hotel was the fact that he was sharing this information with Miller exclusively."

In October 2003, three months after Plame Wilson's CIA status and identity were unmasked in print by columnist Robert Novak, President Bush said publicly that it was unlikely that the individual who leaked her name would ever be found.

"I mean this is a town full of people who like to leak information," Bush said during a press conference on Oct. 7, 2003. "And I don't know if we're going to find out the senior administration official. Now, this is a large administration, and there's lots of senior officials. I don't have any idea."

Details of President Bush's involvement in the effort to counter the former ambassador's claims came in a court document filed late Wednesday evening in US District Court in Washington by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, which was first reported by the New York Sun newspaper.

President Bush retained a private attorney when he was interviewed in the leak probe two years ago, specifically about whether he knew about it or had authorized it.

According to four attorneys who over the past two days have read a transcript of the President Bush's interview with investigators, Bush did not disclose to either investigators or the special counsel that he had authorized Cheney or any other administration official to leak portions of the NIE to Woodward and Miller or any other reporter. Rather, these people said the president said he frowned upon "selective leaks."

Bush also said during the interview two years ago that he had no prior knowledge that anyone on his staff had been involved in a campaign to discredit Wilson or that individuals retaliated against the former ambassador by leaking his wife's undercover identity to reporters.


The 39-page court document Fitzgerald filed late Wednesday included previously unreported testimony given to a grand jury by Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Libby was indicted in October on five-counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and lying to investigators about how he discovered Plame Wilson's identity.

Libby testified that Cheney had received explicit instruction from President Bush to declassify a portion of the October 2002 NIE that said Iraq tried to purchase 500 tons of yellowcake uranium ore from Niger and share that information with reporters like Miller and Woodward, whose previous work proved to be sympathetic to the administration and would help to discredit Wilson, according to the court document and attorneys and current and former administration officials close to the investigation.

Libby's "participation in a critical conversation with Judith Miller on July 8 (discussed further below) occurred only after the Vice President advised defendant that the President specifically had authorized defendant to disclose certain information in the NIE," the Fitzgerald's filing states. "Defendant testified that the circumstances of his conversation with reporter Miller - getting approval from the President through the Vice President to discuss material that would be classified but for that approval - were unique in his recollection."

"Defendant further testified that on July 12, 2003, he was specifically directed by the Vice President to speak to the press in place of Cathie Martin (then the communications person for the Vice President) regarding the NIE and Wilson," the court filing states. "Defendant was instructed to provide what was for him an extremely rare "on the record" statement, and to provide "background" and "deep background" statements, and to provide information contained in a document defendant understood to be the cable authored by Mr. Wilson."

On June 27, 2003, two weeks before Libby's meeting with Miller and disclosing to her portions of the NIE, Libby met with Woodward, the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, and leaked the portion of the NIE that dealt with Iraq's attempt to acquire uranium from Niger, which was first reported by this reporter in March.

A week or so earlier, Woodward met with two other government officials, one of whom told him in a "casual" and off-handed manner that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.

Woodward said the meeting with Libby and the other government officials had been set up simply as "confidential background interviews for my 2004 book 'Plan of Attack' about the lead-up to the Iraq war, ongoing reporting for the Washington Post and research for a book on Bush's second term to be published in 2006."

Woodward wrote a first-person account for the Washington Post after he gave a sworn deposition to Fitzgerald about information he had learned about Valerie Plame Wilson. It was a shocking revelation at the time. Woodward had publicly discounted the importance of the Plame Wilson leak and had referred to Fitzgerald as a "junkyard dog" prosecutor. He then revealed in November that he had been told about Plame Wilson's CIA employment in June 2003 - before any other journalist.

The Watergate-era journalist wrote that when he met with Libby on June 27, 2003, "Libby discussed the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, mentioned "yellowcake" and said there was an effort by the Iraqis to get it from Africa. It goes back to February '02. This was the time of Wilson's trip to Niger."

The information in the NIE about Niger was still considered highly classified and extremely sensitive, and although Woodward had been the recipient of classified information on other occasions during the course of gathering material for his books, the data he was provided with concerning the NIE had been authorized by Cheney in order to rebut Wilson. Woodward never wrote a story for the Post about the intelligence information he was given.

President Bush signed an executive order in March 2003 authorizing Cheney to declassify certain intelligence documents. The executive order was signed on March 23, 2003, four days after the start of the Iraq war, and two weeks after Wilson first appeared on the administration's radar.


http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/printer_040606Y.shtml

Bush and Cheney said to Fitzgerald that they didn't know of any attempt to discredit Joe Wilson inside the WH; but they, according to emails, were kept up with the status of said attempt.

I'd better not jump to any conclusions, and just wait and see how this turns out.

Cycloptichorn

<toe tapping>
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 6 Apr, 2006 08:31 pm
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/000310.php

Quote:
Bush's Secret Declassification
By Paul Kiel - April 6, 2006, 3:28 PM

Over at TPM, Josh asks whether President Bush's declassification of the Iraq National Intelligence Estimate was a one-off, a whim, rather than an official declassification.

Patrick Fitzgerald's characterization of Scooter Libby's testimony makes clear that this declassification was an inside deal that only Bush, V.P. Cheney, and Libby knew about:

Quote:
According to defendant [Libby], at the time of his conversations with [Judith] Miller and [Matthew] Cooper, he understood that only three people - the President, the Vice President and defendant - knew that the key judgments of the [National Intelligence Estimate] had been declassified. Defendant testified in the grand jury that he understood that even in the days following his conversation with Ms. Miller, other key officials - including Cabinet level officials - were not made aware of the earlier declassification even as those officials were pressed to carry out a declassification of the NIE, the report about Wilson's trip and another classified document dated January 24, 2003.


Why would the administration be pressing their subordinates to declassify an NIE that they were already telling people about?

Even though the president has the power fo declassify documents, does he just wave his hand, or is there a process that he must follow?

If there is a process, and Bush (through his subordinates) was telling reporters about the info before the process was completed, did Bush violate the terms of that process?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 04:53 am
The way this is playing out in the so called liberal media.

Quote:


http://www.thinkprogress.org/

The way I see the whole thing is that someone wanted Libby to blab to reporters about classified information of the Iraq war because of the flack of the Wilson article. Libby said he couldn't because it was classified. Bush unclassified it by authorizing Libby to blab to reporters in order to discredit Wilson. This action eventually led to Libby talking to reporters about Valerie Plame according to Libby's testimony.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 08:19 am
BBB
Once again, I'm disappointed with the press. Not one journalist stated the obvious following the release of Libby's claim. The president and vice president can declassify anything they want. But it does not change the fact that there is a Congressional Law making it a felony to identify a CIA covert agent. Neither Bush nor Cheney can override a Congressional Law. Bush, Cheney and Libby violated the law---classified or declassified.

BBB
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 08:22 am
Re: BBB
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Once again, I'm disappointed with the press. Not one journalist stated the obvious following the release of Libby's claim. The president and vice president can declassify anything they want. But it does not change the fact that there is a Congressional Law making it a felony to identify a CIA covert agent. Neither Bush nor Cheney can override a Congressional Law. Bush, Cheney and Libby violated the law---classified or declassified.

BBB


That damned liberal press you know!!

Anon
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 08:39 am
Re: BBB
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Once again, I'm disappointed with the press. Not one journalist stated the obvious following the release of Libby's claim. The president and vice president can declassify anything they want.

BBB


No they can't. Under the right circumstances they can but certainly not for political purposes.

This was discussed by John Dean on Olbermann last night. The NYT had a fairly good account of this story as well....and a reporter shouted a question at Bush yesterday which he avoided.

What people fail to realize is that this particular event (the court filing) has nothing to do with possible illegal activity on the part of the President and Vice-President. It only adresses the Libby matter.

Of course, the press and the people only needs to connect the dots.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 09:02 am
revel wrote:
The way I see the whole thing is that someone wanted Libby to blab to reporters about classified information of the Iraq war because of the flack of the Wilson article. Libby said he couldn't because it was classified. Bush unclassified it by authorizing Libby to blab to reporters in order to discredit Wilson. This action eventually led to Libby talking to reporters about Valerie Plame according to Libby's testimony.


Really good summary. That's how I see it at this point too, I think.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 09:05 am
revel puts it in simple language that everyone can understand.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 09:30 am
You're killin' me - dead - with that avatar......
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 11:00 am
RichNDanaPoint wrote:
kickycan wrote:
Let's see if we can guess what the Bush/Cheney bootlickers response will be.

I'm going with, "Libby is a disgruntled former staffer and obviously can't be trusted."

Any other guesses?


Oh the famous, but Clinton got a blow job from an intern Laughing


I'm with RNDP on this one.

<made me LOL then sneeze and cough when I read it>
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 11:03 am
The Truth About Lewis "Scooter" Libby's Statements to the Grand Jury Claiming the President Authorized a Leak of Classified Information:
The President and Vice President Are Not In the Clear Yet
By JOHN W. DEAN
----
Friday, Apr. 07, 2006

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald has now revealed in court filings bombshell information that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby told the grand jury investigating the leak of Valerie Plame-Wilson's covert CIA identity. According to Fitzgerald's filings, Libby said that he was authorized by the President and Vice President to leak classified information to New York Times reporter Judith Miller.

This revelation has been accompanied by a number of public misstatements, which call for correction. The most blatant of these is the claim that Fitzgerald's filing indicates that the President authorized the release of Valerie Plame's covert status at the CIA. In fact, the document is conspicuously silent on this fact. The filing does indicate that the President authorized the release of classified information, but it was different information - a National Intelligence Estimate that had been classified pursuant to an executive order.

In addition, conventional wisdom - if that label fits the consensus information that is surfacing on radio and television news shows - has it that this information does not reveal that the President or Vice President did anything illegal. But that claim, too, is not necessarily accurate.

At a minimum, the filing indicates that the President and Vice President departed radically, and disturbingly, from long-set procedures with respect to classified documents - and that the Vice President, in particular, exceeded his declassification authority. And it may indicate that they, too, ought to be targets of the grand jury.
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20060407.html
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 11:25 am
I would like to bring specific attention to the fact that the executive order that allowed Cheney to 'declassify' was signed two weeks into the Wilson affair, if I understand the timeline correctly.

Does this seem to anyone else that Bush passed a law saying it wasn't illegal for them to break the law?

Essentially this amounts to an assertion of presidential authority; will Congress allow this?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 11:45 am
From Blueflame's excellent link:

Quote:
Many commentators are dismissing this situation as run-of-the-mill presidential/vice presidential politics. But I believe it is more serious.

From a political perspective, separate from the illegality, there is the hypocrisy: The Bush Administration has prosecuted and sent to jail officials who leaked far less serious information - as I discussed in detail in a prior column. It is actively, and currently, threatening to prosecute others who have leaked information about the president's illegal electronic surveillance of Americans.

Beyond the hypocrisy, however, is what the President, Vice President, Libby and no doubt others did to destroy the career of Valerie Plame. Maybe the administration has quietly settled with the Wilsons, who seem to have dropped out of the public eye. This would have been wise, because as the facts unravel, it increasingly appears that administration officials did indeed attack Mr. Wilson for his speaking out; the leak of his wife's identity does indeed seem to have been done in harsh retribution. Such a violation of civil rights is a crime.

Finally, even if Bush and Cheney both get away clean of criminal charges, or even the suggestion of criminal conduct, this is still devastating for the Administration. Illegal or not, the President and Vice-President's actions, as recounted by Libby, are ugly in the extreme.

After all, Fitzgerald's filings indicate that, at a bare minimum, these highest of officials played fast and loose with declassification rules as part of a scheme to take an uncalled-for revenge against a critic who dared to question an Iraqi war justification. Even more damning, is that the critic turned out to be right: Weapons of mass destruction have never surfaced, no uranium was sold by Niger to Iraq, and the Administration's call to arms was bogus.

There will be more devastating revelations from the Libby case, I am certain. I have written of this matter in the past, and anticipate writing more in the future. The Commander-in-Chief-can-do-no-wrong veneer is wearing off, thankfully. For a nation that cannot hold its commander-in-chief responsible is something other than a democracy.


Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 12:15 pm
Having watched McClellan bluster on for the last hour, it seems the Administration says that the information contained in the NIE was given out because it was 'in the public interest' to do so.

This is of course ridiculous; it was in his bosses interest to do so. But that's immaterial.

It's immaterial because the information wasn't provided to the public; it was provided to Judy Miller, on the requirement that she said her source was a 'former hill staffer.' Which was a lie. This is the very definition of a leak:

Quote:
A news leak is a disclosure of embargoed information in advance of its official release, or the unsanctioned release of confidential information.


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2005-19,GGLD:en&oi=definer&q=define:news+leak&defl=en

This is highly irregular, to say the least.

This also shows that the Prez and VP started a chain of events to discredit a political opponent of theirs, used classified materials(which they had refused calls to do for months, until they were attacked politically) to discredit the person who was attacking them, and eventually this chain led to the exposure of Valerie Plame.

There also remains a significant chance that either Bush or Cheney lied to Fitz during their unsworn interviews with him. There have been some rumors that this angle will come into the fore pretty soon. Even unsworn, they have an obligation to tell the truth.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 02:45 pm
Evidence Suggests White House Conspiracy
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Thursday 06 April 2006

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald stated in a court filing late Wednesday in the CIA leak case that his investigators have obtained evidence during the course of the two-year-old probe that proves "multiple" White House officials conspired to discredit former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, a critic of the administration's pre-war Iraq intelligence.

This is the first time the special counsel has acknowledged that White House officials are alleged to have engaged in a coordinated effort to undercut the former ambassador's credibility by disseminating classified intelligence information that would have contradicted Wilson's public statements.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040606R.shtml
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 02:49 pm
Sorry if it's already been posted, but Editor and Publisher has a pretty decent synopsis here ...

e and p
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 07:10 pm
Is it not likely that Bush lied to Fitzgerald too?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 06:04 am
A 'Concerted Effort' to Discredit Bush Critic

Quote:
Prosecutor Describes Cheney, Libby as Key Voices Pitching Iraq-Niger Story

As he drew back the curtain this week on the evidence against Vice President Cheney's former top aide, Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald for the first time described a "concerted action" by "multiple people in the White House" -- using classified information -- to "discredit, punish or seek revenge against" a critic of President Bush's war in Iraq.

Bluntly and repeatedly, Fitzgerald placed Cheney at the center of that campaign. Citing grand jury testimony from the vice president's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Fitzgerald fingered Cheney as the first to voice a line of attack that at least three White House officials would soon deploy against former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV.

Cheney, in a conversation with Libby in early July 2003, was said to describe Wilson's CIA-sponsored trip to Niger the previous year -- in which the envoy found no support for charges that Iraq tried to buy uranium there -- as "a junket set up by Mr. Wilson's wife," CIA case officer Valerie Plame.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/13/2025 at 12:06:53