8
   

Fitzgerald Investigation of Leak of Identity of CIA Agent

 
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:29 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
tico wrote:
The constant references to Clinton are very apropos,....

It is NOT apropos. With time, the world environment changes as does the intelligence used by our government. any other...



I might also point out that Clinton told Bush OSL should be his number one priority. Bush disagreed, saying that Iraq would be his number one priorty.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:33 am
kuvasz wrote:
wow, eat some bad turkey did we? you remarks are so objectively wrong, so factually refuted that i won't even waste my time illustrating the madness inherent in your screed.


Then why type anything at all?

Quote:
you are so clueless about reality, you think the Left, whatever that is, liked Clinton.


As quickly as some of them jump to defend him, yes, I've reached that conclusion.

Quote:
in an encyclopedic list of stupid things you have said around here that is about the stupidest


Coming from you that means ... absolutely nothing to me.

Quote:
but truth be told, I especially got a hearty laugh from how an attorney specializing in non-fault divorces and real estate maligns political opponents for leaving problem solving to others. if there is a more parasitic livihood on the planet, it has yet to be invented.


I'm not that kind of attorney. But you have made your view of all lawyers known on these fora. You appear to not like your partners very well. Oh well ...
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:33 am
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
unbelievable, he takes one quote from OBL and extrapolates it to "prove" Clinton caused 9/11.

Really, his views are so out of touch with reality, they are not even worthy of refutation.


It was OBL who said Clinton embolded al Queda. You accused me of "revisionist history." Are you standing by that statement?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:34 am
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
tico wrote:
The constant references to Clinton are very apropos,....

It is NOT apropos. With time, the world environment changes as does the intelligence used by our government. any other...



I might also point out that Clinton told Bush OSL should be his number one priority. Bush disagreed, saying that Iraq would be his number one priorty.


Talk about revisionist history.
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:43 am
Better check your facts, Tico. You no longer warrant serious rebuttal here.

You just deny everything. You have become an A2K laughing stock.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:49 am
Ticomaya wrote:
kuvasz wrote:
wow, eat some bad turkey did we? you remarks are so objectively wrong, so factually refuted that i won't even waste my time illustrating the madness inherent in your screed.


Then why type anything at all?

simply to show you that you are full of shitt

Quote:
you are so clueless about reality, you think the Left, whatever that is, liked Clinton.


As quickly as some of them jump to defend him, yes, I've reached that conclusion.

so, you admit that you don't know what you are talking about. and employ the methods of those you dispise

Quote:
in an encyclopedic list of stupid things you have said around here that is about the stupidest


Coming from you that means ... absolutely nothing to me.

of course, you are a legend in your own mind and your infallibility makes you Pope Tico. i bet you walk around with a pointy hat to go with that pointy head too

Quote:
but truth be told, I especially got a hearty laugh from how an attorney specializing in non-fault divorces and real estate maligns political opponents for leaving problem solving to others. if there is a more parasitic livihood on the planet, it has yet to be invented.


I'm not that kind of attorney. But you have made your view of all lawyers known on these fora. You appear to not like your partners very well. Oh well ...


yes you are. you are exactly that kind of an attomey, one who castigates those who actually work to build and improve upon things as you play with words for your livelihood.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:52 am
tico, It is NOT revisionist history. That Clinton told Bush about OBL is outweighed by more current intelligence info. Bush failed to follow through on OBL, and instead started his unwarranted war in Iraq that posed no threats to America or Americans. With Bush's misguided war, over 17,000 of our men and women in uniform have been injured or killed, and by best estimates some 100,000 innocent Iraqis have been killed by our coalition forces. All this for what? More of the same; "stay the course." The true consequences are still unknown.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:53 am
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
Better check your facts, Tico. You no longer warrant serious rebuttal here.

You just deny everything. You have become an A2K laughing stock.


LOL. Better yet, you check your facts and get back to me with substantiation, if any ... as I did when you questioned my facts.


And you must have forgotten who is the resident A2K laughingstock. Need I remind you about .... THIS POST, where I proved you had been trying to lie to everyone here on A2K.

It is you whose veracity has been shown to be highly doubtful.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:55 am
Kuvasz: More scroll material? Let's try this: When you have something to say, why don't you warn me somehow?
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:59 am
My pathetic, petty little man. I had personal reasons for posting as TPN, none of which concern you. Your attempt to dig into my personal business and your fixation on me is but another illustration as to why you have become A2K's number one laughing stock.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:03 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
tico, It is NOT revisionist history. That Clinton told Bush about OBL is outweighed by more current intelligence info. Bush failed to follow through on OBL, and instead started his unwarranted war in Iraq that posed no threats to America or Americans. With Bush's misguided war, over 17,000 of our men and women in uniform have been injured or killed, and by best estimates some 100,000 innocent Iraqis have been killed by our coalition forces. All this for what? More of the same; "stay the course." The true consequences are still unknown.


c.i.: Are you sure you want to rise to the defense of Harper/Chrissee/Nikki? He/She said: "I might also point out that Clinton told Bush OSL should be his number one priority. Bush disagreed, saying that Iraq would be his number one priorty."

Firstly, I take Chrissee literally when she attributes words to Bush. She said he said "Iraq would be his number one priority." Now did he or did he not say that?

Following 9/11, Bush did not go after Saddam initially. He went after bin Laden in Afghanistan. After bin Laden scurried off to hide in a cave somewhere, focus was turned to Saddam.

But when you use words like "unwarranted," and "misguided," it's clear you don't properly appreciate the need to go into Iraq, and therefore you are not thinking clearly about this issue.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:04 am
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
My pathetic, petty little man. I had personal reasons for posting as TPN, none of which concern you. Your attempt to dig into my personal business and your fixation on me is but another illustration as to why you have become A2K's number one laughing stock.


Oh, so you had personal reasons for lying to everyone here? Well, in that case, nevermind.
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:05 am
Ticomaya wrote:
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
Better check your facts, Tico. You no longer warrant serious rebuttal here.

You just deny everything. You have become an A2K laughing stock.


LOL. Better yet, you check your facts and get back to me with substantiation, if any ... as I did when you questioned my facts.



Too funny, in the mind of a Denialista, suddenly OBL is a speaker of truth. If that is the case, one must accept EVERYTHING he says:

Quote:
After our victory in Afghanistan and the defeat of the oppressors who had killed millions of Muslims, the legend about the invincibility of the superpowers vanished. Our boys no longer viewed America as a superpower. So, when they left Afghanistan, they went to Somalia and prepared themselves carefully for a long war. They had thought that the Americans were like the Russians, so they trained and prepared. They were stunned when they discovered how low was the morale of the American soldier. America had entered with 30,000 soldiers in addition to thousands of soldiers from different countries in the world. ... As I said, our boys were shocked by the low morale of the American soldier and they realized that the American soldier was just a paper tiger. He was unable to endure the strikes that were dealt to his army, so he fled, and America had to stop all its bragging and all that noise it was making in the press after the Gulf War in which it destroyed the infrastructure and the milk and dairy industry that was vital for the infants and the children and the civilians and blew up dams which were necessary for the crops people grew to feed their families. Proud of this destruction, America assumed the titles of world leader and master of the new world order. After a few blows, it forgot all about those titles and rushed out of Somalia in shame and disgrace, dragging the bodies of its soldiers. America stopped calling itself world leader and master of the new world order, and its politicians realized that those titles were too big for them and that they were unworthy of them. I was in Sudan when this happened. I was very happy to learn of that great defeat that America suffered, so was every Muslim. ...
.

Really, Osama? After Somalia, America stopped calling itself a world leader? Every Muslim was happy? Really, Osama, speaker of truth? America is proud of killing babies. Really, Osama? You say it, it must be true.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:06 am
If it's not my statement, you can investigate what was actually said, and report back to us. Ain't gonna go looking for ya.
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:07 am
Ticomaya wrote:
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
My pathetic, petty little man. I had personal reasons for posting as TPN, none of which concern you. Your attempt to dig into my personal business and your fixation on me is but another illustration as to why you have become A2K's number one laughing stock.


Oh, so you had personal reasons for lying to everyone here? Well, in that case, nevermind.



I didn't lie to everybody. You are out of control. As you continue with this, all you do is expose yourself for what you are. Petty, fixated and pathetic.

And a laughing stock.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:09 am
My post 1690221:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tico wrote:
The constant references to Clinton are very apropos,....

It is NOT apropos. With time, the world environment changes as does the intelligence used by our government. By going back to a previous administration, it leaves open the possibility to criticize all past administrations for their mistakes to equalize the current administration's mistakes.

Trying to rationalize the mistakes of current administrations by looking at the past does nothing to further the future progress of this country - nor any other. ..

The past is past; it can't be changed.

We are talking about Bushco and all the mistakes made by this administration on Iraq; failure to understand anything about the history of Iraq, and not planning for any exit strategy once involved.

Cheney said the Iraqis will welcome us as liberators. We have thus far killed almost 100,000 innocent Iraqis. Who did we liberate?

You still didn't answer my question.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:28 am
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
My pathetic, petty little man. I had personal reasons for posting as TPN, none of which concern you. Your attempt to dig into my personal business and your fixation on me is but another illustration as to why you have become A2K's number one laughing stock.


Oh, so you had personal reasons for lying to everyone here? Well, in that case, nevermind.



I didn't lie to everybody. You are out of control. As you continue with this, all you do is expose yourself for what you are. Petty, fixated and pathetic.

And a laughing stock.
'

What do you mean you didn't lie to everybody? You think you only lied to those who read your words? Okay, I'll accept that. You only tried to lie to everyone at A2K.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:30 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
...

Who did we liberate?

You still didn't answer my question.


You want answers? Well, as you said .... I ain't gonna go looking for ya. Why don't you go ask Cheney?
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:33 am
Tico, again, you continue to demonstrate why you are a laughing stock with your inablity to stop trying to pry into my personal life.

Keep it up though, each subsequent post diminishes you a bit more.
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 11:36 am
Ticomaya wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
...

Who did we liberate?

You still didn't answer my question.


You want answers? Well, as you said .... I ain't gonna go looking for ya. Why don't you go ask Cheney?


Because he doesn't post here. Mind answering the question?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/10/2025 at 07:00:08