8
   

Fitzgerald Investigation of Leak of Identity of CIA Agent

 
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 04:23 pm
I have to wonder if Scooter was ever alone with Bush in the Oval ofice.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 05:14 pm
Dys
dyslexia wrote:
I have to wonder if Scooter was ever alone with Bush in the Oval ofice.


If so, he would have to leave his cigar behind.

BBB
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 05:34 pm
au1929 wrote:
He is this administrations Oliver North.
I have little doubt that Cheney was the mad scientist behind the outing of Palme.


Yup. That, or you have to believe that Cheney's chief-of-staff was "freelancing", and Cheney knew nothing about it.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 06:11 pm
parados wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Based upon a plain reading of the indictment, it would appear so.

But then we've not heard what Libby has to say. He may challenge the facts as alleged. We'll have to see.

Tico,
In response to your question of Clinton lying....

Based upon a plain reading of the impeachment, it would appear so.

But then we've not heard what Clinton has to say. He may challenge the facts as alleged. We'll have to see.


Laughing Oh, but we have heard what Clinton had to say. Those were the lies, in his deposition, remember? Do you need another recap?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 06:32 pm
'Official A' stands out in indictment

By PETE YOST
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

WASHINGTON -- In a sign of the trouble lingering for the Bush administration, the indictment handed up Friday in the CIA leak probe refers to someone at the White House known as "Official A."

The unidentified official could become a courtroom witness against I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, who left his job as vice presidential aide shortly after his indictment on charges of obstruction of justice, making false statements and perjury.

Although other officials are mentioned but not named in the indictment, all were identified Friday afternoon during briefings at the Justice Department.

Except for "Official A."

The mysterious official is identified in the indictment only as "a senior official in the White House."

No mention is made of Karl Rove, the president's political adviser who remains under investigation by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald.


It has been known that columnist Robert Novak spoke to Rove on July 9, 2003, saying he planned to report over the weekend that Valerie Plame, the wife of Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson, had worked for the CIA. Rove told the columnist he had heard similar information.

Friday's indictment says "Official A" is a "senior official in the White House who advised Libby on July 10 or 11 of 2003" about a chat with Novak about his upcoming column in which Plame would be identified as a CIA employee.

Late Friday, three people close to the investigation, each asking to remain unidentified because of grand jury secrecy, identified Rove as Official A.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 06:44 pm
let us hope that Libby has better security than the Dallas Police Force.

http://www.maebrussell.com/Disappearing%20Witnesses/Ruby%20Oswald.gif

If Libby falls down in the shower and dies, or even if a bolt of lightening happens to strike him, all hell will break loose.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 06:57 pm
kuvasz wrote:
If Libby falls down in the shower and dies, or even if a bolt of lightening happens to strike him, all hell will break loose.


Yet another one confusing Bush with Clinton. Remember Vince Foster's "suicide"? The "Clinton Body Count"? :wink:
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 07:39 pm
Fox news has been a lot of fun to watch tonight.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 07:42 pm
Oh I bet!!!

Gimme some highlights...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 07:42 pm
At Townhall, "top news" page...not a peep concerning today's indictment as of this posting.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 07:48 pm
blatham wrote:
At Townhall, "top news" page...not a peep concerning today's indictment as of this posting.


I looked and it's right there at the top of the main page, under "Also of Interest."

I didn't know anybody went to Townhall.com for news. I certainly never have. I go there for the columns and opinions.

Oh, well. Suit yourself.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 07:49 pm
blatham wrote:
Fox news has been a lot of fun to watch tonight.


Did you enjoy Mary Matlin's appearance?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 07:50 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
blatham wrote:
At Townhall, "top news" page...not a peep concerning today's indictment as of this posting.


I looked and it's right there at the top of the main page, under "Also of Interest."


The link is to the smokinggun website and shows the actual indictment.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 07:54 pm
Yup, I missed it there (in with the pie receipes).

And LOVED Mary!!! Scooter as the paradigm example of truth and integrity in civil service to the nation is just how I see the situation as well. What could be more obvious than that? But I am a little uncomfortable to see she's taking beauty, weight and makeup tips from Katherine Harris.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 08:09 pm
See ... and I missed the pie recipes.


Yeah, I thought you'd appreciate Matlin's take. Now, I'm trying to figure out who moves their mouth the least when they talk, Mary Matlin or Greta Van Susteren ...
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 08:45 pm
Fitzmas finally got here and all we got was a crappy Scooter.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 08:48 pm
Brand X wrote:
Fitzmas finally got here and all we got was a crappy Scooter.


Laughing
0 Replies
 
roverroad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 09:08 pm
revel wrote:
What I don't understand is why they would have held an investigation into whether a crime was committed for so long, wouldn't it have been a simple matter for them know what Plame's status as a CIA employee was? Also wouldn't they have had to have at least good cause to believe a crime was committed in order to justify the grand jury investigation?


Republicans weren't saying that when Kenneth Star investigated Clinton for several years to try to nab him with something. Starting out with Whitewater and ending with a blow job. Why was that ok and this investigation seems ridiculous to you?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2005 09:16 pm
roverroad wrote:
revel wrote:
What I don't understand is why they would have held an investigation into whether a crime was committed for so long, wouldn't it have been a simple matter for them know what Plame's status as a CIA employee was? Also wouldn't they have had to have at least good cause to believe a crime was committed in order to justify the grand jury investigation?


Republicans weren't saying that when Kenneth Star investigated Clinton for several years to try to nab him with something. Starting out with Whitewater and ending with a blow job. Why was that ok and this investigation seems ridiculous to you?


I love it when lefties bicker amongst themselves. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2005 12:11 am
roverroad wrote:
revel wrote:
What I don't understand is why they would have held an investigation into whether a crime was committed for so long, wouldn't it have been a simple matter for them know what Plame's status as a CIA employee was? Also wouldn't they have had to have at least good cause to believe a crime was committed in order to justify the grand jury investigation?


Republicans weren't saying that when Kenneth Star investigated Clinton for several years to try to nab him with something. Starting out with Whitewater and ending with a blow job. Why was that ok and this investigation seems ridiculous to you?



revel, when people obstruct justice to such an extent as this Libby thug, when a major witness refuses to testify, it is awful hard to get to the truth. Fitzgerald has done an excellent job, he has laid the groundwork to breaking this stonewall. There is no doubt that Libby is protecting Cheney and Cheney is insulating Bush.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.51 seconds on 02/07/2025 at 07:13:42