8
   

Fitzgerald Investigation of Leak of Identity of CIA Agent

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 02:59 pm
mysteryman wrote:


Tell me,what should be done with politicians that lie,especially when those lies are criminal?


Yesterday, we were presented with a perfect example of what should be done.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:00 pm
JTT wrote:
mysteryman wrote:


Tell me,what should be done with politicians that lie,especially when those lies are criminal?


Yesterday, we were presented with a perfect example of what should be done.


To ALL politicians whose lies are criminal,no matter what the lie is about?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:04 pm
Perhaps you better look up the defination of "criminal", mm.

mysteryman wrote:
Tell me,what should be done with politicians that lie,especially when those lies are criminal?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:14 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Perhaps you better look up the defination of "criminal", mm.

mysteryman wrote:
Tell me,what should be done with politicians that lie,especially when those lies are criminal?


Since you dont seem to understand what I meant by criminal,here is a whole page of definitions for you to peruse at your leisure...

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/criminal

Now,since Libby was convicted of the CRIMINAL act of lying to the prosecutor AND the grand jury,should all politicians that have done the same thing be prosecuted and if convicted be sentenced to jail?

No matter how small a lie it was?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:16 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Perhaps you better look up the defination of "criminal", mm.

mysteryman wrote:
Tell me,what should be done with politicians that lie,especially when those lies are criminal?


Since you dont seem to understand what I meant by criminal,here is a whole page of definitions for you to peruse at your leisure...

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/criminal

Now,since Libby was convicted of the CRIMINAL act of lying to the prosecutor AND the grand jury,should all politicians that have done the same thing be prosecuted and if convicted be sentenced to jail?

No matter how small a lie it was?


The Federal prosecutor has the discretion to decide which cases deserve attention and which do not. None of the prosecutors in question in this case were Dems, by the way; so there's really no reason to throw around 'political witch hunt' accusations.

Your question posits a black/white view of the law, which doesn't exist. For example, should all those who break the speed limit be ticketed, even if it's just 1 or 2 miles over? Of course not. It's a discretion thing.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:21 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Perhaps you better look up the defination of "criminal", mm.

mysteryman wrote:
Tell me,what should be done with politicians that lie,especially when those lies are criminal?


Since you dont seem to understand what I meant by criminal,here is a whole page of definitions for you to peruse at your leisure...

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/criminal

Now,since Libby was convicted of the CRIMINAL act of lying to the prosecutor AND the grand jury,should all politicians that have done the same thing be prosecuted and if convicted be sentenced to jail?

No matter how small a lie it was?


The Federal prosecutor has the discretion to decide which cases deserve attention and which do not. None of the prosecutors in question in this case were Dems, by the way; so there's really no reason to throw around 'political witch hunt' accusations.

Your question posits a black/white view of the law, which doesn't exist. For example, should all those who break the speed limit be ticketed, even if it's just 1 or 2 miles over? Of course not. It's a discretion thing.

Cycloptichorn


I am not throwing around any "political witch hunt" accusations.
I dont think it was a witch hunt.

As for having a "black/white" view of the law,whats wrong with that?
The law is black and white.
Something is either legal or it isnt.

Using your example of speeding,YES every person that is speeding and gets caught should be ticketed,no matter how much over they were going.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:25 pm
Obstruction of justice was no little thing. I think there's more heads to roll before this is over. The obstruction finding will open doors to exactly what was obstructed. A vast White House conspiracy to out a covert CIA who played a great and important role in national security. Certainly the jury wondered where's Rove and Cheney? We may see them under oath on tv yet.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:33 pm
blueflame1 wrote:
Obstruction of justice was no little thing. I think there's more heads to roll before this is over. The obstruction finding will open doors to exactly what was obstructed. A vast White House conspiracy to out a covert CIA who played a great and important role in national security. Certainly the jury wondered where's Rove and Cheney? We may see them under oath on tv yet.


Should EVERY politician accused and convicted of obstruction of justice,no matter how small,be sent to prison?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:34 pm
mysteryman wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
okie wrote:
then what are we poor serfs supposed to conclude about this?


one of the things that will hopefully, eventually be learned is that lying by people in the White House is not acceptable. For any reason.


So its no longer acceptable to lie about sex,or to lie about billing records,or to lie about stealing papers from the national archives,or to lie about tape recordings,or to lie about travel office employees,or to lie about someones name being leaked,or to lie about making money on the futures market,or to lie about anything else politicians lie about?

Tell me,what should be done with politicians that lie,especially when those lies are criminal?



MM, please be fair. People went to jail over the billing records and the stolen papers. What were the lies about tape recordings and the travel- office matter (I know of none)? There was no proven lie about the futures thing. Libby perjured himself before a grand jury and got convicted for this. Are you not glad about this? You should be.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:38 pm
mysteryman wrote:
blueflame1 wrote:
Obstruction of justice was no little thing. I think there's more heads to roll before this is over. The obstruction finding will open doors to exactly what was obstructed. A vast White House conspiracy to out a covert CIA who played a great and important role in national security. Certainly the jury wondered where's Rove and Cheney? We may see them under oath on tv yet.


Should EVERY politician accused and convicted of obstruction of justice,no matter how small,be sent to prison?


Everyone who is convicted of a crime should serve the penalty for that crime, determined by the court.

This is how the American system of law works, yo

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:43 pm
Advocate wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
ehBeth wrote:
okie wrote:
then what are we poor serfs supposed to conclude about this?


one of the things that will hopefully, eventually be learned is that lying by people in the White House is not acceptable. For any reason.


So its no longer acceptable to lie about sex,or to lie about billing records,or to lie about stealing papers from the national archives,or to lie about tape recordings,or to lie about travel office employees,or to lie about someones name being leaked,or to lie about making money on the futures market,or to lie about anything else politicians lie about?

Tell me,what should be done with politicians that lie,especially when those lies are criminal?



MM, please be fair. People went to jail over the billing records and the stolen papers. What were the lies about tape recordings and the travel- office matter (I know of none)? There was no proven lie about the futures thing. Libby perjured himself before a grand jury and got convicted for this. Are you not glad about this? You should be.


If he lied,then I am glad he got convicted.
I have said that before.

What people went to jail over the billing records from the Rose Law Firm that mysteriously dissappeared from the White House residence,then miraculously reappeared after the case was over?
Who went to jail for the stealing of records from the National Archives by one of Clintons old staff members?

As for the tape recordings,surely you remember Watergate?

As for the TRavel office staff and the known lies...

THat was when the travel office staff in the WH were charged with criminal activities.
They were all aquitted,and it turned out that Hillary had instigated it just to get those people replaced.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 03:59 pm
It was Armitage who told Novak about Valerie Plame, not Rove.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/07/eveningnews/printable1981433.shtml
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 04:02 pm
mysteryman wrote:

Since you dont seem to understand what I meant by criminal,here is a whole page of definitions for you to peruse at your leisure...


Well, it seems your academic credentials in law are better than mine.

However, I use for legal definitions ... law sources.
Seems to be different to what you were taught at your law school.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 04:11 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
mysteryman wrote:

Since you dont seem to understand what I meant by criminal,here is a whole page of definitions for you to peruse at your leisure...


Well, it seems your academic credentials in law are better than mine.

However, I use for legal definitions ... law sources.
Seems to be different to what you were taught at your law school.


Then try this one,from a legal dictionary...

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/criminal

or this one...

http://dictionary.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/results.pl?co=dictionary.lp.findlaw.com&topic=a9/a9644ff4713d7c8e4d8236a3bc60eaf4

I'm sure there are others you can find,but that should do for a start.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 04:22 pm
mm, you're joking, right?

Even my Merriam-Webster is not only newer but gives longer asnd more definitions than your randomly choosen free dictionaries.

You should try "Sui generis" online or - even better - one of the many printed compendia.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 04:26 pm
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 04:52 pm
mysteryman wrote:
So its no longer acceptable to lie about sex,or to lie about billing records,or to lie about stealing papers from the national archives,or to lie about tape recordings,or to lie about travel office employees,or to lie about someones name being leaked,or to lie about making money on the futures market,or to lie about anything else politicians lie about?


You may well find these things acceptable. I don't.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 04:59 pm
blueflame, More useless rhetoric from Bush. He lies so normally, he doesn't understand why Americans now distrust him. When the case first came out, he said "anybody in my administration that's found leaking this information will be taken care of." Followed by "anybody convicted of a crime in my administration will not work in my administration." Now, it's "we've got to respect that conviction."

We shall see, but I give it a 67/33 chance he'll pardon Libby before he leaves office.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 05:02 pm
cicerone, Just cause I posted the article dont mean I believe it. Bushie will pardon Libby unless he himself gets caught up in the outting. There are further investigations ahead.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2007 05:03 pm
From CNN:

President vows to fire anyone who committed a crime
Tuesday, July 19, 2005; Posted: 3:47 a.m. EDT (07:47 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush appeared to backtrack Monday from his 2004 pledge to fire anyone involved in leaking the name of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

"I think it's best if people wait until the investigation is complete before you jump to conclusions," Bush said at a joint news conference with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

"I would like this to end as quickly as possible so we know the facts. And if someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration," Bush said.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/01/2025 at 08:39:52