Bartikus wrote:I am unable to supply you with what you need, Chumly. The fact that you won't tell me whether an unborn human can ever be murdered says it all.
That you are unable to supply me with what I need is patently false. Why? Because you supplied the rest of your scenario in reasonable detail, but then would not tell me what the man's views were on actually hurting the mother. If you were able to tell me what the man's views were on the purpose of kicking the mother, I am sure you could have told me the man's views on actually hurting the mother!
As to the statistical data, I told you a number of times that you can make it up if you wish, and that it only pertained to the survival chances of the fetus at 4 ½ months. How hard could that be?
Further I never said any such thing that I "won't tell you whether an unborn human can ever be murdered". I simply asked you first to define your terms in a general way which you fully ignored in it's entirety. After fully ignoring that you presented a specific scenario as an allegory. I then asked for enough information to provide an assessment.
You provided a goodly amount of information about your allegorical scenario but not quite enough, and are still refusing claiming "I am unable to supply you with what you need".
How do you expect me to have a normal dialogue when you ignore my posts when it suits you, make totally unrealistic claims such as I "won't tell you whether an unborn human can ever be murdered" and won't provide the basic simple information of an allegorical scenario of your own making?
