@bulmabriefs144,
Give up the idiotic belief, that the man Jesus could have been a woman, I'd hate to see you make an absolute fool of yourself.
bulmabriefs144 wrote ….. The larger Church believes in "begotten not made"
The Anointed responds ….. I know, and that’s just another lie that they attempt to perpetrate on the gullible. It is not to be found in their scriptures.
Those lies were never challenged when the church believed that it held the spiritual power over the temporal rulers of the world, which rulers had to beg for an audience with the pope. No one dared to challenge the false teachings of the Roman church, for fear of being condemned as a heretic and burned at the stake.
From the
GOOD NEWS STUDY EDITION of the Catholic bible, Acts 3: 19-20; Repent, then, and turn to God, so that he will forgive your sins. If you do, times of spiritual strength will come from the Lord, and he will send Jesus, who is the Messiah he has already ‘
CHOSEN’ for you.
Luke 9: 34-35; While he was still speaking, a cloud appeared and covered them with its shadow; and the disciples were afraid as the cloud came over them. A voice said from the cloud, “This is my Son, whom I have ‘
CHOSEN’ — listen to him!”
Isaiah 42: 1-2; “Here is my servant, whom I strengthen — the one I have ‘
CHOSEN’, with whom I am pleased. I have filled him with my Spirit, and he will bring justice to every nation.
Deuteronomy 18:18-19; YHVH, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, says to Moses; "I will send them a prophet like you from among their own people; I will put
MY WORDS in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command, and whosoever will not heed
MY WORDS, which he shall speak in
MY NAME, I will punish, etc.
My WORDS are spirit said the Lord.
Peter confirms that Jesus was that man, when, concerning the man Jesus, he says in. Acts 3: 22; For Moses said; "The Lord your God will send you a prophet, just as he sent me, and he will be one of your own people, etc."
Did the people of his day believe that he was the Lord, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The God of our ancestors? No, they did not, for on the day of his triumphant entry into Jerusalem, the people escorting him cried out,
"BLESSED IS HE WHO COMES IN THE NAME OF THE LORD" Verifying that they believed Jesus to be the one that God had promised Moses that he would choose from among the Israelites, and send to the people to speak in his name.
Acts 17 31; For he has fixed a day in which he will judge the whole world with justice by means of a ‘
MAN’ he has ‘
CHOSEN’. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising that ‘
MAN’ from death!”
Whereas, the scripture twisting theologians of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine, Those who would have you believe that Jesus was a god who became a man, changed the original verse, in Luke 3: 22; which originally read, “and the Holy Spirit came down upon him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven, “Thou art my son,
THIS DAY I have begotten thee, to; “and the Holy Spirit came down upon him in bodily form like a dove. And a voice came from heaven, “You are my own dear Son. I am pleased with you.”
In Luke 3: 22; (In place of “Thou art my beloved son in who I am well pleased.”) The following authorities of the second, third, and fourth centuries read, “This day I have begotten thee,” vouched for by Codex D, and the most ancient copies of the old latin (a, b. c. ff.I), by Justin Martyr (AD 140), Clemens Alex, (AD. 190), Methodius (AD. 290), among the Greeks. And among the Latins, Lactaitius (AD 300), Hilary (AD) Juvencus (AD. 330), Faustus (AD. 400) and Augustine. All these oldest manuscripts were changed completely. They now read, “This is my son in whom I am well pleased.” Whereas the original variant was, “Thou art my Son. '
THIS DAY' I have begotten thee.”
Hebrew 5: 5; has; “You are my son, ‘
TODAY’ I have become your Father.”
Not only do the scripture twisting theologians of the Roman church, change the original scriptures to make them appear to support their false teaching of the supposed virgin birth, the also add their own interpolations.
Luke 3:23; (KJV) And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being
(as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
The
(AS WAS SUPPOSED) in brackets, was a later interpolation by those who would have you believe the false teaching of the so-called virgin birth.
In the different translations of the KJV into Arabic, Afrikaan, Zulu, etc and even some of the more modern English translations, such as the Good News Catholic Study Edition Bible, the words (
As was supposed) have been retained, but the brackets are removed, thus by, making those words appear to be the declaration of Luke, while the serious biblical student know that they were not written by Luke, but were a later interpolation and a corruption of the Holy Scriptures, by those Christians, who refuse to accept that Jesus was not a God who became a man, but a man, born of human parents, who was later
CHOSEN by the Lord our saviour ‘The Son of Man,’ as his heir and successor, and who was given divine glory, as revealed in Acts 3: 13; where it is said that the God of our ancestors, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, has given divine glory to his servant Jesus etc.
Now, you may be gullible enough to believe the larger Church’s false teaching that Jesus was
“begotten not made." But I will continue to believe the Holy Scriptures, which state that Jesus the son of Mary and Joseph ben Alexander Helios =Heli, was ‘
CHOSEN’ by the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as his heir and successor.