Reply
Fri 22 Jul, 2005 05:05 am
I suppose it worked for....
Quote:The party constitution filed with the secretary of state's office says: "We as representatives of the White Race(s) hereby declare that all policies and decisions to be made shall be governed and decided by whether it is good for our people, non-Jewish people of wholly European descent."
Faaaaaaaaaaaarkkkkkk!
There are no NEW ideas, only the same BS endlessly repeated. Soon, those 'white' people will start dividing themselved into 'white people not descended from French people' and ' 'white people who worship at a Roman Catholic Church' or 'white people who live in neighbourhoods with black people or Asians or Native Americans or -- God forbid -- a Canadian!!!' and they will be forced to burn crosses and kill those 'race-traitors'.
One would think that we were WAY beyond this sh*t!!!
More than likely the lines of demarcation will orient themselves around diet. The boiled dinner eaters against the steak and spuds against the roast beef against the glazed hammers. Rice burners and chitterlings against the frijoles.
But Dys, what about us half-breeds? I'm half steak and spuds and half roast beef. Does this mean I will be dispised by all? Please tell me there is hope for me. Please.
The only proper way to divide people is as to whether they crack their eggs from the large end or the small end.
Oh no, I crack them from the middle. This isn't looking too good for me right now. I seem to be an outcast any which way you look at it.
I've long pegged you as a follower of Lestrog, CostalRat. I admire your literal interpretation and I share your beliefs. I'm happy to be in the company of another true-believer.
BBB
I don't crack eggs. I suck the oozy slime from a small hole I make in the shell.
Does this weird (unAmerican) trait mean I will rot in hell?
BBB
What a Yahoo!
(And I don't mean the search engine.)
Is there a synonym for Houynhnm? (A couple of fine specimens on the left there
)
who'll want to join my party : i cut my hard-boiled eggs in half before scooping them out.
sometimes a like a bit of lox , at other times a bit of chili sauce on the side; sometimes i just add a dash of pepper. what should i call my party ?
contributions gratefully accepted. hbg
p.s. please send cash, no cheques/checks. i do accept both canadian and american currency
hamburger wrote:who'll want to join my party : i cut my hard-boiled eggs in half before scooping them out.
sometimes a like a bit of lox , at other times a bit of chili sauce on the side; sometimes i just add a dash of pepper. what should i call my party ?
contributions gratefully accepted. hbg
Not sure, but it would appear to be a party of eggstremists!!
As always - I am at a loss to define 'white'. WTF do these people think is 'white'?
In Australia, we had a 'White Australia' policy. It sort of meant that people from Britain were given precedence in migration. It also meant that we forcibly repatriated Pacific Islanders.
It didn't really come to grips with the historical fact that for like 60,000 years the ONLY inhabitants of Australia were blackfellahs! White Australia? Say what?
And the First Fleet that delivered a mass of white criminals (and their semi-criminal handlers) also had Africans - more blackfellahs - so there was never a time that the imported variety of Australian was ever totally white. And yeah, the Irish were both, non-British and as Celts and Catholics, even lower down the rung than the indigenous Australians.....
If I sound just
a bit peeved it might be because one of our 'finest, an academic has decided to mouth off....
Quote:Prof Fraser, who has taught at the university for 29 years, was last week cautioned over a letter in his local suburban newspaper in which he claimed Australia was becoming a Third World colony by allowing non-white immigration.
He claimed African migration increased crime and he believed HSC results pointed to a rising ruling class of Asians.
He wanted Australia to withdraw from refugee conventions to avoid becoming "a colony of the Third World".
Looks like Macquarie is trying to get rid of him. They want to pay him out of his contract, then he can avail himself of free speech. I disagree with him but when the corporatist university tells its academics they can no longer speak out we've well and truly lost it.
Not sure about the 'free speech' part.
He's just offering his 'opinions' on a subject that isn't quite within his field of expertise (it's Public Law) and he's not doing it in an academic way either - it is the local paper, not a vetted journal article.
I'm not sure he can identify himself as an Associate Professor of the University (and he did) and still expect them to sit on their hands. It's all very odd, I think that maybe some 'ethnic' cut him off at a roundabout or something.....
Mr Stillwater wrote:As always - I am at a loss to define 'white'. WTF do these people think is 'white'?
Michael Jackson. I think he would qualify.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace