@htam9876,
Come on htam9876…..I am not the stubborn one …you are.The magnetism theory is just a theory!!!…nothing more.
A theory that you, with you mathematical skills could easily prove wrong.Therefore, prove that the top level principles are wrong and then we can knock all this debate on the head and move on.
I have explained that there is the potential for +/- magnetic force “toggling” in the cosmos.
The magnetism theory states that the tilt/rotation speed/distance between stars/planets/holes, if they are precise, could potentially fix these objects in orbit in a balanced state.The toggling of the +/- magnetic forces being possible due to the tilt.
According to the theory it is no accident that Holes and Stars are spinning at faster rates and that this is producing stronger attractive/repulsive magnetic forces.
Also, I will ask you once again why are you referring to -/+…+/- logic ? The magnetism doesn’t utilise this logic,it utilises -/-…..-/+….+/-….+/+ toggling logic.
The magnetism theory states that + and - magnetic forces cannot be identical or else the output of all the above logic combinations would be the same. You therefore require toggling +/- forces in the magnetism theory calculations i.e.
Toggling +/- forces = Toggling +/- forces
I believe that scientists have know found evidence of this toggling effect, so why are you so upset?
If the magnetism theory principles don’t work then fair enough…I don’t have a problem with that.
I do have a problem with the gravity theory though because, for me,it doesn’t correlate with other scientific principles in nature like magnetic force interactions.
Added to this we know that all stars/planets/holes are electromagnets and that the cosmos at all levels (macro/ micro) is full of electromagnetic fields which needs to be the case because if you didn’t have these electromagnetic fields then you would get the spin of the star/planets/holes.
Which bit of all this are you struggling with?
ITS JUST A THEORY!!!