12
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 03:46 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Still, a bright-eyed lady at the supermarket flirted with me today so it's not as if it's all hopeless.


Did you get his name and number?
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 03:52 am
@Builder,
Go to bed.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 04:01 am
Quote:
In a Washington Post op-ed today, House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) offered House Republicans a “path to a better place” than the “dysfunction and rancor they have allowed to engulf the House.” Democrats have repeatedly offered both in public and in private to enter into a bipartisan governing coalition, he wrote, but under former House speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Republicans have “categorically rejected making changes to the rules [in order] to…encourage bipartisan governance and undermine the ability of extremists to hold Congress hostage.”

Jeffries offered to work with willing Republicans “to reform the rules of the House in a manner that permits us to govern in a pragmatic fashion.” Stating up front his willingness to negotiate, Jeffries wrote that the House “should be restructured to promote governance by consensus and facilitate up-or-down votes on bills that have strong bipartisan support.” This would stop a few extremist Republicans from preventing “common-sense legislation from ever seeing the light of day.”

Jeffries called for “traditional Republicans” to “break with the MAGA extremism that has poisoned the House of Representatives since the violent insurrection on Jan[uary] 6, 2021, and its aftermath.”

“House Democrats remain committed to a bipartisan path forward,” he wrote, but “we simply need Republican partners willing to break with MAGA extremism, reform the highly partisan House rules that were adopted at the beginning of this Congress and join us in finding common good for the people.”

Jeffries is reaching out at a delicate moment for Republicans. While the minority leader’s appeal to what is best for the country is an important reminder of what is at stake here, there are also political currents running under the surface of the speaker crisis. The speaker vote will force Republicans to go on the record either for or against former president Trump, a declaration most have so far been able to avoid.

There is enormous pressure from pro-Trump MAGA Republicans to stick with the former president and elect his chosen candidate, Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH), as House speaker. But Jordan is a very close ally of Trump’s and can be expected to demand an end to investigations into the former president in exchange for doing even the most basic business—Trump, after all, demanded a government shutdown until the cases against him were abandoned. Throwing the speakership to him will mean facing the 2024 election with a fully committed Trump party and government dysfunction as the Republicans’ main argument for why voters should back them.

That might play well in the gerrymandered districts of the extremists, but there are 18 Republicans who won election in districts President Biden won in 2020, and they will not want to run on a ticket dominated by Trump and Jordan. But a vote for the other declared candidate, Representative Steve Scalise (R-LA), means being on record against Trump and for a man who once described himself as Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke “without the baggage.”

The other calculation those wavering Republican members of Congress must make is what they expect for the future. A number of the state maps that gave Republicans their slim House majority have been found unconstitutional and are now being redrawn in ways that suggest the Democrats might well retake the House in 2024. If that happens, having forged a working relationship with the Democrats would be far more useful than standing with the hard right.

It would take as few as five Republican votes to elect Jeffries speaker, which is an unlikely outcome, but it would also take just a few Democrats to vote present and lower the number needed to enable the Republicans to elect someone more moderate than their current option. Jeffries might well be signaling that the Democrats are willing to enable that outcome, but only for a Republican who is not a bomb thrower.

Republicans who are not committed to Trump may also be paying attention to what increasingly feels like a shift in the country’s popular tide. Today’s news provided more evidence that Biden’s approach to the economy—using the government to invest in ordinary Americans—is working far better than the Republicans’ approach of slashing the government to enable capitalists to organize the economy ever did.

Today the Bureau of Labor Statistics released yet another very strong jobs report showing that the U.S. economy added 336,000 jobs in September, almost twice what economists had predicted. The unemployment rate held steady at 3.8%. The biggest gains were in leisure and hospitality and in government. Average hourly wages went up 4.2% over the past 12 months; more than the inflation rate of 3.4%. The bureau also revised its employment statistics for July and August upward, showing that the employment in those months was up 199,000 more than the gains already reported.

The country’s shift away from concentrating wealth upward also showed today in positive movement toward a historic settlement between the United Auto Workers and automakers. UAW president Shawn Fain announced that General Motors has agreed to include workers at plants making batteries for electric vehicles in the UAW’s national labor agreement.

While the UAW wanted—and appears to be obtaining—higher wages, its leaders were especially concerned about what the transition to EVs would do to workers. Fain said that automakers had been planning to phase out the engine and transmission plants worked by union laborers and replace those jobs with lower-wage jobs in non-union battery plants. Until now, automakers had said it would be “impossible” to permit the battery plants to be covered by the union umbrella.

Fain called the agreement a “transformative win” and, in light of that agreement, announced that the UAW will not expand its strike into GM’s most profitable plant in Arlington, Texas. Fain said he expects that Ford and Stellantis, which includes Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram, will agree to the same deal, and labor scholars agree.

Trump visited a non-union plant in this dispute, where he attacked the transition to EVs as job killers for autoworkers. This new agreement makes it unlikely that autoworkers will back Trump over this issue.

Biden, on the other hand, weighed in on the fight by joining the UAW picket line.

hcr
0 Replies
 
Bogulum
 
  4  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 07:10 am
Throughout this whole speaker debacle, I’ve heard the media offer a dozen suggestions, queries, musings, etc., about “Why don’t 7 or 8 democrats just go on and vote with republicans, as a sign of their goodwill?”

But I don’t hear anyone suggesting that 7 or 8 republicans vote for Jeffries as speaker- as a sign of good will, or anything else.

Why is that?
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 08:22 am
@Bogulum,
I think it because the Republicans don't want to elect a Democratic Speaker when they're the majority party in the House. It would be more than a show of goodwill – it would be an admission of the GOP's total irrelevance. McCarthy turned down the opportunity to maintain his position with the support of Democrats. Better to just lose his job than to be tarred and feathered by MAGAtards.
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 08:24 am
Amazon’s Alexa has been claiming the 2020 election was stolen
Region Philbis
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 08:32 am
@hightor,

from the article...
Quote:
Asked about fraud in the race — in which President Biden defeated former president Donald Trump with 306 electoral college votes — the popular voice assistant said it was “stolen by a massive amount of election fraud,” citing Rumble, a video streaming service favored by conservatives.

Amazon declined to explain why its voice assistant draws 2020 election answers from unvetted sources.

“These responses were errors that were delivered a small number of times, and quickly fixed when brought to our attention,” Amazon spokeswoman Lauren Raemhild said in a statement. “We continually audit and improve the systems we have in place for detecting and blocking inaccurate content.”
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 08:50 am
@Real Music,
Quote:
‘It’s not polling, it’s real’: Dems overperform in 24 of 30 special elections so far in 2023,

Five Thirty Eight compiled the 30 different special elections so far in 2023. In 24 out of these 30 races, Democrats over performed their baseline. “That says something robust and inspiring about where we stand at this moment,” says Chris Hayes.

Yes. That's the key data point which leads to my optimism regarding the next election (bolstered by the legal cases against Trump).

But my point was that even when/if Biden wins, there are powerful dynamics which will continue to push the US towards crazyland.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 08:55 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Did you get his name and number?

I did not. I don't know what product he uses to so thoroughly remove facial hair but I prefer some stubble on a face I'm kissing.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 09:22 am

Colbert's finally back... enjoy...

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 09:45 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Book-report in The Guardian: ‘An end of American democracy’: Heather Cox Richardson on Trump’s historic threat

Just bumped into this now in my morning reading. It's typically brilliant and clarifying. Attending to HCR regularly keeps me sane.

Serious hat tip to hightor for his regular inclusion of her work here.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 09:58 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Serious hat tip to hightor for his regular inclusion of her work here.
I totally agree Exclamation
0 Replies
 
Bogulum
 
  2  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 01:41 pm
@hightor,
Wow. From your answer it almost seems like you didn’t even notice that I was asking why the MEDIA was advocating for democrats, and not republicans to be conciliatory.
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  3  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2023 10:04 pm
Moderate GOP have opportunity to break MAGA grip on House with Speakership vote.

The Republican Party is not a MAGA monolith and extreme partisanship is not required by GOP bylaws. A small number of moderate House Republicans could potentially bypass the Matt Gaetz extremists and strike a deal with Democrats to support a speaker choice of their own with a coalition mandate and the rug pulled out from under Donald Trump and his acolytes in Congress. If they have the courage. Michelle Goldberg, columnist for the New York Times, discusses with Alex Wagner.


Published Oct 6, 2023


0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Oct, 2023 06:47 am
https://i.imgur.com/bY7Rr8W.jpeg
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Oct, 2023 06:53 am
https://i.imgur.com/5cLhNic.jpg
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Oct, 2023 08:23 am
https://assets.amuniversal.com/16c4a9f03ec0013c1adb005056a9545d.png
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Reply Sun 8 Oct, 2023 09:06 am
The Republican party is at last paying the price of its Faustian pact with Trump

The ousting by extremists of House speaker Kevin McCarthy is a sign of the GOP’s willingness to test the limits of US democracy

Quote:
More than 11 years ago, before Donald Trump emerged from the primordial ooze of the far-right fever swamp, before the aborted January 6 insurrection and before the latest spasm of Republican extremism felled House speaker Kevin McCarthy, two renowned political scientists, Thomas Mann, and Norman Ornstein, put their finger on the essence of increasingly dysfunctional US politics: the Republican party. Mann and Ornstein argued that the Grand Old Party (GOP) had become an “insurgent outlier” that was “ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition”.

Eleven years later, the enfant terrible of American politics has somehow got unimaginably worse. The GOP today is less a political party and more an inchoate mass of cultural grievances, conspiracy theories and lowest common denominator political slogans. Trump, for all his toxicity, is a symptom of the GOP’s decades-long descent into madness. Legislating is not seen as a tool for bettering the plight of the American people but rather an opportunity to troll Democrats and play to the perceived slights of the party’s rank-and-file supporters.

But Republican indifference to governing is, perhaps, the least of the party’s pathologies. In slavishly supporting Trump and his Maga – Make America Great Again – supporters, they have empowered a political movement that is increasingly testing the limits of the US democratic experiment.

McCarthy’s political trajectory tells the sorry tale. After January 6, McCarthy, who, along with his political colleagues, was forced to hide from the marauding insurrectionists, turned against the man responsible for the day’s violence. Privately, he told fellow Republicans: “I’ve had it with this guy”. But within weeks, he travelled to the ex-president’s palatial digs in South Florida and, on bended knee, pledged loyalty to the GOP’s orange god. He tried to block a bipartisan congressional committee to investigate January 6 and allied himself with conspiracy theorists who continued to spread lies about the 2020 election. Earlier this year, he gave in to Republican extremists and announced an impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden, even though there is no evidence that the president has committed any impeachable offences.

McCarthy, like countless Republican supplicants over the past eight years, realised that his political aspirations were directly tied to his willingness to support Trump and the extremist forces within the party that have rallied around him. In a tale as old as time, he made a deal with the devil, only to be burned by the political forces he’d empowered. Trump’s hold over the Republican party is so complete that it borders on the pathological. Since March, he has been indicted four times and charged with 91 separate felonies. Yet his poll numbers among Republicans have dramatically improved. He enjoys a more than 45-point lead in the race for the party’s presidential nomination.

There simply is no future in the GOP for an elected official who refuses to prostrate themselves to Trump. Liz Cheney was the most vocal and impassioned Republican in speaking out against him after January 6. Her reward: McCarthy engineered her removal from the GOP House leadership. Then, in 2022, a Maga Republican challenged Cheney in a GOP primary and defeated her by nearly 40 points. Another Republican apostate, former presidential candidate and current Utah senator Mitt Romney, who twice voted to convict Trump in his impeachment trials, recently announced that he wouldn’t run for re-election.

In a series of interviews with the Atlantic’s McKay Coppins, he recounted how, “in public”, his fellow Republican senators “played their parts as Trump loyalists, often contorting themselves rhetorically to defend the president’s most indefensible behaviour. But in private, they ridiculed his ignorance, rolled their eyes at his antics and made incisive observations about his warped, toddler-like psyche.”

Like other principled Republicans, Romney is choosing to walk away, and it’s hard to blame him. His criticisms of Trump have led to death threats and he is now spending an estimated $5,000 a day on private security. But the result is that the GOP’s ranks are now increasingly filled by those with bottomless reservoirs of ambition and empty cupboards of integrity. So for those hoping that a principled and mature Republican party will somehow emerge from this mess, think again. The political incentives in the GOP run in a singular direction – to the far right. If there is any silver lining, it is this: for all the Republican voters who love Trump, there is a larger mobilised group of voters who loathes him.

Indeed, what is perhaps most striking about Trump is the static nature of his political support. In fact, if one compares his approval ratings from February 2020 – before the Covid pandemic ravaged the nation – to those in November 2020, when he ran for re-election, they were largely unchanged. Since leaving office, his approval numbers have also largely stayed the same. Americans have, by and large, made up their minds about Trump – and the verdict is: “We don’t like him.”

The last three US elections prove the point. In what was largely seen as a rebuke to Trump, in the 2018 midterms, Democrats picked up more than 40 seats and control of the House of Representatives. In 2020, he lost re-election by at least 7m votes to Biden(4m more than he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton in 2016). In the 2022 midterms, the Democrats dramatically overperformed, picking up a seat in the Senate and barely losing the House of Representatives. So far this year, in dozens of special elections, Democrats are overperforming by a whopping 11 points. Part of this is a byproduct of the supreme court’s decision on abortion rights, but it’s also a backlash to the extremism that Trump has engendered.

Of course, elections are tricky things and there is no guarantee that the unpopular Biden will emerge victorious next November. But take his current lousy polling with a grain of salt. It’s one thing to want a different Democratic nominee, as many Democrats do, but elections are about choices. That the likely option for voters in November 2024 will be Biden, or a deeply unstable opponent who could be a multiple convicted felon, has a way of narrowing one’s focus. But even if Trump loses, the problem of the Republican party will still be with us long after he’s left the political scene.

guardian
0 Replies
 
Bogulum
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Oct, 2023 09:36 am
Hope y'all read and respond to my last little Medium piece.
-
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Oct, 2023 10:19 am
@Bogulum,

would need a Medium account in order to do so...

https://iili.io/J2QLLdb.jpg


 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 05:38:15