No they don't. It's not a "them" – it's an institution. US citizens can support some of what the FBI does and be critical of other things. It just takes a little emotional maturity.
Gadzooks. That level of purposeful stupidness quoted is positively elegant in its purity.
(Historical note: A British wag once observed, "Margaret Thatcher cannot see an institution without wanting to whack it with her purse").
To save myself some time this morning, I'll post this short remembrance to Pope Walters.
0 Replies
Lash
-2
Reply
Sat 31 Dec, 2022 09:51 am
@hightor,
Yes, now that the FBI, CIA, DHS, and all the other destructive unaccountable spy agencies have joined the DNC in the most universally reviled surveillance and censorship psyop against the American public, the DNC and their cheering fans worship them.
Gadzooks is actually a contraction of the original ‘God’s hooks’, referring to the nails used to crucify Jesus.
I hereby encourage more usage of 17th and 18th century exclamations. Egad! The merriment!
Cor blimey!!
Okay, that one's apparently late 19th century, but it's one of my favorites.
0 Replies
Frank Apisa
2
Reply
Sat 31 Dec, 2022 10:54 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:
Yes, now that the FBI, CIA, DHS, and all the other destructive unaccountable spy agencies have joined the DNC in the most universally reviled surveillance and censorship psyop against the American public, the DNC and their cheering fans worship them.
Lately, you seem to be reveling in your dissatisfaction with life, Lash. Good for you; that is not always easy to do.
Have as happy a New Year as what you are dealing with allows.
0 Replies
Real Music
2
Reply
Sat 31 Dec, 2022 11:03 am
@Lash,
Former FBI special agent on the foiled plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
Former FBI special agent Frank Montoya Jr. joins CBSN AM to share insight into the FBI's efforts to thwart a violent plot to overthrow Michigan's government and kidnap, even potentially kill,
Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
Published Oct 9, 2020
0 Replies
revelette1
2
Reply
Sat 31 Dec, 2022 11:03 am
Quote:
WASHINGTON — The House sergeant at arms, who was the head of the D.C. National Guard during the attack on the Capitol, told the Jan. 6 committee that the law enforcement response would have looked much different had the rioters been Black Americans.
“I’m African American. Child of the sixties. I think it would have been a vastly different response if those were African Americans trying to breach the Capitol,” William J. Walker told congressional investigators, in an interview transcript released Tuesday. “As a career law enforcement officer, part-time soldier, last five years full but, but a law enforcement officer my entire career, the law enforcement response would have been different.”
His testimony echoed the observations of many Americans, including President Joe Biden, who noted the stark difference in the law enforcement response to protests in Washington following the May 2020 murder of George Floyd and the lax security at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
William J. Walker, the head of the D.C. National Guard during the insurrection, also indicated he thought more people in the crowd would have died if the mob had been largely Black instead of overwhelmingly white.
“You know, as a law enforcement officer, there were — I saw enough to where I would have probably been using deadly force,” he said. “I think it would have been more bloodshed if the composition would have been different.”
Walker, a former Drug Enforcement Administration official who became the House sergeant at arms in April 2021, also described his personal experiences with discriminatory law enforcement stops, and discussed having “the talk” with his five children and his granddaughter about surviving police encounters as a Black American.
“You’re looking at somebody who would get stopped by the police for driving a high-value government vehicle. No other reason,” Walker said.
The D.C. National Guard was not authorized to assist at the Capitol on Jan. 6 until after a delay of 3 hours and 19 minutes that the House committee's report pins on a "likely miscommunication between members of the civilian leadership in the Department of Defense."
Walker told investigators that it was clear to him beforehand that Jan. 6 was going to be a "big deal" just from being aware of what was happening in the world.
"I'm an intelligence officer ... to me, the intelligence was there that this was going to be a big deal," he said, citing the civil unrest in November and December when Trump supporters came to Washington.
"You don't need intelligence. I mean, everybody knew that people were directed to come there by the president. November was a run-up, December was practice, and January 6th was executed," Walker said.
"I personally, William Joseph Walker, not General Walker, thought that it was just vastly different," he said, comparing the unrest of summer 2020 to the unrest after the election. "National Guard is not called in December. National Guard is not called in November. And I watched on television the difference between people coming to the Capitol in November. And if you watch the film, and if these same groups came back in December, better prepare. Better prepare."
As NBC News first reported last month, the Jan. 6 committee made a decision to focus its final report on former President Donald Trump, and not as much on the law enforcement and intelligence failures and other issues that committee staffers investigated. Part of the panel's investigation into intelligence failures was ultimately relegated to an appendix, though the report did note that “Federal and local law enforcement authorities were in possession of multiple streams of intelligence predicting violence directed at the Capitol prior to January 6th."
A spokesman for Jan. 6 panel member Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., told The Washington Post last month that committee staffers had “submitted subpar material for the report that reflects long-held liberal biases about federal law enforcement” and that she would not “sign onto any ‘narrative’ that suggests Republicans are inherently racist or smears men and women in law enforcement.”
Still, the testimony of Walker — a highly decorated commanding general and a long-serving DEA special agent who rose to top leadership positions at the agency before becoming the first Black House sergeant at arms — underscores some of the systemic issues that went unaddressed in the committee's final report.
the most universally reviled surveillance and censorship psyop against the American public
What is this bit referencing?
Almost hate to tell you if you’ve successfully avoided it this far. The cat is out of the bag on exactly how our government censors and surveils citizens via social media.
When Musk bought Twitter, he found email evidence and asked a few journalists to make it public.
Gadzooks is actually a contraction of the original ‘God’s hooks’, referring to the nails used to crucify Jesus.
I did not know that! But it clarifies that I was wrong - it wasn't too much typing that had my hands bleeding this morning.
I once forgave our goalkeeper for conceding an easy goal on the basis that he must have suffered from stigmata.
0 Replies
hightor
5
Reply
Sat 31 Dec, 2022 12:41 pm
Quote:
The cat is out of the bag on exactly how our government censors and surveils citizens via social media.
That's not exactly news. There are actual laws governing hate speech, threats of violence, violations of privacy, etc. It's not censorship – it's editing to conform to terms of use.
Quote:
When Musk bought Twitter, he found email evidence and asked a few journalists to make it public.
And the reaction was basically a collective yawn, not a universal outcry. It isn't a "smoking gun" since everyone already knew it was going on.
The cat is out of the bag on exactly how our government censors and surveils citizens via social media.
That's not exactly news. There are actual laws governing hate speech, threats of violence, violations of privacy, etc. It's not censorship – it's editing to conform to terms of use.
Quote:
When Musk bought Twitter, he found email evidence and asked a few journalists to make it public.
And the reaction was basically a collective yawn, not a universal outcry. It isn't a "smoking gun" since everyone already knew it was going on.
The ‘collective yawn’ is the DNC/FBI/CIA etc latest iteration of gaslighting. They think if they force most of the media outlets they control not to report it or minimize it, nothing will happen.
One thing that’s already happened is democrat fans sank far below republican fans.