13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Fri 15 Apr, 2022 04:06 am
Quote:
A study released yesterday by ProPublica of leaked tax documents from the Internal Revenue Service revealed how our current laws permit the very wealthy to sidestep taxes and amass greater and greater wealth. According to Forbes, the wealth of the richest 25 Americans rose more than $400 billion from 2014 to 2018, giving them a combined wealth of $1.1 trillion. It would take the wealth of 14.3 million ordinary American wage earners to get to that number. During those years, those 25 richest Americans paid $13.6 billion in taxes, a true tax rate of 3.4%.

Those with virtually unlimited money can buy the tools to spread propaganda in favor of their position. That concern is behind the fight over “free speech” that right-wing leaders have launched against social media platforms that have excluded their lies and calls for violence.

It is also behind the outcry today over the proposal of billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, allegedly the richest man in the world, to buy Twitter for a cash offer of $43 billion in a hostile takeover of the popular platform. (According to ProPublica, Musk paid no income tax in 2018.) Musk says he wants to own the platform himself to make it more “broadly inclusive,” because he believes that inclusion is “extremely important to the future of civilization…. I don’t care about the economics at all.”

Musk’s call for “free speech” is perceived to be a sign that he would reopen the platform to former president Donald Trump and others currently banned from it because of their lies about the January 6 insurrection. Right-wing politicians lauded the potential purchase, while journalists, who use the platform intensively to keep track of breaking stories, mulled whether they could stay if it becomes a haven for the right wing.

source
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2022 04:24 am
Quote:
(...)

The old Democratic argument for state’s rights has reemerged in the present-day Republican Party, and it has taken on many of the same contours as it had in the 1850s. Adherents are operating in a false reality, believing that their vision of the nation is the only correct one, and that they must impose their will on the rest of us, no matter what we want. As Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) tweeted on October 8, 2020, “Democracy isn’t the objective; liberty, peace, and prosperity are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.”

That fear of democracy has brought us to the edge of losing our government. In an exclusive story today by Ryan Nobles, Annie Grayer, Zachary Cohen, and Jamie Gangel, CNN published 100 text messages between Senator Lee, Representative Chip Roy of Texas, and Trump’s White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. The messages were obtained by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol.

They show elected members of our government eager to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 election in which a national majority of 7 million people had chosen Democrat Joe Biden as president. On November 7, acting on the false narrative the Trump administration had established months before that the election would be marked by fraud, Lee was one of a number of right-wing lawmakers and leaders who offered to Trump their "unequivocal support for you to exhaust every legal and constitutional remedy at your disposal to restore Americans faith in our elections." On November 9, Lee told Meadows he was working to bring senators around to the idea of challenging the election. Roy wrote that they needed evidence of fraud: “We need ammo. We need fraud examples. We need it this weekend.”

Gradually, though, Lee and Roy became concerned that the administration was long on accusations and short on evidence. On November 19, Trump’s public legal team—Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, and Jenna Ellis—gave a press conference that was full of wild accusations, all of which were false, that might well have been designed simply to whip up Trump’s base for later attacks on the counting of electoral votes. (Trump’s team lost more than 60 lawsuits over the election, and when Dominion Voting Systems sued Powell for $1.3 billion over her accusations that their software flipped votes, her legal team argued that “reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact.”)

In the wake of the conference, Lee worried that “the potential defamation liability for the president is significant here. For the campaign and the president personally. Unless Powell can back up everything she said, which I kind of doubt she can.” He believed the press conference was damaging enough that the president “should probably disassociate himself and refute any claims that can't be substantiated.” On November 22, he begged Meadows: “Please tell me what I should be saying.” Roy wrote: “If we don’t get logic and reason in this before 11/30—the GOP conference will bolt (all except the most hard core Trump guys).”

Lee and Roy then turned to lawyer John Eastman’s plan to have states appoint “alternative slates of electors” in place of the legitimate, certified ones. By January 3, Lee specified that those new slates must be named “pursuant to state law,” and started calling state legislators.

In the end, Lee and Roy came to see that the fight to keep Trump in power was unconstitutional. On December 31, Roy wrote: “The President should call everyone off. It's the only path. If we substitute the will of states through electors with a vote by Congress every 4 years...we have destroyed the electoral college... Respectfully.” On January 1, he added: “If POTUS allows this to occur...we’re driving a stake in the heart of the federal republic….”

On January 4, Roy had abandoned the attack on the federal government, but other Republicans persisted. Roy texted: “I am truly sorry I am in a different spot then you and our brothers re: Wednesday. But I will defend all.” On January 6, during the riot, he texted: “This is a sh*tshow…. Fix this now.”

“We are,” Meadows texted. Later that night, 8 senators and 139 representatives nonetheless voted to challenge certified state electoral votes electing Biden.

Since January 6, the Republican Party has shifted its focus to the states to undermine the federal government. Nineteen states have changed their election laws to enable Republicans to win their states regardless of the will of the voters, sending Republican electors to put a Republican president in place. Encouraged by the Supreme Court’s “originalist” majority, which denies the ability of the federal government to protect civil rights in the states, Florida, Mississippi, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and Texas have all overridden the constitutional right to abortion, and Republican lawmakers have indicated they are gunning for birth control and interracial marriage as well. Dramatically, in the last week. Texas governor Greg Abbott has effectively shut down international trade across the U.S.-Mexico border, explicitly asserting state power over national power and thus driving prices up all across the country.

(...)

source
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2022 06:24 am
Quote:
Here’s how much President Biden paid in taxes

On Friday, three days ahead of tax day for most Americans, President Joe Biden and
Vice President Kamala Harris released the completed tax returns from their first year
in office.

In a notable contrast to former President Donald Trump, Biden has now made 24 years
of his tax returns public. Harris has released 18 years of her returns.

Biden, 79, filed jointly with his wife Jill, reporting an adjusted gross income of $610,702.
The majority of their money came from their salaries. Jill Biden, a community college
professor, earned $67,116 from her work at Northern Virginia Community College in 2021.
The first couple also received income from IRA distributions, Social Security benefits,
interest, and royalties.

Harris and the Second Gentleman, Douglas Emhoff, released a joint return showing an
adjusted gross income in 2021 of $1,655,563.

They paid $523,371 in federal income taxes and $120,517 to California, $2,044 to New
York, and $54,441 in District of Columbia income tax. They reported $22,100 in charitable
donations.
(yahoo)
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2022 07:00 am
@hightor,
Florida targets school math textbooks over critical race theory objections

Quote:
The Florida Department of Education on Friday said the state will not include dozens of math textbooks in a list used by school districts to buy books for classrooms because their content included references to critical race theory and other “prohibited topics” and “unsolicited strategies.”

The announcement was made in a press release titled “Florida Rejects Publishers’ Attempts to Indoctrinate Students.” It did not include the names of any of the books or provide specific examples of the content that prompted their objections.

The state agency said that 54 of the 132 textbooks that publishers submitted for the state’s review were “impermissible with either Florida’s new standards or contained prohibited topics — the most in Florida’s history.” Most of the books that were not approved were for grades K-5, the statement said.

“Reasons for rejecting textbooks included references to Critical Race Theory (CRT), inclusions of Common Core, and the unsolicited addition of Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in mathematics,” the press release said.

The decision comes as efforts to challenge books surge in local school board meetings across the nation. In Florida, Republican lawmakers approved a new law that offers more transparency in the book selection process, casting the issue as one about parental rights.

The pushback was almost immediate. Some Democrats criticized the decision, arguing that it was part of a continued attempt to politicize education in Florida.

“#DeSantis has turned our classroom into political battlefields and this is just the beginning,” state Rep. Carlos Guillermo Smith, D-Orlando, posted on Twitter.

Florida Education Commissioner Richard Corcoran has made no secret of his plan to address social issues through textbook adoption. In a May 2021 speech at conservative Hillsdale College, Corcoran spoke of the need to get “crazy liberal stuff” out of the state’s instructional materials.

“When it comes to education, other states continue to follow Florida’s lead as we continue to reinforce parents’ rights by focusing on providing their children with a world-class education without the fear of indoctrination or exposure to dangerous and divisive concepts in our classrooms,” Corcoran said in a statement on Friday.

The state has a textbook adoption cycle that rotates through subjects every six years. When buying books for their schools, districts turn to the state’s approved list to make sure they align with state standards.

Next up is social studies, and many educators have predicted the effort will be more confrontational than in past years — particularly after the approval of a new law that will require schools to open to the public committee meetings where books are reviewed for purchase, and to make all materials available for public review before it is approved.

The measure, signed by DeSantis last month, will also require schools to post all the selection criteria they use in choosing books.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2022 08:38 am

You Call It “Inflation,” I Call It a “Dying Planet” [— more accurately, a dying civilization]

Why the Price of Everything Is Going Crazy — And There May Be No Going Back

Quote:
The other day, my little local coffee shop was the site of a heist. Think Ocean’s 2022. Only the victim? Me. Do you remember the scene where the little Chinese guy hang upside down from the ceiling and performs Shaolin acrobatics to filch the stuff straight out of the vault? $6 for a coffee. $8 for a goddamned croissant! $15 for a sandwich. What is this stuff made of, plutonium? Hey, little Chinese guy — get the hell out of my wallet!!

We bought a light lunch for 2. And left $50 poorer. It wasn’t exactly steak frites, with a caviar appetizer, followed by a sinfully indulgent gold-dusted chocolate explosion cake. It was just coffee and sandwiches. Wait, no, actually, it was a heist. I felt the way Bernie Madoff’s “investors” must have.

Good Lord. Have you been out there these days? It’s terrifying. The prices, I mean. It’s like the world’s richest man — a psychotic Jeff Bezos — is on a golden scooter, with a gigantic red marker, and marking up everything willy nilly to the point of insanity, stopping for a split second, laughing maniacally, and then revving off to mark up something else.

It is crazy. Looking at my bank account hurts, because this is the worst. Big expenses you can kind of handle, psychologically, you get an idea of the magnitude — but this? Five bucks here, ten there, everything explosively surging upwards? It’s being nickel and dimed to death by a thousand cuts. Even a self-absorbed bastard like me has done something peculiar. Cut back. I’m like hey Umair, maybe you don’t need fourteen cups of coffee you barely drink…when they’re like $87 dollars a day. Maybe, I don’t know, don’t just throw all that money away.

What is even going on here? How did stuff get this eye-wateringly expensive? And is it going to end?

This is the reality of an age of inflation. It’s weirdly nightmarish. You can’t do anything about it. You have two choices: cut back, or suck it up, and pay. And the price rises are totally, completely out of control. I used the example of my little coffee shop — but in truth, it’s everything. Grocery shopping? It’s insane! It’s like offering a crook an open invitation to pick your pocket. We’re not even feeding a family, and I don’t think we leave our daily shop spending less than $50. All we buy is enough for the day. Snowy’s treats now cost $20 a bag. I know my dog is basically the Dauphin, and has the taste of Louis Quatorze but come on dude. It’s aggressively painful watching your dog eat twenty dollar bills for breakfast, and then grin up at you like a little happy gremlin.

I could go on and on. The stuff for my music? Hahaha. Don’t make me laugh. Music gear has exploded in price — gone up by hundreds of percent. Good luck haggling over a car, though maybe that’s a relief. Clothes. Electronics. Energy. The list is endless. The days of falling prices seem to be over. Everything is on its way up faster than if you pee on Donald Trump, he gets a — never mind.

I’m sure you’ve felt the pain — and the sense of crazy, too. A $15 dollar sandwich? Are you kidding me? What’s it served in, the holy grail?

It’s often said by pundits that all this is the fault of one man, and I don’t just mean maniac baboon Jeff Bezos on a scooter with a giant black marker, but everyone else’s other least favourite person. Vladimir Putin. There’s some truth in that, but not enough. Yes, Putin’s war has had a ruinous effect on energy prices globally, and it’s about to hit commodity and food prices, too. But the truth is that this age of inflation started well before Putin’s war — and it’s about more than that, too.

It’s been a few years, and if you’ve been paying attention to things like commodities prices — and why would you if you’re a normal person, because, well, you’ve got a life to live — they’ve generally been rising. They’ve been rising because harvests have been failing. Everything from coffee to sugar harvests to wheat crops have been failing over the last few years.

And that is because we live on a dying planet. This is an effect of climate change. Everybody in power is pretending to ignore this, by the way, in the way that these things go. Imagine a conversation between two investment bankers, or a Prime Minister and his Economic Advisors. “Hey, Steve, do you know why the harvests of everything are beginning to fail? Hmm, it almost seems like there’s a pattern here!” “Why, sir. It’s just a coincidence! A run of bad luck, if you will! Statistics prove that if you spin a roulette wheel a million times, well, you’ll lose ten times in a row sometimes!! It’s pure chance!!” “What a relief! You mean it has nothing to do with, say, us turning the planet into an inhabitable garbage fire made of microplastics and radioactive billionaire dust?” “Nothing to do with that at all!!”

This is how idiotic our leaders actually are. It doesn’t take a genius to understand the following relationship. As the temperature rises, harvests will begin to fail. That is because formerly temperate zones begin to turn tropical or even desertify. Their water tables fail, the soil turns arid, and the ecosystems supporting crops and grains and so forth begin to wither. That is exactly what is happening to us on the highest economic level. We’re at about 1 degree and something of climate change — that’s all — but we’re already a planet where harvests are beginning to fail.

And as harvests fail, obviously, prices began to explode. For food. For everything that depends on food, like labour. For all the byproducts of our food systems, like biodiesel and so forth. For commodities in general, because mining too, gets a lot harder as temperatures rise. The famous “chip shortage,” too, was largely an effect of climate change. It’s due to a fire at one factory, a drought in another, and a storm at another — and it’s caused the world’s electronics to suffer a long term undersupply.

So let me say it plainly, since our leaders are terrified of telling you this, and maybe rightly so, because your next question is going to be, after gnashing your teeth in horror, so this isn’t going to end? This phase of inflation is about a dying planet.

Before I answer the question, “Will this end?” let me come back to energy for a moment. Food prices rising — commodities prices in general — were a direct effect of climate change. So what about Putin’s war? Well, just think about what it’s really about. Controlling resources. Putin knows that if he controls the resources — oil, gas, metal, wheat, and so forth — he can control a dying planet. He who controls the resources controls a dying planet, because we all need them that much more. You can see this very, very clearly in the way that Putin’s skewered Europe right on the horns on an insoluble dilemma: allow war in Ukraine, or depend on Russian resources?

Putin’s war in Ukraine is driven by ideological reasons, true — the weird blend of religion and fanaticism I’ve called New Age Fascism. But more than that, it’s the first of the great resource wars on a dying planet. Ukraine is a strategically vital nation, at least on a dying planet — it’s Europe’s breadbasket, provides the world all kinds of basic resources from wheat to metals. Ukraine is one of the very first nations you’d want to conquer if you wanted to control what few resources were going to be left on a dying planet, and this is the deeper logic of Putin’s game.

Resource wars are not going to end. In fact, they are only now just getting started — just after commodities prices have been soaring for the last few years thanks to failed harvests. See how predictable that is? It’s not that the two are even consciously linked — some dictator sees commodities prices rising and thinks “it’s time for war!” — it’s just that this is what inevitably happens. Putin’s wars are obviously not going to end. China, soon enough, will have to secure its own empire of resources, as the planet goes on dying. The West appears to have no strategy for any of this, because it’s only answer is “globalization,” which has failed the way that my first marriage did — she threw plates at me, dear reader, because I was a bastard.

We are therefore now entering an age of a) resource wars b) shortages and c) inflation. Serious, sustained, vicious inflation. These three things have already the defined the 2020s. What did Covid do? Cause shortages around the globe — in a foreshadowing of the future on a dying planet. Covid highlighted just how illusionary all this abundance of stuff really is — ships stop for a few days, borders shut down for a day or two, and bang — you can’t get stuff to eat or drink the way you’re used to. But what happens on a planet of mega fires and mega floods and mega weather? Mega risk does. Shortages becomes endemic, a way of life. As they slowly are now.

The flipside of shortages is, of course, inflation. And inflation is the savage, gruesome reality of living on a dying planet. There isn’t enough left to go around. There never was. 20% of humanity — otherwise known as “The West” — consumes 90% of the planet’s resources. That leaves just 10% of them for 80% of humanity. The rest of the world has always lived without. It’s just we in the West who are starting to discover what the real economics of existence are.

The truth is that we’ve underpaid for the global resources we monopolize. We’ve “externalized” the costs of climate change, of failing harvests, of ecological collapse, of basically slave labour, and now, by propping up murderous dictators, it turns out, of war, too. The stuff we came to happily take for granted, piled high on the shelves, was artificially cheap. That meant our lifestyles were artificially grandiose — our living standards artificially raised.

That was dumb, guys. It was dumb building a global economy like this. Where someone — you and me — go to the store, pick up, I don’t know, a bag of sugar, and don’t see the slave labour, hydrocarbons, war it’s really made of. Maybe the average person will never see that — but we built a global economy where they were allowed to be ignorant and blind. Our leaders should have priced all those externalities in — through fair trade deals and so forth — because now, we’re going to pay for them the hard way.

It’s going to be a long, bitter, painful era of inflation. We’re going to be very, very lucky if it just lasts a decade. Central banks raising rates are only going to make it worse — because guess what, you can’t resurrect a dead harvest with an interest rate. I know financial types think Money is God, but, no, only Jesus can do that.

What we have here is a series of supply shocks — the greatest in history, probably. Everything is starting to run out. Guess how many coffee and sugar harvests there are going to be when the temperature rises by four degrees? None. Guess how many new mines there are going to be? Now guess how many wars there are going to be. How high prices will continue to go.

In the face of this series of catastrophic supply shocks, our old ways don’t work. Central banks are going to raise rates, and that’s only going to make the problem worse. Because now you’re paying more in interest — but that’s not helping resurrect a dying planet. It’s just making you poorer, and making the rich richer. Go, capitalism, go! Kill me, please! The only way out of this is to reconstitute the entire material basis of our global economy. That means no more hydrocarbons. It means far, far less capital intensity. It means a way to supply people with everything from cars to fuel to energy to sugar to coffee that doesn’t a) kill the planet b) prop up psychotic billiionaires and dictators and c) end up causing war.

We have no idea — none — how to do any of that. If we were smart, we’d launch a Manhattan Project for it all — a series of them, in fact. To reinvent the material basis of our economy. Understanding that right about now, three degree or so of warming are — pardon the pun, go ahead and laugh like I just drove you into a psychotic state…baked in — so…well…how are we going to live? Where’s the harvest going to come from? How do we power civilization without hydrocarbons? What do we eat? How do we even drink water, without being forced to kill each other for it?

We need to reimagine our entire civilization, our entire global economy, the social contracts and socioeconomic compacts which distribute resources to people, detoxify those resource of everything from carbon to slave labour to war.

Not because I’m the reincarnation of John Lennon and Jimi Hendrix in the form of a brown dude. I’m not, though it’d be nice. Because we have to, or else…

Or else what?

Do you like the 2020s so far? What are you, an idiot? There are only three kinds of people who like the 2020s so far. One, Jeff Bezos on a scooter. Two, Baby Hitler or Vladimir Putin, but I repeat myself. And three, Satan, because let’s face it, this he’s rubbing his hands with glee and shouting “See! I told you! They are idiots!” to his minions, who are massaging his feet with baby’s tears.

Do you like the 2020s so far? I didn’t think so. That’s what the future looks like, into forever…unless we change it.

medium

bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2022 09:25 am

The Jan. 6 Committee Has the Goods on Trump To Make a Criminal Referral–So Why Is It Hesitating?[/b

https://secondnexus.com/january-6-committee-criminal-referral

Jay Kuo
21h
The Jan. 6 Committee Has the Goods on Trump To Make a Criminal Referral–So Why Is It Hesitating?
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), the vice-chair of the House Select Committee on January 6, expressed confidence that the former president and his associates committed crimes in connection with January 6. “It’s absolutely clear that what President Trump was doing, what a number of people around him were doing, that they knew it was unlawful. They did it anyway,” Cheney told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union.” Based on this, she confirmed that the Committee does indeed have enough evidence to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department.

And yet. The New York Times also reported that the Committee at this point is uncertain—in its words, “split”—on whether they should go ahead with the referral. The idea that no criminal referral might be forthcoming set off howls among some critics of the former president. But a few complex considerations are likely guiding this curious hesitation, so let’s delve a bit deeper.

The Committee May Not Want to Politicize Its Findings

While the Committee’s primary task has been investigatory, it certainly has the power at the conclusion of its hearings, findings, and report to include a criminal referral of any number of people, including the former president, to the Justice Department. But that move could in theory undermine any case brought by the Department by giving opponents an easy way to label it a partisan prosecution.

While the Committee is technically bipartisan, within the House GOP its work only has the support of the two Republicans who already serve on it, Rep. Cheney and Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), who are both staunch critics of the former president. Further, the move to criminally refer Trump may bear symbolic significance, but it carries no actual weight. The Justice Department is going to make up its own mind anyway based on the facts and evidence. So skeptics of the criminal referral wonder if it may wind up doing more harm than good.

Nonsense, say its proponents. The job of the Committee is to arrive at the truth, and if the truth is that the former president and his associates committed crimes, then the Committee has an obligation to make the referral, without regard to the political effect it might have. Besides, they argue, no matter what the Committee does, if the Justice Department brings charges it will be labeled by Trump and his allies as a partisan attack. Worse, if no criminal referral is made, the GOP may cite that as evidence that their case is weak.

There are merits to both sides of this argument, which makes the Committee’s decision both more difficult and more consequential.

A Federal Judge Has Already Found that Crimes Likely Were Committed

Weighing against referral, say some Committee members, is the fact that a federal judge already has ruled against Trump on the matter. That opinion will carry far more sway with the Justice Department than any referral from the Committee could, some argue, making such any referral just so much extra political baggage on an otherwise solid and tidy case.

Judge David Carter of the Central District of California ruled in a civil matter, based on the evidence presented by the January 6 Committee, that Trump and his erstwhile attorney John Eastman—the author of the infamous coup memo—likely committed two federal felonies in their attempt to overturn the results of the November 2020 election. While that ruling was made in connection to a dispute over whether claims of attorney-client privilege could be overcome under the “crime-fraud” exception to the privilege, it gave the Committee a unique opportunity to lay out its case, as best as it presently could, to show a neutral third party judge that there was fire behind the smoke after all.

The ruling of a federal judge is far more likely to be taken seriously by the public than a criminal referral by the Committee. Imagine, for example, Attorney General Garland giving a press conference and citing not the findings of the January 6 Committee but the ruling of a federal judge as grounds to launch a criminal case against the former president. The media take on such a pronouncement likely would be decidedly different.

Further, as I wrote about earlier, it appears that the Justice Department already is investigating members of Trump’s inner circle with respect to how the rally before the insurrection was funded and organized, and importantly how much they knew about plans to attempt to use violence. As the Justice Department makes its way up the ladder, albeit very slowly and methodically, it may not make sense to throw a bomb into that process by way of a criminal referral. Rep. Cheney directly referenced the continuing work of the Department in this regard, citing a recent plea agreement by Charles Donohoe of the Proud Boys, who admitted to conspiring to help organize a Trump supporter attack on Congress with the intention of stopping the electoral count proceedings. Rep. Cheney remarked that the evidence showed event organizers and planners “knew that they were going to attempt to use violence to stop the transfer of power.” If true, there would exist a direct connection between the Trump White House and the weaponization of the mob through knowing incitement of those assembled, followed by corrupt inaction to put a stop to them.

Moreover, the Justice Department has already signaled that it does not jump on command with respect to criminal referrals from Congress. To date, it has only moved forward with one referred case by charging former Trump aide Steve Bannon with criminal contempt of Congress. With respect to others who have been referred, including former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and now former aides Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino, the Department has remained silent. Indeed, it has been well over two months since it received the referral on Meadows. The Department’s reasons for slow walking or ignoring the contempt referrals remain a mystery, but they could have to do with a strong desire not to be seen as beholden to Democrats in Congress.

Ultimately, the Committee will act based on how its chair, vice-chair and the majority of its members, who have the closest eye on the facts and the investigation, wish to proceed. Rep. Cheney pushed back on the idea that the Committee was at all “split” over the issue. “There’s not really a dispute on the Committee,” she said. “The Committee is working in a really collaborative way to discuss these issues, as we are with all of the issues we’re addressing, and we’ll continue to work together to do so.”
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2022 04:06 am
Ukraine war unleashing a 'perfect storm' of crises, warns UN chief
bulmabriefs144
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2022 03:13 am
@hightor,
What are you doing listening to the UN, hightor?

Lemme give you a heads-up. Their record of "peacekeeping" ( you know, what thet were supposedly established for?) has been less than stellar. Rwanda? As soon as things got dangerous, they left everyone holding the bag.
https://www.trtworld.com/americas/twelve-times-the-un-has-failed-the-world-21666
Quote:
The United Nations (UN) was set up in 1945 as an international umbrella organisation with several objectives primarily including the prevention of war and maintaining peace in disputed areas.

However, the UN has failed several times across the world mostly because of the right to veto at the disposal of five countries.


Quote:
Israeli occupation (1948-Now)

Ever since the creation of the Jewish state in 1948, Palestinians have been fighting against what a UN investigator once described as Israel’s ethnic cleansing.

At least 15,000 Palestinians were killed and some 750,000 out of a total population of 1.9 million were forced to take refuge far from their homelands between 1947 and 1949. More than 7,000 Palestinians and 1,100 Israelis have died in the conflict between 2000 and 2014.


I'm actually in favor of a Jewish Israel, but they haven't been stellar at actually enforcing Jewish right to holy sites (their own Temple Mount), so I holding them guilty of trying to destabilize the country. Fail.

Quote:
Kashmir dispute (1948-Now)

The ongoing confrontation in the disputed Kashmir region has become one of the greatest human rights crises in history, marked by wanton killings, rape, incarceration of leaders and activists, torture and disappearances of Kashmiris, despite several unimplemented UN resolutions over the issue.

The mountainous region is divided between India and Pakistan, who have both claimed it in full since gaining independence from British colonists in 1947.

The rebellion by several Muslims groups in India-administered Kashmir, who seek either a merger with Pakistan or independence, has gained momentum after 1989. At least 68,000 people have been killed by Indian security forces since then.


Look, once again, Muslims are involved. The UN utterly refuses to enforce any idea of boundaries on the Muslim people, so there are these constant border skirmishes instead of saying "You live here, they live there. No, your 'holy area' isn't historically relevant." In fact, as you may see, they actively use them as a sort of battering ram to destabilize existing countries. The end goal? It seems to be to create a disorganized group of city-states under the thumb of world government. EU is their model.

Quote:
Cambodia violence (1975-1979)

After the end of the US-Vietnam War and the Cambodian civil war in 1975, the Khmer Rouge regime took control of Cambodia turning it into a socialist country, by using the policy of ultra-Maoism.

The regime carried out genocide between 1975-1979, killing some two million people, nearly 25 percent of the country.

The Vietnamese intervention ended genocide by the Khmer Rouge regime. The United Nations recognised the Khmer Rouge regime, while ignoring concerns of human rights violations.


Oh right, did we mention they're also socialist? The US should have deplatformed them by shuttering all UN centers in the US. Instead, we've allowed their policy basically screw with our own.

Oh btw, the UN has a lovely ivory sculpture, a "gift" from the ivory trade.
http://www.peacefuldumpling.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/ivory-carving.jpg
I saw this when I cisited the UN in New York. It took about 15 or 20 years for me to get how evil the UN is though.

Quote:
Somali civil war (1991-Now)

Since the ouster of dictator Mohamed Siad Barre by the Somali Rebellion in 1991, the decades-long civil war has raged between rival clans in the country.

The UN peacekeeping mission, UNOSOM, which was set up in December 1992 to facilitate humanitarian aid to people trapped by civil war and famine, has since failed because of the lack of government to communicate with and repeated attacks against UN officers.

The failure of the UN peacekeeping mission caused about 500,000 civilian deaths in the country.


Quote:
Rohingya Crisis, Myanmar (2017-Now)

On August 25, 2017, Myanmar launched a major military crackdown on the Muslim ethnic minority, killing almost 24,000 civilians and forcing 750,000 others, including women and children, to flee to Bangladesh, according to the Ontario International Development Agency (OIDA).

China stood behind Myanmar on the Rohingya crisis by blocking efforts for the Rohingya in the UN Security Council.

The UN documented mass gang rapes, killings — including of infants and young children — brutal beatings and disappearances committed by Myanmar state forces. The UN has described the Rohingya as the “world's most persecuted people.”


I remember this one. The Buddhists in Myanmar were mad enough to fight. The Muslims (again!) invaded their land, and killed many of the men while raping their women. The UN blames the victim, and calls the perpetrators "world's most persecuted people." I'm not sure thw writer of the article gets the problem here. But it is clear that the UN basically allowed the situation to get out of control.

Quote:
Yemen civil war (2014-Now)

The war in Yemen, which began in 2014, between forces loyal to the internationally-accepted government of President Abd Rabbu Mansour Hadi backed by Saudi Arabia and Iranian-backed Houthis has turned more violent after a Saudi-led international coalition started operations against Houthis in March 2015.

The Saudi-led coalition began its intervention in Yemen in 2015, escalating the war, which left the poorest country in the Arab world in a state of disaster.

The UN has failed to send humanitarian aid, food and drugs to civilians amid a blockade imposed on the war-torn country.


Quote:
Rwandan civil war (1994):

One of the worst ethnic genocides since World War II, the civil war between the Rwandan Armed Forces and the rebel Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) began in 1990 and lasted until 1994.

In 1994, the then Hutu-dominated regime killed 10 UN peacekeeping officers to prevent international intervention .

https://cdni0.trtworld.com/w960/q75/45407_RWAarchivegenocidevictimsreuterrs_1543429672274.jpg

In only three months, Hutus brutally murdered about 800,000 Tutsis and raped nearly 250,000 women in Rwanda while UN troops abandoned the victims or just stayed there as spectators while the horrific and brutal violence raged on.


It goes on for awhile more but you get the idea.

https://cdni0.trtworld.com/w960/q75/41934_AP_03110705832_1542206777978.jpg
Quote:
This image shows naked detainees with bags placed over their heads placed into a human pyramid as Spc. Sabrina Harman, middle and Cpl. Charles Graner Jr., above, pose behind them in late 2003 at the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad, Iraq. (AP)


Wanna stop Ukraine violence? Publicly declare the Ukraine a buffer state, put any would-be vitims (US or other western allies) in embassies with orders to ship them away from Ukraine. The UN is not doing this, the US is not doing this (US wants Russia as a scapegoat for its economic inflation caused prior to Ukraine by Biden himself). So as a result, people are dying.
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2022 03:45 am
@bulmabriefs144,
Quote:
What are you doing listening to the UN, hightor?

You didn't even address what the General-Secretary said – you saw "UN" and immediately regurgitated a typically myopic and paranoid screed, most of which has no connection to the UN or contemporary political events.
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2022 03:50 am
Zardoz wrote:
Now we are beginning to see the massive amount of damage that can be done by Trump appointed judges. The standard to be selected a federal judge is 12 years of legal experience, Kathryn Mizelle was appointed to be a Federal Judge at 33 with only 8 years-experience, by an all- republican vote. This idiot ruled that Center Disease Control and Prevention is absolutely powerless to make any rules to prevent the spread of disease during a pandemic. If this idiot had been on the bench when pandemic began there would be at least another 2 million dead Americans.

This renders the Center for Disease Control only power to stop the spread of disease to giving advice during deadly pandemics.
This would be much like ruling the police departments can’t do anything about crime, but they can issue advice about what you can do about crime. They suit was bought by a few individuals and usually even if they win their suit it is limited to the individuals that filed the suit but in this case; this 33-year-old idiot struck down the mask mandate for all mass transit in America.

In essence the ruling states, these idiots can spray death in not only in your face but your child’s face also. She could have just as easily ruled that you can spray bullets in someone’s face, they both cause death. The only way to straighten this out is to bring manslaughter charges against those who spread disease by not wearing a mask. The disease can be genetically traced to the person who spread it. Given a choice I wonder which they would rather do, wear a mask, or spend the next 10 years of their life in prison?
0 Replies
 
bulmabriefs144
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2022 04:03 am
@hightor,
Sigh... Perhaps it's easier to just call you an idiot.

It's inflation.

Let's talk about Earth Day for a second, shall we?
Quote:
In fact, the entire Earth Day celebration was created by a hippie, Ira Samuel Einhorn. The problem with Mr. Einhorn is that he is a brutal murderer who is also known as the “Unicorn Killer.” This year, Einhorn celebrated Earth Day in prison, where he is serving a life sentence for the murder of his former girlfriend, Holly Maddux.

Einhorn was a radical activist, an anti-war demonstrator and a friend of renowned revolutionaries such as Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin. At the first Earth Day celebration in 1970, Einhorn was the Master of Ceremonies in an event that was televised worldwide to an audience of millions.

It is worthwhile to note that Earth Day was created by a murderer, who was using the event for self promotion. It was part of the counter culture movement of the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. Today, it is amazing that an event with such a notorious past and a despicable founder is now viewed as mainstream and respectable.


Now let's talk about how all global apocalypse predictions for 50+ years (and if we count Christian and Jewish predictions, 2000+ years) have been wrong. The seasons ( "climate") go in cycles, sometimes you get an unseasonably warm or cold year. Thet predict global warming, only to have the temperature be record cold within the next few years. Or they predict the "climate" (seasons) is getting more extreme, only for weather to be more mild for years. Or overpopulation is gonna cause us to run out of food in just five years (what do you expect us to do? Kill people?) except 20 ywars pass and humanity hasn't run out of food. There is no apocalypse! It's a false doctrine, and the people leading the narrative are eugenists.

What has caused inflation is a lack of interest in farming, fishing, forestry, or trucking. All of these things create scarcity. Yes, we know how to sustainably farm through crop rotation. But if everyone is too psyched about ******* Facebook media influencer jobs and working for the New York Times, the artificial scarcity created by cutting back on the production of food or gas (or withholding food or gas, as seems the case here, since Biden is hellbent on selling "electric" to us) creates high prices, poverty, and ultimately crime.

Lastly, I wanna impress upon you that more of the campaigns to save the environment woefully backfired. They tried to protest the building of a pupline under Trump, citing native American holy grounds. The builders not only quickly cleaned up after themselves (replanted trees, etc) but the protesters left a pile of garbage behind.

https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/us-army-corps-spending-1-million-clean-mess-left-dakota-access-pipeline-protests-native-americans-933x445.jpg

Embarrassing, huh?

Well it's hardly the first problem of so-called environmentalism. In an effort to "save the environment" from so-called acid rain crisis, we started ramping up platic production ( right, because making plastic isn't involving using lots of fossil fuel for no good reason or polluting the air). Paper is biodegradable. Plastic is not, and most of it winds up in the oceans. How, you might ask? Well, some of it is careless beachgoers who are too lazy to walk to a waste bin, or from wind blowing it away anyway. But far more often, it's ironically because our recycling is usually offsite in China. China doesn't give a ****, and some of it tumbles off the boat while other is outright dumped when they have too much and aren't making a profit.

By the way, the left didn't invent recycling. Rag and bone men (also known as junk collectors) used to collect far more than paper, plastic, and metal (including stuff like chicken bones), and would process it all back into usable goods by selling it to a metal scrap refiner or to the company to clean and repackage.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rag-and-bone_man

Now we have these wonderful landfills instead, because recycling made that job "obsolete". Congratulations!


bulmabriefs144
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2022 04:16 am
@hightor,
I don't CARE what the UN has to say.

The only branch of the UN that is worth keeping is ths UNESCO world heritage sites, and even that could be done by a more neutral private organization.

Here's more about the UN.
https://www.aei.org/articles/how-to-defund-the-un/
Quote:
Despite decades of U.N. “reform” efforts, little or nothing in its culture or effectiveness has changed. Instead, despite providing the body with a disproportionate share of its funding, the U.S. is subjected to autos-da-fé on a regular basis. The only consolation, at least to date, is that this global virtue-signaling has not yet included burning the U.S. ambassador at the stake.

Turtle Bay has been impervious to reform largely because most U.N. budgets are financed through effectively mandatory contributions. Under this system, calculated by a “capacity to pay” formula, each U.N. member is assigned a fixed percentage of each agency’s budget to contribute. The highest assessment is 22%, paid by the U.S. This far exceeds other major economies, whose contribution levels are based on prevailing exchange rates rather than purchasing power parity. China’s assessment is just under 8%.

Why does the U.S. tolerate this? It is either consistently outvoted when setting the budgets that determine contributions or has joined the “consensus” to avoid the appearance of losing. Yet dodging embarrassing votes means acquiescing to increasingly high expenditures.


Quote:
Start with the U.N. Human Rights Council. Though notorious for its anti-Israel bias, the organization has never hesitated to abuse America. How many know that earlier this year the U.N. dispatched a special rapporteur to investigate poverty in the U.S.? American taxpayers effectively paid a progressive professor to lecture them about how evil their country is.


Quote:
Next come vast swaths of U.N. bureaucracy. Most of these budgets could be slashed with little or no real-world impact. Start with the Office for Disarmament Affairs. The U.N. Development Program is another example. Significant savings could be realized by reducing other U.N. offices that are little more than self-licking ice cream cones, including many dealing with “Palestinian” questions. The U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees could be consolidated into the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees.


http://committedconservative.com/2017/12/21/defund-the-united-nations-now/
Quote:
Imagine that you are a rich philanthropist who for decades has been, by far, the biggest benefactor of a large and influential charitable foundation. You even allow the foundation to operate out of a luxurious office building that you own. No other contributor comes close to the level of support that you provide to this foundation.

Imagine that the during all of your decades of financial support, the charitable foundation never once said or did anything to express any appreciation for your generosity. In fact, the foundation regularly asserted that you should not expect any gratitude because it is entitled to your financial support.

Now, imagine that, separate and distinct from your support for the charitable foundation, you decide to send one of your children to a church-run school.

Imagine that the board of the charitable foundation historically has shown open hostility to the church that operates that school and now votes overwhelmingly to censure you for sending your children to that school.

Would you continue to give financial support to that foundation?

Today the United Nations voted overwhelmingly to condemn the United States.

What did we do to earn the wrath of the UN? Did we commit a genocide like Germany and Rwanda? Do we sponsor international terrorism? Have we threatened to launch a nuclear war?

No, none of those things.

The UN censured the United States for exercising its sovereign right to decide where to place its embassy in the nation of one of our closest allies.

The problem is that the United Nations hates that U.S. ally.

Why? Because that ally is the Jewish State of Israel. And the United Nations hates the Jews.

Think I’m being sensationalist with that accusation? For sixteen years, from 1975 to 1991, the official position of the United Nations, as reflected in a resolution passed by that organization, was that Zionism – the belief that the Jewish people have a right to a homeland in Israel, is racism. That resolution was repealed only begrudgingly – and far from unanimously – as the result of pressure from U.S. President George H.W. Bush.

More...
Quote:
UN Human Rights Council: From its creation in June 2006 through June 2016, the UN Human Rights Council over one decade adopted 135 resolutions criticizing countries; 68 out of those 135 resolutions have been against Israel (more than 50%).
UN Nations General Assembly: From 2012 through 2015, the United Nations General Assembly has adopted 97 resolutions criticizing countries; 83 out of those 97 have been against Israel (86%).
UNESCO: Each year, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) adopts around 10 resolutions a year criticizing only Israel. UNESCO does not criticize any other UN member state in a country-specific resolution (100%). An exception occurred in 2013, when, under pressure from UN Watch, UNESCO adopted one resolution on Syria.
World Health Organization: For one week every year, the UN World Health Assembly, the decision-making body of the World Health Organization (WHO), meets to formulate global health policy. Resolutions are adopted to address global health issues. There is one exception: the annual resolution entitled “Health conditions in the occupied Palestinian territory, including east Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan,” which singles out Israel for condemnation; no other country in the world is condemned by the WHO.
ILO: The International Labour Organization (ILO) was established to improve conditions of labor, regulate work hours, fight unemployment, assure adequate living wages, and protect workers worldwide. At its annual conference, however, the ILO produces a single country-specific report castigating Israel.


Oh look, UNESCO, which is famous for its world heritage stuff? Doesn't consider Judaism worthy of world heritage.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2022 04:25 am
@hightor,
What are you doing talking to Bulmabriefs Hightor?

You know he's a delusional idiot who believes the World is flat.

Don't waste your time.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2022 05:04 am
@bulmabriefs144,
bulmabriefs144 wrote:
Oh look, UNESCO, which is famous for its world heritage stuff? Doesn't consider Judaism worthy of world heritage.
Alone here in Germany the ShUM Sites of Speyer, Worms and Mainz belong to the World Heritage.
The sites comprise the Speyer Jewry-Court, with the structures of the synagogue and women’s shul, the archaeological vestiges of the yeshiva, the courtyard and the still intact underground mikveh, which has retained its high architectural and building quality.

The property also comprises the Worms Synagogue Compound, with its in situ post-war reconstruction of the 12th century synagogue and 13th century women’s shul, the community hall (Rashi House), and the monumental 12th-century mikveh. The series also includes the Old Jewish Cemetery in Worms and the Old Jewish Cemetery in Mainz.


The Jewish-Medieval Heritage of Erfurt is waiting to be accepted.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2022 08:33 am
A new rule requires agencies to analyze the climate impacts of proposed highways, pipelines and other projects, and gives local communities more input.

Biden Restores Climate to Landmark Environmental Law, Reversing Trump
Quote:
WASHINGTON — The Biden administration will announce Tuesday that it is restoring parts of a bedrock environmental law, once again requiring that climate impacts be considered and local communities have input before federal agencies approve highways, pipelines and other major projects.

The administration plans to resurrect requirements of the 50-year-old National Environmental Policy Act that had been removed by President Donald J. Trump, who complained that they slowed down the development of mines, road expansions and similar projects.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Apr, 2022 06:47 am

U.K. Court Brings Assange One Step Closer to Extradition


https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/20/world/europe/assange-uk-extradition.html

The court formally ordered the extradition of the WikiLeaks founder to the United States, but it still needs approval from a British cabinet minister and his defense can appeal to her directly.


By Megan Specia
April 20, 2022Updated 8:33 a.m. ET

LONDON — A London court on Wednesday ordered the extradition of the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to the United States, the latest but not the last step in a long-running battle in British courtrooms.

The order to extradite Mr. Assange, who is being sought by the United States in connection with charges under the Espionage Act, must be signed by the British home secretary, Priti Patel. Mr. Assange has four weeks to appeal to her directly, and he also has the right to take his case to the English High Court after she issues her decision.

Wednesday’s court decision, delivered in a brief hearing that saw Mr. Assange dial in by video call from a prison in London, was the latest blow to his attempts to fend off his extradition. Protesters, as they have done throughout his legal battle, gathered outside the courtroom in central London.

Britain’s Supreme Court ruled last month that Mr. Assange could not appeal an earlier decision that paved the way for his extradition, bouncing the decision back to the Westminster Magistrates’ Court, which made the decision on Wednesday.

Ms. Patel will now decide whether to order the extradition or refuse the request, but Mr. Assange’s defense team also is entitled to make submissions to her before her final decision is made. His legal team has until May 18 to do so. The Home Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Assange was charged in the United States under the Espionage Act in connection with obtaining and publishing classified government documents about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq on WikiLeaks in 2010. Those files were leaked by Chelsea Manning, a former military intelligence analyst.

Mr. Assange has waged a prolonged legal battle against his extradition following his arrest in London in 2019, after he spent seven years holed up inside the Ecuadorean Embassy in an effort to avoid detention.

His defenders have sought to present the case as a matter of press freedom, and his extradition to the United States could raise major issues about First Amendment rights, experts say.

“The extradition of Julian Assange would also be devastating for press freedom and for the public, who have a right to know what their governments are doing in their name,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s secretary general.


She also said that decision placed Mr. Assange “at great risk of prison conditions that could result in irreversible harm to his physical and psychological well-being.”
glitterbag
 
  0  
Reply Wed 20 Apr, 2022 07:20 am
@bobsal u1553115,
I hope I never have to lay eyes on Assange man ever again.
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Wed 20 Apr, 2022 07:31 am
@bulmabriefs144,
Quote:
Sigh... Perhaps it's easier to just call you an idiot.

Go ahead. It's certainly easier to understand than most of your crackpot posts.
Quote:
In an effort to "save the environment" from so-called acid rain crisis, we started ramping up plastic production ( right, because making plastic isn't involving using lots of fossil fuel for no good reason or polluting the air).

WTF are you even talking about? In order to prevent continued damage from acid rain the power generating plants were required to install scrubbers to remove acidic gases before they enter the atmosphere. "Ramping up plastic production" was not a response to acid rain, it was done to meet the growing demands of the global economy.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  0  
Reply Wed 20 Apr, 2022 09:48 am
Ex-Chicago Officer Who Killed Laquan McDonald Won’t Face Federal Charges



The officer, Jason Van Dyke, had served about three years in state prison for murdering the Black teenager, a killing that put a spotlight on police brutality.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/18/us/jason-van-dyke-charges-laquan-macdonald-shooting.html?action=click&algo=bandit-all-surfaces-time-cutoff-30_impression_cut_3_filter_new_arm_5_1&alpha=0.05&block=more_in_recirc&fellback=false&imp_id=250057587&impression_id=f642a143-c0b8-11ec-90e5-9f8016718a22&index=5&pgtype=Article&pool=more_in_pools%2Fus&region=footer&req_id=332023497&surface=eos-more-in&variant=0_bandit-all-surfaces-time-cutoff-30_impression_cut_3_filter_new_arm_5_1

By Alyssa Lukpat
April 18, 2022

Federal prosecutors said on Monday that they would not bring criminal charges against a former Chicago police officer who served about three years in state prison after being convicted of second-degree murder in the 2014 shooting of Laquan McDonald, a Black teenager.

In a statement on Monday, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois said that, after consulting with Mr. McDonald’s family, it decided not to charge the former officer, Jason Van Dyke, in the killing of the 17-year-old boy, whose murder put a spotlight on police brutality, prompted changes in police procedure and had political ramifications.

The prosecutors said that the bar to convict Mr. Van Dyke on federal charges would have been much higher than the one for state charges. They would have to prove that he knew deadly force was excessive and that his actions “were not the result of mistake, fear, negligence, or bad judgment,” the statement said.

They added that a second round of charges against Mr. Van Dyke “would diminish the important results already achieved.” They noted that a federal judge would have to consider Mr. Van Dyke’s previous sentence and his good conduct in prison.

Daniel Herbert, Mr. Van Dyke’s lawyer and a former police officer, did not immediately respond to emails or phone calls on Monday.

In October 2014, Mr. Van Dyke, who is white and was then on the Chicago police force, responded to a report that a person was breaking into vehicles and found Mr. McDonald holding a knife but veering away from the police. Mr. Van Dyke shot the boy 16 times, firing even after Mr. McDonald had collapsed onto the street.

The shooting was caught on a dashboard-camera video, but the city released it only 13 months later after a judge’s order. The footage prompted protests across the city that denounced both the cover-up and Mr. McDonald’s brutal death.

Mr. Van Dyke was convicted in state court in 2018 of one count of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery with a firearm. He was the first Chicago police officer to be convicted of murder in an on-duty shooting in nearly 50 years.

He was released in February, with credit for good behavior, after having served less than half of an 81-month prison sentence. While it is fairly routine for prisoners to be released early if they demonstrate good conduct, some Chicago activists were outraged. They called on the federal authorities to file civil rights charges against Mr. Van Dyke to make up for what they believed to be a lenient sentence.
Editors’ Picks
Your Questions About Food and Climate Change, Answered
Nicolas Cage Is in on the Nicolas Cage Jokes
Feeling the Squeeze? How to Be a Thrifty Traveler as Prices Soar

Mr. McDonald’s great-uncle, the Rev. Marvin Hunter, did not immediately respond to emails or phone calls on Monday, but he said in February that he did not protest Mr. Van Dyke’s early release.

“Justice, in our eyesight, was getting a conviction,” he said at the time. “It wouldn’t benefit anyone in this country for Jason Van Dyke to go back to jail and get 100 years or 1,000 years.”

But Ja’Mal Green, 26, a former Chicago mayoral candidate who has spoken out about Mr. McDonald’s killing for several years, said that he had wanted the federal authorities to press charges against the former officer.

“The fact that a white man was able to pump 16 bullets into a young Black boy and only do three years in jail? That’s not justice,” Mr. Green said on Monday night.

As a result of Mr. McDonald’s killing, the federal authorities investigated the Chicago Police Department and issued a consent decree ordering hundreds of police reforms. Chicago police officers now wear body cameras while on duty.

The police superintendent and several police officers were fired over the cover-up, which also may have been one of the reasons Rahm Emanuel, the former mayor, did not seek a third term.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Apr, 2022 07:56 pm
Alex Jones Reaches Out to Justice Dept. About Jan. 6 Interview, Wants Immunity





Tweet text:

Spiro Agnew’s Ghost 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
@SpiroAgnewGhost
🚨🚨🚨Alex Jones Reaches Out to Justice Dept. About Jan. 6 Interview and wants immunity from prosecution

An effort by Jones to get an immunity deal is the latest sign of progress in the investigation, which recently brought on a well-regarded prosecutor
Alex Jones speaking to a crowd of supporters of President Donald J. Trump near the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
nytimes.com
Alex Jones Reaches Out to Justice Dept. About Jan. 6 Interview
The effort by the Trump ally to get an immunity deal is the latest sign of progress in the investigation, which recently brought on a well-regarded prosecutor.
4:09 PM · Apr 20, 2022


https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/20/us/politics/alex-jones-jan-6-interview.html

No paywall
https://archive.ph/Wi63c


The federal investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election appears to be gaining traction, with the Justice Department having brought in a well-regarded new prosecutor to help run the inquiry and a high-profile witness seeking a deal to provide information.

Alex Jones, the host of the conspiracy-driven media outlet Infowars and a key player in the pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” movement, is in discussions with the Justice Department about an agreement to detail his role in the rally near the White House last Jan. 6 that preceded the attack on the Capitol.

Through his lawyer, Mr. Jones said he has given the government a formal letter conveying “his desire to speak to federal prosecutors about Jan. 6.”

The lawyer, Norm Pattis, maintained that Mr. Jones had not engaged in any “criminal wrongdoing” that day when — chanting slogans about 1776 — he helped lead a crowd of Trump supporters in a march to the Capitol as violence was erupting.

As a condition of being interviewed by federal investigators, Mr. Jones, who is known for his rants about the “Deep State” and its supposed control over national affairs, has requested immunity from prosecution.

*snip*
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.2 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 09:25:32