13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  0  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 08:58 am
@izzythepush,
They need some gentle pushing back. For right now, its fine with me.

But I do spend weeks ignoring them.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:01 am
@revelette1,
Tony Blair is every bit as guilty as GW Bush.

They should both be prosecuted.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:08 am
@revelette1,
What Russia is doing is of another level. The West was criticised for collaterol damage, civilians dying as a result of bombing other targets. There was also criticism the behaviour of individual soldiers, some of whom were prosecuted.

Russia is doing that and more. They are adopting siege methods like they did in Chechen and Syria. The suffering of the civilian population is a means to an end as it puts pressure on those defending the cities.

There is also summary executions including men with their hands tied behind their backs. Their bodies were then left lying in the street for weeks before they moved out, they didn't even try to hide the evidence.

When Iraqi soldiers were mistreated at least they tried to cover it up because they knew it was wrong.
bobsal u1553115
 
  0  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:09 am
@revelette1,
It's not a matter of degrees. A real investigation would show that degree.

I know what you mean about having mixed feeling regarding another nation/other nations take custody of an American leader.

In the end the interests of humanity is my interest and I know a Democracy cannot stand hiding and ignoring the truth.

My interest in human rights in the end trumps the chauvinism and overweening pride I come by naturally by virtue of being an "American" that was also boosted by military service.

It irks me a little that Izzy is right.But that's purely on me and I can operate in a humanist manner when it just comes on down to it.

Izzy is too smart, too educating, too funny, too much of a standup sort of person - I'll never give that up just to duck the issue of American leaders breaking the law and the embarrassment of it.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:12 am
@izzythepush,
Those US military covered it up by videoing it and sharing it with the world.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  4  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:12 am
Question: By the reporting constantly touting the three republicans who are voting yes as a “rare glimmer of hope for bipartisanship”, doesn’t it serve to excuse and even normalize the racism of their 47 colleagues who are voting no on possibly the most qualified SCOTUS ever, for no apparent (ahem) reason?
bobsal u1553115
 
  0  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:18 am
@snood,
No. Most importantly it gives us Justice Jackson.

The place to fix the GOP's goat is in the ballot booth. They are who they are. If anything it at least shows a movement (maybe glacier-ly slowly) by at least some GOP to begin to see political reality.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 09:52 am
@izzythepush,
I agree with you on all counts. Which puts still in the awkward position of what we do when other countries commit war crimes when our crimes continue to go unpunished. There should have been something at least said about lying WMD and changing the meaning of torture to allow the CIA and all the rest to torture people. We should have to make some kind of reparations to be in a morally right position going forward.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 10:21 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Thank you.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 10:25 am
@revelette1,
The worst aspect of this, and why the US was able to pass such oppressive legislation was the mood that swept the nation post 9/11.

Basically if you weren't in favour of the war on terror you were anti American.

The role of the American media was particularly bad, preferring jingoism to the truth.

I know it's not the case now, but at the time of the invasion of Iraq most Americans believe Iraq had a hand in 9/11 and that was down to the media.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 10:37 am
@izzythepush,
When you're right, you are right - and you are right. Again.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  4  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 03:27 pm

Biden administration will extend freeze on federal student loan repayments through August
The freeze, which has been in place since the beginning of the pandemic, was scheduled to expire on May 1
(cnn)
Rebelofnj
 
  4  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 08:18 pm
@Region Philbis,
It would be foolish to attempt to end the freeze a few months before the midterm elections.

Either the Administration will extend the freeze into 2023, or they will go through the campaign promise and wipe out the student loan debt.

For maximum political capital gains, they could extend through October and cancel the debt in the weeks before the election. That could give the Democrats a much needed boost.
BillW
 
  4  
Reply Tue 5 Apr, 2022 10:22 pm
@Rebelofnj,
Not sure they can cancel without Congressional commitment; ie, a bill.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Wed 6 Apr, 2022 03:30 am
HCR wrote:
Today, former president Barack Obama returned to the White House at President Joe Biden’s invitation to talk about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), popularly known as Obamacare. He noted there have been changes in the White House since he left in 2017. For one thing, “[t]here’s a cat running around,” he joked, “which I guarantee you [his family’s dogs] Bo and Sunny would have been very unhappy about.”

Obama signed the ACA into law in 2010. Today, 31 million Americans have healthcare coverage thanks to it. They can’t be denied coverage because of preexisting conditions. The ACA has lowered prescription drug costs for 12 million seniors, and it has enabled young people to stay on their parents’ insurance until they’re 26. It’s eliminated lifetime limits on benefits.

Republicans have loathed the ACA since Obama signed it into law in 2010. This is a modern-day stance, by the way: it was actually Republican president Theodore Roosevelt who first proposed universal healthcare at the beginning of the twentieth century, and Republican president Dwight Eisenhower who first tried to muscle such a program into being with the help of the new department created under him: the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, which in 1979 became the Department of Health and Human Services. Its declared mission was “improving the health, safety, and well-being of America.” In contrast to their forebears, today’s Republicans do not believe the government has such a role to play.

Last month, Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) said the Republicans’ goal is to obstruct Biden and the Democrats until they retake power, and then immediately make good on old promises like repealing the ACA. Senator Rick Scott (R-FL), chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, has proposed sunsetting all laws after five years and then passing the popular ones again. Since Republicans kill all social welfare bills with the filibuster, it’s not hard to imagine that Scott has the Affordable Care Act in his sights.

Enrollment in healthcare coverage under the ACA is at a record high since Biden took office, since he helped to push enrollment by opening special enrollment periods and dramatically increasing outreach. The law is popular: a poll last month by healthcare analysts Kaiser showed that 55% of Americans like it while 42% do not.

Today, Biden signed an executive order to increase outreach and coverage still further, and to urge Congress to deal with the “family glitch” in the law that determines eligibility for subsidies based on whether the primary enrollee can afford coverage for herself, rather than for her family. Fixing this glitch would lower costs for about 1 million Americans and open up coverage for another 200,000.

Before the signing, Obama, Biden, and Vice President Kamala Harris used the ACA to talk about the difference between the two parties.

Harris noted that “the ACA is the most consequential healthcare legislation passed in generations in our country” and that it was more than just a law, it was “a statement of purpose; a statement about the nation we must be, where all people—no matter who they are, where they live, or how much they earn—can access the healthcare they need, no matter the cost.”

She called on Congress to pass legislation that would let Medicare directly negotiate prescription drug prices with pharmaceutical companies (as every other developed country does). With 60 million people enrolled in Medicare, the program would have significant bargaining power to negotiate prices.

The vice president also called on the 12 states refusing to expand Medicaid to do so, enrolling the 4 million people who are now excluded. Acknowledging those people determined to take away abortion rights, she noted that women without medical care during pregnancy are significantly more likely to die than those who do have it.

Obama then explained why the Democrats worked so hard to begin the process of getting healthcare coverage for Americans. “[W]e’re not supposed to do this just to occupy a seat or to hang on to power,” he said. “We’re supposed to do this because it’s making a difference in the lives of the people who sent us here.”

The ACA shows, he said, that “if you are driven by the core idea that, together, we can improve the lives of this generation and the next, and if you’re persistent—if you stay with it and are willing to work through the obstacles and the criticism and continually improve where you fall short, you can make America better—you can have an impact on millions of lives.”

Then Biden took the podium before signing the executive order, adding that passing the ACA was about dignity. It was about the “countless Americans lying in bed at night, staring at the ceiling, wondering, ‘My God—my God, what if I get really sick? What am I going to do? What is my family going to do? Will I lose the house?’ Discussions we had in my house with my dad when he lost his health insurance—’Who’s going to pay for it? Who’s going to take care of my family?’”

He warned that the Republicans want to get rid of the law. “[P]ay very close attention, folks,” he said. “If Republicans have their way, it means 100 million Americans with pre-existing conditions can once again be denied healthcare coverage by their insurance companies. That’s what the law was before Obamacare. In addition, tens of millions of Americans could lose their coverage, including young people who will no longer be able to stay on their parents’ insurance policy to age 26. Premiums are going to go through the roof.”

“Instead of destroying the Affordable Care Act,” he said, “let’s keep building on it.”

Meanwhile, the Republicans continue to double down on the culture wars that whip up their base. By a vote of 70 to 14, the Oklahoma legislature has just passed a Republican bill making it illegal for doctors to perform an abortion unless the patient’s life is in danger. Violating the law carries a punishment of up to 10 years in prison and a $100,000 fine. There was little discussion of the measure, since lawmakers unexpectedly added it to the agenda Monday night.

Abortion is a constitutional right, defined by the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. It is also popular in the U.S., with about 60% of Americans supporting Roe v. Wade and about 75% believing that abortion access should be between a woman and her doctor. Only 20% say that access should be regulated by law.

Those culture wars are pushing today’s right wing toward authoritarianism as they seek to enforce their views on the rest of the country.

Today, as we learned of more atrocities by Russian troops in Ukraine, the House of Representatives passed a bipartisan resolution that called on the U.S. government to uphold the founding democratic principles of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): “individual liberty, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law.” Since those values “face external threats from authoritarian regimes such as Russia and China and internal threats from proponents of illiberalism,” and since NATO countries have called for a recommitment to the founding values of the alliance, the resolution supports the establishment of a Center for Democratic Resilience within NATO headquarters. The resolution reaffirmed the House’s “unequivocal support” for NATO.

The resolution was introduced by Gerry Connolly (D-VA), who sits on both the Foreign Affairs and Government Oversight Committees, and had 35 other cosponsors from both parties. The vote in favor was bipartisan, with 219 Democrats and 142 Republicans voting yes. After all, what’s there to oppose in a nod to democratic values and diplomacy, when Ukraine is locked in a deadly battle to defend itself against an invasion and brutal occupation by Russian forces directed by authoritarian Russian president Vladimir Putin?

Sixty-three Republicans—those who tend to support former president Trump—voted against the resolution.

substack
Builder
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 6 Apr, 2022 03:48 am
Nothing to see here, folks. Move along.

Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Wed 6 Apr, 2022 05:21 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:
Nothing to see here, folks. Move along.
Sky News Australia might be critised by many, but at least they are more honest than above poster:
skynews.au on above link wrote:
Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro said US President Joe Biden “lied” to the American people when he claimed he did not know about his son’s overseas business dealings.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 6 Apr, 2022 06:59 am
@Builder,
Quote:
Nothing to see here, folks. Move along.


I watched it anyways (I watch/read all the "stuff" you post), and you were right on the money, 'Nothing to see here'. Just a bunch of proven liars screaming hysterically.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Wed 6 Apr, 2022 07:01 am
@hightor,
Man, did Barack look good at the White House!
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Wed 6 Apr, 2022 07:26 am
Trump Aide Matt Mowers Used Parents' Address To Vote Twice

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-aide-matt-mowers-used-parents-address-to-vote-twice-report/ar-AAVSJdN

A former aide to former President Donald Trump voted in two separate presidential primaries in two different states during the 2016 election, according to a report from The Associated Press.

Matt Mowers, who served as a senior adviser in the Trump administration and had a stint at the State Department, reportedly voted by absentee ballot in New Hampshire's presidential primary in 2016.

He later cast another ballot in New Jersey's presidential primary using his parents' address, where he re-registered, according to documents obtained by AP through a public records request.

Mowers' actions could potentially violate a federal law that bans people from voting more than once in "any general, special, or primary election" in different jurisdictions "for an election to the same candidacy or office."

However, the statute of limitations for the offense has lapsed and AP reported on Tuesday that no one has been prosecuted under the section of federal law that deals specifically with this issue, citing analysis from the National Conference of State Legislatures.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.22 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 09:01:26