13
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 08:58 am
@Glennn,
Kinda makes one wonder what scented hairsprays, shampoo and perfumes are all about, don't it.

What I smell from from your nothing burger you're enjoying so much is BS.

Again, send me all the photos from your youth and let me cherry pick them into what I think you are.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 09:09 am
@bobsal u1553115,
This is nothing. Check out the Putin's War thread to see how Glenn struggles with the concept of the petrodollar.

It's like he doesn't understand English.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 09:12 am
@Glennn,
I was wondering if you could put you photo interpretive sills to use on these:

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/08/25/article-2193399-14AEF732000005DC-758_634x889.jpg

https://worldwideinterweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/awkward-high-school-photos.jpg

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/E9W5NamFX48/maxresdefault.jpg

Halloween or what?
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/68/aa/20/68aa2011a4c28b5d51e5cadb91eb922b.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/25/fa/2e/25fa2efc618ab1a0d45424ad84ae5631.jpg


bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 09:15 am
@bulmabriefs144,
This is proof that you're slipping. Most days this "qualified" man cannot remember what town he's in. Or what country he's supposed to be helping.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gsIxP-c83ok

Libya? Syria?


Bullshit. I'm not bothering with this crap any more other than to thumb it down, I don't believe you are even serious anymore.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 09:19 am
@izzythepush,
He's clever enough to form a theory, but not enough to test it with publicly available information. Rational logic is step beyond.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 09:56 am
@bobsal u1553115,
This is going to seem (rightfully so) very shortsighted of me, but I admit, all I care about is the gas prices. If they come down, to me, that will be a good thing.

However, your argument seems like sound logic.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 10:59 am
@bobsal u1553115,
BTW, on the little girl with weird and gothic get up, pretty sure that cosplay. My granddaughter went through the same, but she's getting out of it. Just saying.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/20140118174713IMG_5618_M_-_Desucon_Frostbite_2014_-_matiast1_%28cropped%29.jpg/525px-20140118174713IMG_5618_M_-_Desucon_Frostbite_2014_-_matiast1_%28cropped%29.jpg
Glennn
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 11:42 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Hmm. The only thing missing from the stills you posted is joe.

Builder put up some pics that include joe with the kids. Kinda different from the kids in your pics. If a little girl looks uncomfortable in Builder's set of pics, we know exactly what she's responding to, don't we?
0 Replies
 
Glennn
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 11:48 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Kinda makes one wonder what scented hairsprays, shampoo and perfumes are all about, don't it.

But of course! Everyone knows that when you use scented hairsprays, shampoos, and perfumes, you forfeit your right to have your physical boundaries respected by people like joe.

Where do live where that's the prevailing wisdom??
0 Replies
 
Glennn
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 12:04 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Glenn struggles with the concept of the petrodollar.

No, you have it wrong.

I've made my case in the appropriate thread. The petrodollar system is exactly what I said it was. You can drop by to correct the others whose understanding of it is inferior to yours.

But we both know that that's not going to happen because you have no defense against reality and you know it.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 01:29 pm
@revelette1,
glennn is seriously into photo analysis, I bet he's got a howler for this one!
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 01:32 pm
@revelette1,
I have little qualms with glennnnnnnnnn's photo's of Joe Biden. I have major problem with a an alleged adult ginning up a story that is just plain malicious, totally untrue and obviously trollish.
bulmabriefs144
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 01:59 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
These photos weren't some super-doctored shots.

They were publicly available on CSPAN, and we cringeworthy enough that everyone with half a brain was visibly upset that a pedobear was in office. This did not require "analyzing" anyone with an elementary school degree would look at these and say, "Ummmm this man does alot of creepy sniffing.

https://joebiden.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/19b47454ee26a9f0dee9e56a15a654b29f-17-joe-biden-hillary-clinton.2x.h473.w710-768x512.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/JUHJwMP.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/PnNC4EI.jpeg
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/imageserver/image/methode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F792de58e-5563-11e9-b872-7488e2315159.jpg?crop=3950%2C2222%2C180%2C574&resize=685
Seriously, look at those nervous faces.

They even have (possibly doctored) pictures of him sniffing a few men.
https://i.imgur.com/R84zcBO.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/QsUCYbC.png
https://nameproscdn.com/data-auth/attachments/131/131380-0966d7bafd57380ffa927cd6c1513ab7.data?j=eyJkIjoiaW5saW5lOyBmaWxlbmFtZT1cImJpZGVuIHNuaWZmaW5nIGhhaXIgLSBHb29nbGUgU2VhcmNoLmpwZ1wiIiwiZSI6MTY1MjQ5MzI5MiwibSI6ImltYWdlXC9qcGVnIiwidCI6MTY0NzMwOTI5MiwidiI6MX0&k=5az51nrcL4tNjjZ9igV4_VUTj8M
https://i.imgflip.com/4m0ksv.jpg

And here's a video. Where he is literally fondling children.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SRh5pAr7IQ
"I bet you're bight as you are good looking," he says to a 10-year-old.

At which point, I say, "Stop! Stop! Make this creepy man go away!"
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 02:24 pm
@bulmabriefs144,
Who claims they're doctored? What I claim is they are taken out of context and the claims you make are those who have no direct knowledge of what they claim. All of filthy dirty lies. And of all people I would think you have had experience being accused of things others have no grasp about. I am surprised you cannot see the unfair, untrue charges against Joe Biden with these random photos. Give me every photo ever taken of you since you were six,and I'll knit together a story that'll raise your hair.

Won't be true or factual except in the most general of senses, but I will document the **** out of it with photos.

BTW: Care to cite the law making it criminal to smell hair?

BBTW: The last photo with Premier XI is a total fake, and that you couldn't tell worries me a lot. The photos with the Democratic Congressman are both fake.

Care to make your argument with real photos? Though if that's all you got, you ain't got nothing.
hingehead
 
  3  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 07:55 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
The Zuckerberg photo is completely shooped too. How dumb do you have to be post it/believe it. The reddit thread is literally called fakehistoryporn https://www.reddit.com/r/fakehistoryporn/comments/8cg6un/joe_biden_comforting_a_visibly_nervous_mark/
0 Replies
 
Glennn
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 31 Mar, 2022 08:10 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
I have major problem with . . .

The pics and videos speak for themselves. That you have a major problem with that makes me want to ask you what you can do about that. Should I ask you that, or is that going to create another major problem for you?
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Reply Fri 1 Apr, 2022 02:36 am
@bulmabriefs144,
devder heard of Photoshop? What bullshit.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  5  
Reply Fri 1 Apr, 2022 02:37 am
@Glennn,
creepy glenn.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 1 Apr, 2022 07:16 am
@Glennn,
Quote:
The pics and videos speak for themselves.


They don't say squat.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Fri 1 Apr, 2022 07:16 am
@Glennn,
Glennn wrote:
The pics and videos speak for themselves.

Psychologists have long been concerned with the question of under what conditions information beyond pure facts feels true - and they like to use the word "truthiness" for their studies. Pictures exert a particularly convincing power, as psychologists led by Daniel Derksen of Simon Fraser University have just demonstrated again in a study. As long as a photo only fits the topic, it increases the "truthfulness" of a statement. Important information, on the other hand, does not have to be conveyed by the picture.

Stable truthiness effect across the lifespan.
Quote:
Abstract
When semantically-related photos appear with true-or-false trivia claims, people more often rate the claims as true compared to when photos are absent—truthiness. This occurs even when the photos lack information useful for assessing veracity. We tested whether truthiness changed in magnitude as a function of participants’ age in a diverse sample using materials appropriate for all ages. We tested participants (N = 414; Age range = 3–87 years) in two culturally diverse environments: a community science center (First language: English (61.4%); Mandarin/Cantonese (11.6%); Spanish (6%), other (21%); ethnicity: unreported) and a psychology lab (First language: English (64.4%); Punjabi (9.8%); Mandarin/Cantonese (7.4%); other (18.4%); ethnicity: Caucasian (38%); South Asian (30.7%); Asian (22.7%); other/unreported (8.6%). Participants rated trivia claims as true or false. Half the claims appeared with a semantically related photo, and half appeared without a photo. Results showed that participants of all ages more often rated claims as true when claims appeared with a photo; however, this truthiness effect was stable across the lifespan. If truthiness age differences exist, they are likely negligible in the general population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

The same connection is known from many other studies for other areas. Testimonies are more likely to be believed if they are garnished with some kind of photo. Nonsense claims about neuroscience seem more credible when served with content-less pictures of brains. The same applies to claims about people. These look more serious if they are conveyed with a photo. In times of pandemics and war, the following is probably true: the picture of an FFP2 mask or a shot-up tank may convey little or no information about a concrete incident, but it increases the credibility of the statements illustrated with it.

The driving force is the so-called cognitive processing fluid: a picture helps to mentally digest and imagine a statement more easily - even if the photo does not convey any information. This mental ease alone creates good feelings. And what feels good can convince even top politicians.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 06:41:32