19
   

Monitoring Biden and other Contemporary Events

 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2022 07:34 pm
Now I know the world.is coming to an end:

Howard Hesseman, star of 'WKRP in Cincinnati,' dies at 81
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2022 03:31 am
@blatham,
Quote:
Bad link


A string of bad links actually.

Biden pretending to be on a war footing is categorically a bad link.
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2022 05:20 am
HCR wrote:
Last night, at a rally in Conroe, Texas, former president Trump told supporters that if he runs for president and wins in 2024, he will pardon the January 6 insurrectionists. Observers note that this promise might encourage the bigger fish ensnared by the investigation to keep quiet; Will Bunch of the Philadelphia Inquirer noted that “Trump…is committing a form of obstruction of justice in full public view.” Others note that the promise of pardoning the insurrectionists might well become a litmus test for any Republican candidate in 2024.

That promise of pardons might also be for crimes not yet committed. Trump called for "the biggest protest we have ever had" in New York City, Washington, and Atlanta if the prosecutors "do anything wrong or illegal." The specificity of the cities he mentioned suggests that the cases against him in New York City, Georgia, and Washington are weighing on his mind. "These prosecutors are vicious, horrible people. They're racists and they're very sick—they're mentally sick," he said. "They're going after me without any protection of my rights from the Supreme Court or most other courts. In reality, they're not after me, they're after you."

Observers saw his comments as a call for violence if the various legal cases against him lead to indictments. Crucially, these statements were clearly part of a plan: he did not say them off the cuff but appeared to read them from a teleprompter. It seems likely that as investigators get closer, he is turning to the threat of street violence to try to get them to back off.

It is not clear that will work, since more than 750 people who took to the streets for him in January 2021 are now facing criminal prosecution. Many have blamed him for where they are. It might be hard to rally more people with that history, and it seems that the promise of future pardons might be designed to address that wavering faith.

But Bunch noted that, overlooked by those not attuned to the siren songs of the right, Trump’s use of the word “racist” is a call to white supremacists. Three of the main prosecutors investigating the former president—Fulton County, Georgia, district attorney Fani Willis; New York State attorney general Letitia James; and Manhattan prosecutor Alvin Bragg (who recently took over from Cyrus Vance, Jr.)—are Black. So is Representative Bennie Thompson (D-MS), who chairs the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol.

“It’s both alarming and yet utterly predictable that Trump would toss the gasoline of racial allegations onto his flaming pile of grievances, knowing how that will play with the Confederate flag aficionados within the ex-president’s cult,” Bunch wrote. Trump, he said, “is seeking to start a race war.”

But, as a sign of just how tied the Republican Party is to the former president now, on ABC News’s This Week, today, Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) refused to rule out supporting Trump in 2024 despite last night’s incendiary speech.

Collins’s reluctance to offend the former president didn’t do her much good: tonight, in an astounding statement, he referred to her as “Wacky Susan Collins.”

The statement was astounding not because he was insulting a Republican senator.

Referring to bipartisan congressional discussions about clarifying the law to guarantee that no one ever again will argue that the vice president can overturn the results of an election (this is where Collins came up), Trump claimed those discussions themselves proved the plan his team came up with was, in fact, legal. (It is not.) He went on to say: “Mike Pence did have the right to change the outcome and they now want to take that right away. Unfortunately, he didn’t exercise that power, he could have overturned the Election!”

After more than a year of insisting he just wanted to address the problem of voter fraud, which he falsely claimed had stolen the election from him, Trump just came right out and said he wanted to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Former U.S. attorney and legal commentator Joyce White Vance wrote: “This is what prosecutors call guilty knowledge. And also, intent.” CNN’s Jim Acosta was more succinct: he tweeted, “Coup coup for Cocoa Puffs.”

It is unlikely Trump’s admission was a slip. He tends to put out in public potential criminal activity, like the phone call to Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky, which he—not a whistleblower—first told reporters about. Apparently, declaring it openly makes it harder for people to see it as a crime. That he chose to put this out on a Sunday night suggests that he expects bad news this week.

At the very least, it is impossible to imagine that his promise to pardon the January 6 insurrectionists, his call for protests if he is indicted, and his admission that he wanted to overturn the results of the 2020 election will not stir up politics this week.

What will the Republican leaders who have tied themselves to Trump say now that he has openly admitted he was trying to destroy our democracy?

substack
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2022 05:27 am
@Builder,
Quote:
Biden pretending to be on a war footing is categorically a bad link.

Can you even explain what you mean?
Quote:

Definition of link (noun):

1 : a connecting structure: such as
a(1) : a single ring or division of a chain
(2) : one of the standardized divisions of a surveyor's chain that is 7.92 inches (20.1 centimeters) long and serves as a measure of length
b : cuff link
c : bond
d : an intermediate rod or piece for transmitting force or motion especially : a short connecting rod with a hole or pin at each end
e : the fusible member of an electrical fuse
2 : something analogous to a link of chain: such as
a : a segment of sausage in a chain
b : a connecting element or factor found a link between smoking and cancer
c : a unit in a communication system
d : an identifier attached to an element in a system (such as an index term in a database) in order to indicate or permit connection with other similarly identified elements especially : one (such as a hyperlink) in a computer file

Builder
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 05:12 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Can you even explain what you mean?


You have a president who needs to be reminded on a daily basis, of what his role is. This plays out well for an admin who doesn't need anyone with brains at the helm. Do you need any more information, mister moderator hitor?
izzythepush
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 05:13 am
@hightor,
That would be a no.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 06:56 am
@Builder,
Quote:
You have a president who needs to be reminded on a daily basis, of what his role is.

Where did you obtain that information? What does that have to do with a "categorically bad link"?
Quote:
This plays out well for an admin who doesn't need anyone with brains at the helm.

What are you talking about? Give us an example where "this plays out well", because your statement alone is unclear. I can't tell if you're just babbling or if you actually have a point to make. Does "admin" refer to an administrator or to the administration itself? You really need to firm up your communication skills and stop trying to hold up your side of the argument with silly aphorisms.

Fail.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 07:16 am
The trucker rally was a disaster for Conservatives — and Canada
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 09:29 am
The Real and Dire Reason Behind America’s Crumbling Infrastructure

Instead of repairing roads and bridges, we spend money on police and military budgets. Imperialist priorities are to blame for America’s crumbling infrastructure.

Quote:
https://miro.medium.com/max/1400/1*hOyrwY_qMrgupC53wQxyOA.png

President Joe Biden was recently scheduled to speak in Pittsburgh about the need to repair the country’s infrastructure. That morning, almost as if on queue, the city’s Fern Hollow Bridge collapsed, injuring 10 people.

Pictures of a bright red bus hanging from a sloped section of the collapsed bridge made their way around social media, along with tired jokes about Infrastructure Week — an old jab at the Trump administration’s Groundhog Day-like promises to soon address roads and bridges.

Pittsburgh alone has almost 450 bridges. And Biden promised that “we’re going to fix all of them.” Interestingly, the Pittsburgh bridge was not included in Pennsylvania’s 2021 transportation improvement plan, which identifies projects that can get federal funding.

Years of inspection data show that this bridge had been consistently rated in poor condition for at least a decade. Unsafe bridges like the Fern Hollow Bridge are all too common in the United States.

As the news of the collapse spread online, a 2019 article showing that the state had diverted $4.2 billion from its transportation department’s program for road and bridge repair and given it to state police began circulating on social media, too. But prioritizing the policing of certain populations over poor roads and bridges isn’t a problem limited to Pennsylvania.

The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) graded the country’s overall infrastructure at a C- in its 2021 report card. The ASCE report card indicates that 231,000 bridges need some kind of repair or preservation work, and the total price tag over 10 years is $2.6 trillion. According to a report by the American Road and Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), one in three bridges in the US needs to be repaired or replaced.

During his Pittsburgh speech, Biden touted the $110 billion for fixing roads and bridges in his $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill. Earmarking more money for infrastructure is a good thing, but the amount being allocated to the problem doesn’t even begin to meet the scale of the issue. ARTBA estimates that a staggering 171.5 million vehicles travel over 45,000 structurally deficient US bridges each day. Seems bad.

In a White House fact sheet, the Biden administration says their infrastructure plans include enough money to repair the ten most economically significant bridges and the worst 10,000 smaller bridges. That leaves about 35,000 bridges still needing to be repaired or replaced. Drivers will have to either find a detour or pray that they don’t die driving across these deteriorating bridges.
https://miro.medium.com/max/1400/1*6ijLzIDwzHMwnBi5vzi5pw.png
Image from the Washington Post

Our foreign policy focus means domestic decline

America’s crumbling infrastructure is the backdrop to Biden’s massive military buildup — a game of brinksmanship with Russia. Shipment after shipment of weapons–artillery, ammunition, anti-tank missiles, and more–are headed to Ukraine so they can point them at Russia for us.

It seems no matter who is president, there’s a military push about something somewhere. In nearly 250 years of history as a nation, America has been at peace for less than 20 years. We’ve been at war for more than 90% of our history.

It makes you wonder exactly how much of a priority it is to fix America’s infrastructure when, just a few months ago, Congress approved the biggest defense spending bill in US history. And it was more than Biden initially asked for–$25 billion more. This didn’t happen by accident. Americans weren’t out in the streets demanding more missiles and arms shipments across the globe. It happened because our political priorities are not decided by the American voters, but by a military-industrial complex that profits off of endless war.

The role of lobbying in rerouting money away from domestic priorities can’t be overstated. The military-industrial complex — sometimes referred to as the defense industry — spent $117,231,129 lobbying in 2021, according to Open Secrets.

But lobbying aside, America’s infrastructure is crumbling because those in control of the levers of power in the nation are focused on controlling various international spheres of influence, strategic resources, and supply chain routes. Much like the billions Pennsylvania diverted from its transportation department to state police, America is prioritizing imperial control abroad through military might over its dire infrastructure issues. And it’s not just roads and bridges. It’s the electrical grids, water, and much more. But deaths and injuries from all this crumbling infrastructure amount to acceptable collateral damage for increased police and military capabilities.

If we want to have a serious conversation about rebuilding American infrastructure, we’ll have to start with a conversation around diverting funding away from the police and the Pentagon.

extranewsfeed
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 09:34 am
@hightor,
Don't forget huge tax cuts for the rich.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 10:17 am
While I support the US in its opposition to Russian hegemony in Eastern Europe and Ukraine, it's hard not to see our Cuban policy in a similar light.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 12:27 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
The trucker rally was a disaster for Conservatives — and Canada
Quote:
It was about hating the Prime Minister in the most visible and visceral way possible.

Just how visceral this hatred is on social media has taken me by surprise. These folks just rage and clap each other on the back for raging. The subject that might be ascendant at any point is quite irrelevant. Because this event was covered broadly in media it became a perfect vehicle for these folks who are not well educated but deem themselves exactly that.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 12:40 pm
Unfortunately, stupidity is a greater-danger pandemic right now than Covid.

Lots of that **** goin' around.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 04:10 pm
https://i.imgur.com/gOBQgEX.jpg
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 04:22 pm
@snood,
Amen to that!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 06:54 pm
Man, this **** is SCARY.
A GOP bill in New Hampshire targets "negative" depictions of US history. Its explicit goal: To ensure teachers retain "loyalty" and don't push "subversive doctrines."

They are Joe McCarthy-ing the dang schools!! Retain loyalty?

At the same time there are book burnings and big pushes to censor “undesirable” lessons that make white children uncomfortable.

What the chicken-fried f*ck is happening?

https://www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2021-12-03/teacher-loyalty-bill-would-restrict-how-u-s-history-especially-racism-can-be-discussed-in-school
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 07:23 pm
@snood,
Heather Cox Richardson, in her facebook post today, said she's tossing over in her head (will likely write about this soon) that what we are witnessing here (and in other related "culture war" issues ascendent right now) might be a purposeful fomenting of anger and discontent designed to keep the lower classes (my term, not hers) fighting with each other to prevent them from banding together and going after those with great wealth and power. This isn't a new idea, of course, but that doesn't mean it's wrong-headed.
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 07:38 pm
@blatham,
I gotta tell ya:
Even though I’m sure HCR has a lovely, well-organized theory, I don’t really care WHY free speech is being muzzled, and our schools are being forced to teach whitewashed history…

I just care that it’s happening fast, in a lot of places at once. And I care about how we can STOP it.

I mean, at some point (I reached mine about two years ago) all the analysis is completely useless, and takes on the sound of people trying to distract themselves.



blatham
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 09:23 pm
@snood,
Quote:
Even though I’m sure HCR has a lovely, well-organized theory
Nope. She's mulling. Aside from being a top drawer historian of America (with a very substantial audience) she's also an activist and a promoter of local activism.
snood
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 Feb, 2022 09:24 pm
@blatham,
Did you really miss my point, or just choose to sidestep it?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 11/02/2024 at 06:29:50