Maximos1984 wrote:Mathos:
well u tell me .. which one is better?? a country with a bad leader but secure and safe OR a country with no leader and everything messed up? i'm a little confused and i can't answer that really!
You did answer, and in a perfectly correct manner. Thank you Maximos, and whilst I am only speaking for myself here. I think the war started with your country was the wrong path to take, if any needed taking at all to oust Saddam and occupy Iraq, even if we do need the oil, and the other benefits we obtain.
I do not think any other USA President would have commenced such action, and I am amazed that Tony Blair did not use his influence with America to stop it, I believe he could have done.
Because of this war, we are going to face years of heavy life loss, we too are taking lives of innocent men, women and children. There are those who I agree with who are aware of the difficulties there are (and there are many) in running a country during reasonable levels of peace. The reasons for this particular crime may well be deeper rooted than any of us can imagine, but I sincerely doubt it.