he tends to use his power to tell people to abandon their thoughts and study those of others instead.
If you red carefully you dont find anything of the sort in my above posts. I stated that I wasnt a ranking expert on the Hawaiian hotspot and although many geologists have tried to associate meteor strikes with tectonic activity across the planet, there are always some countering information that refutes many of them. Seeing an occurence between one or two bolide striks and some tectonic activity does NOT create a LAW , in fact there may be no connection at all. It often takes science many yars to follow through to a conclusion.Thinking someone can "Solve" a ntural occurences reasons in a hated internet gab fest doesnt rand up there too high .
I always suggest (and its a standard approach) is to first plow through and inspct the available literature to see whatother workers have found and what evidence they may have. SCIENCE CITATION is an important tool. There is even a subscription service in which a computerized inter relationship search among reports on a specific subject would bgin any reasonable grant application. In order to ask for money to do som research on a project, one does not reach into the ether to "guess" whats known about that subject. One looks to see whats there and then with that in hand,one can intelligently ask for the grant by letting the grnt review committees know that you know what youre talking about. This is the way most research is conducted. If you dont know whats going on, your questions are pretty much irrational. Thats why I gt frustrate with your approach, you sm to think verything coms from within you. As we should always understand ,"we only see farther because we are standing on the shoulders of giants "
SCIENCE CITATION INDEX is one of the best resourcs of this ilk. It dosnt man that you arent good enough, it mwans , on the contrary, that you arent wasting tim on stuff that may hav been done well and compltely years and yars ago. Posting schmecky queries on a web site chat room is a lotta baloney. I know the founder of this site says "Talk with xperts" , I kinda smile at that ad. Noone, not even Newton was right about verything, and noone is an expert at a bank of things.
I always use SCI in my work, as well as ASTM standards of approach.
You wont find much published research on YOUTUBE . The chasm between someone whose making exciting entertainment videos and surviving peer review about it is a mile and a half wide. You really have to now, look into the juried literature because the jury will ask the really embarrassing questions and the readers will punctiliously examine the writer thesis.
I dont even use Wikipedia as a source .USGS, SCI, ASTM, theyre the gold standard. USGS does have a web site but its .gov not .com(Doesnt mean it wont later be found wrong but for today, if its undergone and passe scrutiny, its good stuff)
Think what you wish, It matters very little what you think about me, Im happy and content in my work because every projct is a new st of problems to SOLVE .I get paid for results, not website participation. BUT I never said nor implid that I was an xpert in verything. Im a foot wide and a mile deep. Im a larner in so many subjcts and occupations. When I ask questions , I dont go for rude snipes Im usually courteous. Id suggest you try that also, Youll gt a lot farther. I recall when you first asked a question and I joined in an suggsted a reading source that might have what y
oure looking for. You almost immediately started whining about how I was a horrid person who didnt know a thing about teaching.