A.) Take that up with Tartarin. I think her comments, in context, were interesting, while I don't completely agree. This is what worries me (among other things):
Paul Krugman, from
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/18/opinion/18KRUG.html
That is, I believe, the crux of what Tartarin is saying -- if we do win this war decisively, what next? Mightn't it be better if this train is stopped?
Again, take it up with her, though. That's just my take on it.
B.) I think we all agree that there are situations in which a legitimately elected goverment does illegitimate things. It's important for there to be an ongoing debate, and as much as transparency as possible, as to whether legitimate actions are shading into illegitimacy. I think it is very, very dangerous to sit back and say "Well, they were elected, so they have a carte blance. I'll just wait 'til the next election." I know you are not suggesting as much. Right?