0
   

Affect vs. Effect.

 
 
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 08:52 am
Quote:
The commonest meanings of Affect (a verb never a noun) are:
To produce a change in, To influence, to have an effect on.


[
Quote:
Effectis both a noun and a verb. As a verb it means: 'To accomplish,'to achieve,' To bring about,'To result in';


Quote:
Effect as a noun, 'That which is produced by an agent or cause,' a conseqence of, An impression left on the mind


Well if this doesn't clearify the issue then nothing will.

Thanks for the Posts.
Keep them comming...
Laughing
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 24,658 • Replies: 69
No top replies

 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 10:33 am
Now if we could only solve the "tomato, tomahto" thing...Wink
0 Replies
 
Anonymous
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 12:52 pm
All I can say is good luck.....[lol]
0 Replies
 
Pharon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 06:50 pm
This is chicken and egg.
I'll start this off but don't blame me for what's going to come from it.

It,s TOMAATO the British way. The only way.

This is a TOMAATO post, don't bring Potato into it.

Now Craven and I have had this out before but this time I am going to win.

Bring it on

Arrow
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:00 pm
That's playing dirty! No tomato discussion is complete without potato being tossed in!
0 Replies
 
Anonymous
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:00 pm
well I can't say what effect this is going to have.
0 Replies
 
Pharon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:02 pm
if we are going to have this we should move it...!!!!!
0 Replies
 
Pharon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:04 pm
but here goes,

well it's like this you see,

TOMAATO

Potato

You can give me the first logical reason not to and i'll take it from there.
0 Replies
 
Pharon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:06 pm
All those on my side, HELP

I am going up agaist "The being", I am going to need all the help I can get. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:07 pm
Because English spelling is already illogical enough without that kind of incongruity!

I am soo not " the being "!!!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:09 pm
Pharon is right! And the potato thing is irrelevant to the argument - unless bough and cough have to be pronounced the same!
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:13 pm
bough and cough were written differently (phonetically) before people meddled with English.

Don't make me post the history of English spelling again!
0 Replies
 
Pharon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:15 pm
Do you or do you not have it within your power to do as you please with this site, given of course the restrictions?

If so then in this case that makes you the being and me the underdog.

I't wont be the first time an underdog has one.
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:27 pm
Pharon wrote:
Do you or do you not have it within your power to do as you please with this site, given of course the restrictions?

If so then in this case that makes you the being and me the underdog.

I't wont be the first time an underdog has one.
Laughing


I'd never do that unless I wanted to have an empty site with only myself as a participant.
0 Replies
 
Pharon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:45 pm
O.K so hi dlowan
thanks for the beckup it's nice to know that there are still people out there that know how to speak English.

And I fully agree with you on the bough and cough thing.

And Cray, everthing was written differentely before we medled with it. there was no English as such.
0 Replies
 
Pharon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:48 pm
Craven,
Granted but I know that you are well prepared for this as we have done it before..
lol

so what I mean to say is that I am not prepared but am willing to go at it again to try and knock some sense into you.

Double lol
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:49 pm
I'm having a huge argument with dlowan about this on IM. My bottom line is:

Cultural heritage is nice, both pronunciations are correct. But one makes more sense to those who want to learn.
0 Replies
 
Pharon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:51 pm
That's nice when it works out for you....auh... but you have a point.

that btw doesnt change anything.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:52 pm
But English is so so so illogical in so so so many areas; it's a nigh-on impossible task to clear up all of those inconsistencies, so why not embrace its glorious illogic?
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Nov, 2002 07:53 pm
LOL Ok I concede that I like British pronunciation, is that ok? How about I argue that it sjould be potahto and we call it even?

I like the ahh. What I don't like is incongruity.

edit:

sozobe,

Because I hate the fact that all languages evolved in such a haphazard way and for such stupid reasons. For e.g.: the reason deb's examples (the "ough" words) are spelled the way they are is because Dutch printers added letters for line justification and to amke more money (they were paid per letter).


Since I am stuck with the job of explaining it I recognize that we are better off without such illogical nuances.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Affect vs. Effect.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 04:57:37