aidan wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:In order for me to believe something, particularly something as significant as life after death, I require some evidence that it is so. I am not going to accept a theory of the structure of the universe, which this is, without evidence that it is correct. I need more than just a few anecdotes that someone almost died and thought they were approaching a bright light. Does anyone have any hard evidence, or carefully documented evidence of an afterlife?
The body certainly seems to function as a machine. Medicine treats illnesses in terms of physical cause and effect in the body. Although not all things about the body are understood, its functioning appears to be knowable. Thoughts appear to reside in the electrical and chemical activity of the brain. It would be reasonable in the absence of evidence to the contrary to suppose the body is what it appears to be - a machine - and that if the brain stops working, the thoughts stop flowing. Evidence of an afterlife, anyone?
I hesitate to even put this forward - because you seem to be so stuck on the concrete - what you can touch, see, feel and have proven to you. But my body did stop working, and I was still aware. No bright lights or tunnels or long dead relatives leading me home, or anything like that - but though my heart had stopped - due to an allergic reaction to anesthesia - I later repeated entire blocks of conversation and described events accurately to people who were in the room with me. I'm just telling you what happened to me - I don't expect it to change what you think or believe for yourself. But I do think that instead of being so dismissive of other people's experiences you might at least leave room for the possibility that things might happen differently for other people than they happen for you. An open mind is a wonderful thing. My husband is a doctor - a man of science - not a religious or spiritual bone in his body - but he believes me when I tell him that this happened to me - and he doesn't make light of it or dismiss it. In fact he finds it extremely interesting (and yes, he's informed me about the possibility of a drug and/or natural chemical reaction at the moment of death - which I also fully entertain may have been the cause, because when I say I don't know - I really mean it -
I don't know. But what I
do know is in those moments I felt cared for - like I never have before or since in my life. I don't know by who or by what - but I loved the feeling and for the past eighteen years since that happened to me - I no longer have had any dread or fear of death. It was one of the most wonderful experiences I've ever had - (and I've had a pretty great life, in general).
It is interesting that in response to my statement, "show me some evidence," you imply that I don't have an open mind. I do not quite know how saying, "The body seems to function as a machine. Is there some evidence that more is going on?" indicates an unwillingness to accept new facts, which is what an open mind is. No evidence has been offered for me to have a chance to display an open mind about. Your personal story is simply not acceptable evidence, because (a) it leaves the rest of us nothing to examine as evidence, and (b) you as an individual are capable of being fooled or succumbing to wishful thinking.
If there is an afterlife, it is interesting that in the entire history of our species, no one appears to have ever produced any scientific evidence of it at all, such as a movie of someone's ghost saying, "Here I am." It is incorrect to accept some theory of the functioning of the universe without real supporting evidence. Therefore, all that we are really warranted in assuming about death is what is known, that the person appears to cease, and that thought and consciousness appear to be aspects of the functioning of the brain.
As for your statement that I can only believe what I can touch, see, and feel, that is certainly false. I believe in many things that don't fall into that category, such as atoms, but there is actual evidence for their existence.