1
   

The rank titles I came up with are lame so....

 
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Mar, 2003 01:44 pm
I thought it was a balanced, unbiased and nonprejudicial suggestion to put GURU at the top of the list! Cool

I'm glad that so many of you admired my avatar name suggestions. I'm sure that the moderators will make their decision in due course.
0 Replies
 
dream2020
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Mar, 2003 02:25 pm
Margo, I liked queen of the smegging hippies, too, and all the top posters should have special honorific designations. With their permission though.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Mar, 2003 03:05 pm
It was a cruel act of teasure perpetrated by evil mins on a harmless, innocent woman!
0 Replies
 
mac11
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Mar, 2003 03:23 pm
...or rabbit, as the case may be...
0 Replies
 
Bibliophile the BibleGuru
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2003 10:19 am
CDK: when will a decision be made?
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Apr, 2003 06:16 pm
Has a decision been made?
0 Replies
 
babsatamelia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 08:47 pm
new male = sperm\ both for just hatched
new female = egg /
next level = morning sickness
next level = sooo tired
Welllll , maybe this is a tad tooo female
ok, back to the drawing board

evolutionary terms?? a bit of paleoanthropology?

1. strepsirhines - ( like a tree shrew )
2. tarsiers - ( earliest primate, 38 million yrs ago)
3. anthropoids - subsets are first (a) broad nosed monkeys
next (b) downward nosed monkeys
4. cattarrhines ( more of the same )
5. hominoids (evolved during Miocene Epoch 25 to 5 million yrs ago)
6. primates ( about 98.5% of the genes in chimpanzees are identical
to those in humans - ought to give our members a
little bit of humility, eh? Laughing )
7. australopiths (the first humans about 4 million years ago
and, naturally this goes on and on and on - could be quite an
extensive list considering bipodal characteristics etc etc. the
females being only 3 ft tall, males 5 ft tall - more ape like in
some ways than human.... but.....hey, it's just an idea
.............................
I actually like the original names you came up with, maybe
we should simply expand on that - I don't think they are nerdy
or anything. Do you?????
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 08:53 pm
I always liked 'em.

One thing we DO know - if they are changed, or kept, a lot of people won't be happy!

I am not convinced we are capitalist by nature - but I DO know we like to complain...
0 Replies
 
Algis Kemezys
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2003 05:51 am
Naw, everything is getting too corny. I think your first instinct and choices are good. As Aristedes Pasperakis says. "Never try to make good better. You'll only wreck it.
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2003 06:11 am
How many Content Specialists are there?
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2003 02:54 pm
New Haven wrote:
How many Content Specialists are there?


The number varies. Currently it's in the 20s.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How to use the new able2know - Discussion by Craven de Kere
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
I'm the developer - Discussion by Nick Ashley
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
A2K censors tags? - Discussion by hingehead
New A2K Bugs - Discussion by sozobe
New A2K annoyances - Discussion by sozobe
The a2k world is changing 3: about voting - Discussion by Craven de Kere
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Welcome to the 'New' My Posts - Discussion by Nick Ashley
The "I get folksonomy" club - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 08:38:48