Yes, how foolish and un-gallant of me . . .
You were a mere babe in arms in 1970, n'est-ce pas? Barely more than a twinkle in your father's eye . . .
Hey-I'm not responsible for all this.I merely reported what two Brit newspapers have said.I can't answer for any of this stuff.It has nothing to do with me.
It was in the service of cross cultural fertilisation which I am all in favour of.
Lola wrote:Setanta wrote:I recall reading once that a woman in a Kinsey follow-up study experienced 50 consecutive orgams. Allegedly, the researcher commented that the woman was exhausted . . . but very happy.
And it's a very nice sense of satisfaction too.
See! Are you joking? Lets be serious.
You are serious? Oh. My. Gawd.
Why couldn't I been a woman?
I'm sure you want to fertilize someone or something, but this is a family program, so straighten up . . .
spendius wrote:Hey-I'm not responsible for all this.I merely reported what two Brit newspapers have said.I can't answer for any of this stuff.It has nothing to do with me.
It was in the service of cross cultural fertilisation which I am all in favour of.
Thats cool.
Don't you find it a little odd that the Brit paper said Brit's lasted longest?
I wonder what Rio's(Brazil) main newspaper or Kenya's top selling newspaper would print? You think the Brits would actually come out on top in those places?
You must admit though, they got you to buy their rag! And you could read it and feel good about yourself!
___
I still don't get the "fabulous -other 2" reference above?
EM:-
Well I tried something I'm not used to and nothing came up.Maybe the link didn't work.I'm an amateur.
EM:-
Well I tried something I'm not used to and nothing came up.Maybe the link didn't work.I'm an amateur.
spendius wrote:Well I tried something I'm not used to and nothing came up. I'm an amateur.
The straight lines that are flying around in here are killing me. Just killing me.
It's been like that for a week or more . . . i don't get off half the posts i could because i'm laughin' too much . . .
EM:- The "fabulous" was for the post.I liked it.It made me laugh.I hope I didn't respond inappropriately.
I heard Guiness Book of World Records or some such somewhere, anyway, the "official" record for most sexual partners in 24 hours is like around 324 or something by some woman. And I think they said she could have done more...
Perhaps its time for a google...
The thing I don't get is (and lady experts, please enlighten us)--I've been in situation where you're with your woman and you as a man are having "a good night" and you are lasting for hours. But, as has been noted, after an hour or so (or sometimes much less)--the woman will say, "honey this is great, but I'm getting kind of raw...." And I think they are being honest.
The thing I don't get is if most women, in reality get raw & sore after and hour or two of it, how the hell do these other people have sex with 300 people or even 50 or whatever, without just being torn to shreds down there?
Doesn't make sense?
Ladies?
Setanta wrote:Yes, how foolish and un-gallant of me . . .
You were a mere babe in arms in 1970, n'est-ce pas? Barely more than a twinkle in your father's eye . . .
Set,
Who are you addressing here? Surely not me. I was born in 1946 so I was, let's see about 24 in the Fall of 1970, and I was a little hard to handle. But I was busy making hay while the sun shone at the time.......and I was paying little attention to much else.
What was the seven minutes thing?
Gee-Quiz Nite.
Question 17 was how many kilometers is the coastline of the British Isles.They all looked at me because I'm the one they always look at when they're stumped and I said-"I don't know but I've f**ked Jennifer Whiteside over a couple of hundred meters of it."
A book in 1970, and a motion picture in 1971 . . . had the bible belt writhing in apoplexy. Here, i'll go git ya some links . . .
ehBeth wrote:spendius wrote:Well I tried something I'm not used to and nothing came up. I'm an amateur.
The straight lines that are flying around in here are killing me. Just killing me.
See Lola! I'm improving! I thought of about 50 jokes for this one, but I am not touching it. I am leaving it alone. And its really hard, too. My fingers are actually aching, but I'm not letting them do it...What do I get? Do I get a prize? :wink:
Spendie, spare a kiss on the cheek for my kindness toward you above?
spendius wrote:EM:- The "fabulous" was for the post.I liked it.It made me laugh.I hope I didn't respond inappropriately.
You're always inappropriate, Spendi. That's one of your best features.
I'm beginning to think that some of you guys are hard up and don't know what to do with it.
I must depart for my long snooze.
You're an ace bunch.
Here ya go, darlin' . . . the paper of record reviews
The Seven Minutes . . .
Not all Russ Myers movies featured women with watermelon-sized boobies . . .
G'nite Spendius.
Don't forget to set your stopwatch!
I think you Brits may last the longest in "solitary" pursuits--perhaps what the article really meant...
Setanta wrote:A book in 1970, and a motion picture in 1971 . . . had the bible belt writhing in apoplexy. Here, i'll go git ya some links . . .
Please do, Set. I was deep in the bible belt at the time and there was little else to do but get laid. But I went to church and smiled innocently like all other little sex pots.
