I still wanna know how the gobshite can claim that seven mins is a statistically significant sample.
Nope Lola:-
This show puts TV on the sidelines.It is going to sweep the world.Let's hope it is a good thing eh?
yes, maybe so, Spendi.
But this discussion, (yucka yucka) is causing me and my guy to feel hugely abnormal. Where was this study conducted? And were there only 7 men for real?
Where'd they get these men anyway? And did the ladies complain?
The MG says the men in the study must have been eating too much minute rice. I'm sure that explains it.
EM:-
Fabulous.
Didn't dig the other two though.
But fabulous.
Lola wrote:And were there only 7 men for real?
Where'd they get these men anyway? And did the ladies complain?
It's right there in Spendius' headline . . . seven mins . . . he refuses to divulge any information on the wimmins . . .
Yes 7 is a ridiculously small sample size. Unusable.
And yeah, wouldn't you have to use the same women, too? To control for all variables.
Then again, you'd have to get each woman in the equal state of freshness.
Additionally: You've probably heard things to the effect of "The poor have the best sex."
Maybe so, maybe not.
In any event, you'd need to sample of cross-section from each nation's socioeconomic makeup, sample reps of the races, geographical locations, professions, ages, blah blah blah ad infinitum.
Actually this study would be relatively difficult to pull off properly.
Did they do all the above, and the much more that I've no doubt failed to mention?
Setanta:-
So do I.It doesn't ring any bells with me except once when I got stuck in a cheap hotel after having my car stolen at a Dylan gig and I woke up nine tenths of the way up a tentpole in the middle of the night and she agreed as long as I was quick about it.It was my short Turkish delight period.
Has no one here never experienced the fun of just *ucking? What's the rush? A man can fall over the cliff any time, but why waste the evening?
It's true that women may have more fun, but I do believe, as I've been told that a woman's pleasure is exciting and fun for a min. That's what I've observed. And I don't think he's faking.
Setanta wrote:Lola wrote:And were there only 7 men for real?
Where'd they get these men anyway? And did the ladies complain?
It's right there in Spendius' headline . . . seven mins . . . he refuses to divulge any information on the wimmins . . .
LOL! You got us again Set.
But I thought there was no more joking allowed on this thread? Or does that only apply to moi?
Didn't Kinsey cover this stuff? Surely he did. Must I google?
Lola wrote:Has no one here never experienced the fun of just *ucking?
um, no? am i missing something? anyone seen my stopwatch?
I recall reading once that a woman in a Kinsey follow-up study experienced 50 consecutive orgams. Allegedly, the researcher commented that the woman was exhausted . . . but very happy.
EM, you are joking, aren't you? No more joking?....just try it.
Surely Miss Lola, you recall the book The Seven Minutes and all the brouhaha surrounding it?
Lola wrote:Didn't Kinsey cover this stuff? Surely he did. Must I google?
I think he covered some of it. And he did a lot of it fairly well, but some scientists now question a lot of his stuff. Like it needs to be done again with modern methods. Some criticize him for example, in the area of he was a zoologist by training, not a sex expert per se. Seems about the same to me though. But there is no question he pioneered studies of this sort in USA.
And I don't think he got into comparing the times of various nationalities of men...
Setanta wrote:I recall reading once that a woman in a Kinsey follow-up study experienced 50 consecutive orgams. Allegedly, the researcher commented that the woman was exhausted . . . but very happy.
And it's a very nice sense of satisfaction too.
Setanta wrote:Surely Miss Lola, you recall the book The Seven Minutes and all the brouhaha surrounding it?
I'm afraid not Set. I was over protected in my earlier life. So I'm making up for it now before it's too late.
Lola wrote:EM, you are joking, aren't you? No more joking?....just try it.
OK. Gosh. No more joking.
Just straight up pure unadulterated serious enjoyment of *ucking.
Actually, that sounds pretty good. No joke.
