Ah yes, Set. I remember Russ Myers movies well. I stood in a long line to see Vixens. But the Seven Minutes, I must have missed. Shows you where my mind was at the time. My interest in current events came upon me much later in life.
Those kinds of things are always happening in the Bible Belt. The actual stuff seems to be ok, but let someone get serious about it and all hell breaks loose.
Good night Spendi. Sleep tight.
In another thread, i told about watching The Graduate at a theatre in Huntington, West Virginia in 1968. I was raised in the South, but with few illusions. When i was about 14, i asked my Aunt, with whom i then resided, why she had married five times. She reponded: "Sex is great!" I got horribly embarrassed and everyone laughed. She responded: "What . . . it is . . . you think if the boy doesn't know he won't soon find out?"
I walked into one of those big, old-fashioned movie theaters in Huntington, just killin' time, and the movie was the The Graduate. Typically for the time and locale, all the boys were in suits and ties, and all the girls wearing formals such as one wore to the prom in those days. The theater was locked in a stunned silence throughout. There were probably nearly a thousand people in there, and two were laughing--me and a woman about a hundred feet away from me, a middle-aged woman with a cynical demeanor.
As i left the theater, couples stepped back, as though fearing a contagion.
very funny story, Set. I remember on a Saturday afternoon in about......I'm not sure maybe 1959 or so, I sat in the back of the theater with Tommy G and necked while we watched No Down Payment. We all thought it was the racist movie ever.....and it was..... at the time. I'm sure if we saw it today, we'd wonder what the big deal was.
You see, there is progress after all.
Dear Spendius,
Sadly, I have just learned another fact which potentially clouds the study results:
The British men, coming from the reserved nation they do, are the only men who insisted on wearing condoms for the tests. The other men went bare. Some of the Brits, in fact, insisted on wearing 2 condoms.
Would you say that taints the results further?
So you're saying the time it took to take off 2 condoms
was counted into the minutes the Brits were able to perform?
Well, bloody cheaters, aren't they?
LOL!
tsk tsk tsk, CJ I am disappointed in you.
Surely you know that with a condom on, it desensitizes most men to the point to where it takes MUCH longer to ....finish.
It would skew the results totally.
You've never experienced this? :wink:
I hope Spendie knows I am only joking with him. For some reason I love to joke with the Brits. I actually really like (most) of them a lot.
I love their cerebral comebacks to when they get insulted. They are among the best. I guess I need a book on "British Insults" or something to keep me occupied.
Lord Ellpus is particularly outstanding and outrageous in self-depracating himself as an ambiguously gay Brit (which I know he probably isn't).
Its like Monty Python and the Kids in the Hall? Great Stuff.
Damn I liked the Kids in the Hall. I must look that up. I probably have the name wrong? Might have been Kids Down the Hall or something? Like some ambiguously gay too smart self-effacing punk rockers and whatnot. If you haven't seen it, you must. Must be on DVD somewhere, I think it came out in the 80s or so. Lord Ellpus, were you in it? You should have been, dahling! :wink:
CalamityJane wrote:No
Well you are probably so damn hot, the guy can't last long with or without condom.
But let me tell you: With more marginally attractive or hot women, all else being equal, the man with condom can last much longer than man without condom.
But there is always a down side: man with condom lasts longer, but his enjoyment level goes way down. Doesn't matter how long it is.
Hence: "Its like taking a shower with a raincoat on"
____
I have to repeat to Spendie though--I was only JOKING that the Brits in the study wore condoms....(I think). :wink:
extra medium wrote:CalamityJane wrote:No
Well you are probably so damn hot, the guy can't last long with or without condom.
See and that gets back to another ironic part of the study:
Sometimes the hottest sex is over the fastest! I mean, yes all single men probably want to make love to a hot chick for hours or whatever. But the ironic thing is, the hotter she is and the hotter the guy gets for her, etc, the sooner it will all be over--all else being equal.
Thus my prior joke above regarding: Yes, the British lasted longer, but it was just a dull 7.6 minute perfunctory robot like sex. The other nations were ultra-hot and over a bit sooner....
ahhh...but it was all a joke anyway that apparently some took seriously...
So CJ,
You seem like one that would be willing to tackle my question above:
The world record number of sexual intercourse partners by one woman in 24 hours is 324 or something like that.
Yet most women you really talk to about it are really actually getting sore or whatever after about an hour or maybe two or so.
So how the hell could a woman keep going for 24 hours with 300 people in one 24 hour period? How is that possible?
I actually was googling this, but couldn't find much, when you put in the correct search phrases, you of course just get all this porn crap that I absolutely detest of course... :wink: but it doesn't answer my quite scientific of questions.
extra,
we're all joking here, and I don't think anybody takes
either the survey or the comments all too seriously.
If they do, it's their problem not yours. So stop fussing
over it.
I think you are correct. Except for Spendie. I worry about him sometimes.
We're right in the middle of a great conversation, banter flying back and forth, he's laughing...
Then Boom! He's pissed.
ah well. Is that a female trait?
Don't worry about spendius - he can take care of himself,
otherwise he wouldn't have taken the name of his favorite fictional character Spendius.
To answer your question: Not every woman is built the same,
some have more elasticity than others, and therefore have
less of a likelyhood to get sore.
As I said before, my attention span is short - I personally couldn't imagine having nonstop intercourse for 3 hours.
If you rub the inside of your ellbow for three hours you'd
get sore as well.
extra medium wrote:So CJ,
You seem like one that would be willing to tackle my question above:
The world record number of sexual intercourse partners by one woman in 24 hours is 324 or something like that.
Yet most women you really talk to about it are really actually getting sore or whatever after about an hour or maybe two or so.
So how the hell could a woman keep going for 24 hours with 300 people in one 24 hour period? How is that possible?
I actually was googling this, but couldn't find much, when you put in the correct search phrases, you of course just get all this porn crap that I absolutely detest of course... :wink: but it doesn't answer my quite scientific of questions.
Well, let me suggest something about this question. Some women are higher milage than others........that is they have managed to find longer lasting lovers and therefore aren't likely to be saying uncle any time soon.
And there is something to be said for the older woman.
CalamityJane wrote:Don't worry about spendius - he can take care of himself,
otherwise he wouldn't have taken the name of his favorite fictional character Spendius.
To answer your question: Not every woman is built the same,
some have more elasticity than others, and therefore have
less of a likelyhood to get sore.
As I said before, my attention span is short - I personally couldn't imagine having nonstop intercourse for 3 hours.
If you rub the inside of your ellbow for three hours you'd
get sore as well.
Little rests are the key. A glass of wine, a little snack....some conversation and then off you go again.
Whew...Is it getting hot in here or is it just me?
