Setanta wrote:The serious posters are getting sex down and breaking its arm . . .
Hey, if we could approach the study and performance of sex with the intensity and thoroughness we approach other endeavors and subjects of debate and discourse...
EM:-
It isn't me mate.I simply posted an item from our Sunday Times I thought you might be interested in.That's quite common.
It turned out you were interested.I have just responded to your interest.If you're not I'll let it drop.
spendius wrote:I only introduced a prurient tone to the thread because I know you like it.I can do other things if you wish.It's just fascinating reducing the globe to a pub.
I know, the prurient tone introduction was such a shame. The original Thread Question by my good friend tcis of "Should You REALLY Marry a Hot Men?" was so much more intellectual and pure.
tcis and I by the way, are very close (hint hint)
....we could perhaps learn something useful for a change.
See-I can finish off sentences if you can't.I offered two last night and what happened.
spendius wrote:EM:-
It isn't me mate.I simply posted an item from our Sunday Times I thought you might be interested in.That's quite common.
It turned out you were interested.I have just responded to your interest.If you're not I'll let it drop.
Spendius!
I'm sorry, perhaps I joke too much. I am only joking.
I have enjoyed our interaction thoroughly. Don't let anything drop!
Sometimes jokes come off as serious here--My apologies.
Keep on doin whatever you want...seriously
Okay, who kidnapped Spendius and is now typing at his computer grumpily?
Pour another drink friend, take a deep breath, and relax.
All the joking aside, you're with friends...ya know that right?
EM:-
You can joke as much as you wish.If they are good-good.If not it's water off a *uck's back.
spendius wrote:Too tame your worship.
Use your knickers.They'll slap better I should think.
Spendius,
So I guess you are saying we shoudn't post jokes like the one above (and many more of yours too countless to cite...) :wink:
(must of touched a nerve....) 
Damn!I just lost an ace post.No idea what happened.I'll never get it back.Damn!Damn! Damn!
extra medium wrote:Lord Ellpus wrote:Weeeellll, those cheap motels ought not to hide things.
Nothing like searching round a strange room, whilst one has one's very own personal javelin.
Well you are supposed to let go of your boyfriend's javelin prior to looking for the tissue. Makes it easier without 2 people stumbling about in the dark in a seedy hotel room
Gosh, you are an even worse nympho than I had imagined! :wink:
Not exactly an Anglophile, are you, old boy.
He is just fanatically dedicated to posting a response to every post in every thread he's in these days, Lordimtired, he'll grow out of it . . .
How's the kilt fittin', Setanta?
Com'ere Baby, i'll show ya . . .
Well that was a bit of a surprise !
I hadn't expected a tattoo just there
Lord Ellpus wrote:extra medium wrote:Lord Ellpus wrote:Weeeellll, those cheap motels ought not to hide things.
Nothing like searching round a strange room, whilst one has one's very own personal javelin.
Well you are supposed to let go of your boyfriend's javelin prior to looking for the tissue. Makes it easier without 2 people stumbling about in the dark in a seedy hotel room
Gosh, you are an even worse nympho than I had imagined! :wink:
Not exactly an Anglophile, are you, old boy.
There there boys & girls!
Didn't your mum ever tell you that when someone jests with you, that means they kind of like you?
Now I'm beginning to have my doubts though.
When we stop joking with you, thats when to be offended...
Very well. All jokes aside.
In all seriousness: Should You Marry a REALLY Hot Men?
Another take on the survey from the Daily Mirror.
The expert scientist was one Dr Marcel Waldinger who is described as a neuro-psychiatrist based at the Utrecht University.He is reported as saying that " the wide range among normal men points to a physical rather than a psychological cause."
"Brits are well ahead of the pack" it says.
Best performance measured was 44 minutes and worst,or best depending on your point of view,was 30 seconds.It didn't say whether that was in Manhattan or not.
Circumcised men go for 40 seconds longer,which must make the long forgotten pain worth every wince,than "those who haven't had the operation."
The headline reads-
7 MINS 36 SEX.
What, they only interviewed seven mins . . . sh!t, that's no statistical sample . . . what about the wimmins, did they talk to the wimmins?
Steanta:-
Women can go as long as the stop watch spring lasts.And some more as well.
Didn't you know that.It's effortless for them you see.
Quote:It's just fascinating reducing the globe to a pub.
Very funny Spendius.....you do have a way with words.
Have you ever seen the Larry David Show?
And quality.
What about the issue of sometimes the worst sex lasts the longest? I mean if s/he is duller in bed, there is every indication it might last longer. Its going to take you longer to finish... I mean, some of the hottest women I've been with, its over in a few minutes. (Well the first time of the evening, anyway.)
And also, the enjoyment factor. As has been noted above, longer in duration is not necessarily better. Give me 7 minutes of hot stuff over 45 minutes of drudge mind-numbingly perfunctory sex any day.
And what about other nationalities? Pretty small sample size.
And were they all told they were being timed? It sounds almost as if they were.
There are so many factors. What of this factor: A certain nationality guy is so hot, he makes his mate orgasm more quickly, therefore feeling free to orgasm more quickly himself. Versus the slob who just schleps along for minutes and minutes longer, never really turning his mate on much, not bringing her to orgasm, just schlepping along like a robot, til he reaches his alotted, time, then he "punches his clock." Rubber stamped & mailed in.
And taking off of Set's point: Did certain nationality women want it longer? Did they all 100% enjoy it more if it was longer 100% of the time?
Very well, if everyone is done with their jokes (or not), lets analyze the validity of this study.
We have not even begun to really look at it from the validity of study angle.
