Quran and age of Universe

When sight is confounded, and the moon is eclipsed (hidden from view), And sun and moon are united. (Appear as one light) Quran 75:7-9)

They will ask about the mountains, say: My Lord will break them into scattered dust And leave it (earth) as an empty plane, so you see neither curve nor ruggedness. Quran 20:105-107

When the sky will be like molten copper and the hills will be like flakes of wool.(Quran:70:8-9)

And heaven is opened and becomes as gates. (Quran 78:19)

On the day when their tongues and their hands and their feet Testify against them as to what they used to do. Qur'an 24:24

Quote:

The Nazis actions toward the Jews did have a religion components or excuse.

Oh so you think the Nazis killed 6 million Jews because the Jews once killed one (1) Jew called Jesus. Doesn't make much sense...

Nazism was premised on the social interpretation of Darwinism by Ernst Haeckel, who conceptualized scientific racism. Nazism therefore came from science, not from religion.

for some non-Muslims science may confirm that Quran is the true message

Still, Nazism and also Communism are conceptually grounded in science and on the rejection of traditional Christian religions. That's a fact. You can call it pseudo science, but many scientists adhered to ot at the time, e.g. eugenism was considered perfectly scientific and appropriate by many mefical doctors and biologists, prior to WW2.

I could also call the crusaders and pogromists "pseudo-religious" to get religion off the hook, but that's too facile for me.

Scientific nonsense is still scientific, even though it's nonsense. Just because a theory is proven false doesn't mean it's pseudoscience. The term "pseudoscience" cannot be reasonably applied to genetics and biology. Darwin was not a "pseudo", nor was Haeck. And Marx's analysis of capitalism is fairly decent economics, overal.

You are unable to accept the scientific origins of Nazism because you worship or idealize science, like any goddamn believer..

Superior: The Return of Race Science
by Angela Saini
Superior tells the disturbing story of the persistent thread of belief in biological racial differences in the world of science.

After the horrors of the Nazi regime in World War II, the mainstream scientific world turned its back on eugenics and the study of racial difference. But a worldwide network of intellectual racists and segregationists quietly founded journals and funded research, providing the kind of shoddy studies that were ultimately cited in Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray’s 1994 title The Bell Curve, which purported to show differences in intelligence among races.

If the vast majority of scientists and scholars disavowed these ideas and considered race a social construct, it was an idea that still managed to somehow survive in the way scientists thought about human variation and genetics. Dissecting the statements and work of contemporary scientists studying human biodiversity, most of whom claim to be just following the data, Angela Saini shows us how, again and again, even mainstream scientists cling to the idea that race is biologically real. As our understanding of complex traits like intelligence, and the effects of environmental and cultural influences on human beings, from the molecular level on up, grows, the hope of finding simple genetic differences between “races”—to explain differing rates of disease, to explain poverty or test scores, or to justify cultural assumptions—stubbornly persists.

There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.

In actual fact, eugenism and racism were widely shared ideas among leading biologists, medical doctors and anthropologists from the 19th century up until the second world war. It took the Holocaust to suck scientific credibility out of eugenism.

And it's cropping up again today, why with the Nazis getting out of the woodwork... Ignore history at your peril.

Race Is a Social Construct, Scientists Argue
Racial categories are weak proxies for genetic diversity and need to be phased out
By Megan Gannon, LiveScience on February 5, 2016
Race Is a Social Construct, Scientists Argue
Credit: Christopher Futcher ©iStock.com
More than 100 years ago, American sociologist W.E.B. Du Bois was concerned that race was being used as a biological explanation for what he understood to be social and cultural differences between different populations of people. He spoke out against the idea of "white" and "black" as discrete groups, claiming that these distinctions ignored the scope of human diversity.
Science would favor Du Bois. Today, the mainstream belief among scientists is that race is a social construct without biological meaning. And yet, you might still open a study on genetics in a major scientific journal and find categories like "white" and "black" being used as biological variables.
In an article published today (Feb. 4) in the journal Science, four scholars say racial categories are weak proxies for genetic diversity and need to be phased out. [Unraveling the Human Genome: 6 Molecular Milestones]