McG
Quote:I hope you've read more than the lame, paranoid delusions that have been posted on A2K. If you had, you would know that nothing has been decided yet regarding the database, the RFID, or even what will be required to be on the ID.
The RFID part has/will be implemented. Hell, starting in September of this year, they will be in new Passports issued by the US. Did you know that?
It doesn't matter that they haven't announced what they eventually choose to be required on the ID, because there are two considerations that you have to think about:
1, no matter what the information is, it has to be stored in a centralized, accessable database that can be used for a wide variety of purposes. This is the DEFINITION of a security risk; multiple points of access. The more there are, the more have to be defended, and we all know that it is difficult to defend databases as it is. There is no logical reason to believe this will change.
2, in order to be at all useful, there will HAVE to be a certain amount of your personal and private information stored within it. Therefore the fact that you don't know what that information is at this point does not preclude the ability to predict that in order for the system to function, there must be sensitive information involved; there's no point otherwise.
I've been studying this issue, and RFID tags in general, for three years. I have read an extensive amount of industry and research articles on the subject as well as social articles on the possible implications. I am well aware of the staggering benefits for our society that can be offered by RFID chips, as well as the dangers. Do me a favor and don't accuse me of not knowing what I'm talking about on this subject again.
Cycloptichorn