1
   

They're Finally Doing It...And It's About Time

 
 
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 07:48 pm
Bush and his merry band of scumbags are finally overreaching...and people arer waking up...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050519/ap_on_go_co/patriot_act_1&printer=1

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7899754/

Wake up!! Wake up!!!! Take back America!!!!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,112 • Replies: 55
No top replies

 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:05 pm
Unfortunately, there are still too many who believe that's exactly what Bush is doing with his policies--taking back America.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:06 pm
candidone1 wrote:
Unfortunately, there are still too many who believe that's exactly what Bush is doing with his policies--taking back America.


but less and less of them everyday..... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:18 pm
I suppose the next logical step would be to simply do away with the judicial branch of the government altogether and institute the kind of kangaroo courts that Stalin set up in the 1930s to try dissidents. Five minutes before a judge, a confession read in open court, then a bullet in the back of the head. I swear, this country might be girding for a revolution.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:37 pm
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
candidone1 wrote:
Unfortunately, there are still too many who believe that's exactly what Bush is doing with his policies--taking back America.


but less and less of them everyday..... :wink:


Why not give them the powers they need to combat terrorists here on American soil? I know you are concerned about abuse, but has there been any abuse? Have there been any reports of abuse? Have people disappeared off the streets never to be seen again?

Given how the media operates here it wouldn't be hard to figure out if they are abusing the power. I'm willing to give my govt the benefit of the doubt on issues such as this. Do you not want to because you don't like this administration? Would you object as strongly if it were someone who you liked and trusted.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:43 pm
I absolutely would object as strongly.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:43 pm
Quote:
I'm willing to give my govt the benefit of the doubt on issues such as this.

This the same govt that was "having the intelligence aligned to support the attack on Iraq", thats another way of sying theyre cooking the data
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:48 pm
farmerman wrote:
Quote:
I'm willing to give my govt the benefit of the doubt on issues such as this.

This the same govt that was "having the intelligence aligned to support the attack on Iraq", thats another way of sying theyre cooking the data


If you say something enough people will beleive it, "having the intelligence aligned to support the attack on Iraq". You should really try soing some reaearch prior to 2000 and see what you come up with.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:51 pm
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
I absolutely would object as strongly.


and let me add that it would strain both my trust and my liking of the person who did it no matter how much I liked them previous.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 08:52 pm
farmerman wrote:
Quote:
I'm willing to give my govt the benefit of the doubt on issues such as this.

This the same govt that was "having the intelligence aligned to support the attack on Iraq", thats another way of sying theyre cooking the data


First of all, it's not about giving "my government the benefit of the doubt." It's about suborning the Constitution which guarantees me freedom and privacy in my personal effects absent a court order. Given a choice between safety which is achieved by a limitation on some of my freedoms and freedom at the cost of safety, I will choose the latter every time. I'm not particularly afraid of terrorists; I'm terrified of my own government at this stage in history. Secondly, I totally agree with farmerman on this -- give the benefit of the doubt to a government which cooks the data until it is well done? I think not.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 09:00 pm
From the Yahoo Link BVT provided in first post:

Quote:
Roberts' planned bill also would make it easier for prosecutors to use special court-approved warrants for secret wiretaps and searches of suspected terrorists and spies in criminal cases, the committee aides said.


Quote:
Wiretaps increase 19 percent in 2004


WASHINGTON (AP) - The number of secret court-authorized wiretaps across the country surged by 19 percent last year, records show. As law enforcement authorities scurried to keep apace of improving technology favored by criminals, not a single application was denied.

State and federal judges approved 1,710 applications for wiretaps of wire, oral or electronic communications last year. Four states -- New York, California, New Jersey and Florida -- accounted for three out of every four surveillance orders, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. That agency is required to collect the figures and report them to Congress.

The numbers released Thursday do not include court orders for terror-related investigations under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which reached a record 1,754 warrants last year, according to the Justice Department.

In nonterrorist criminal investigations, federally-approved wiretaps increased 26 percent in a year to 730 applications, while state judges approved 980 wiretaps, an increase of 13 percent....

Officials said most applications, some 1,308, were for drug investigations, while racketeering or gambling wiretaps accounted for a combined 128 wiretaps.


Yeah, I'd say there's reason for concern.

What does the increase in wire taps have to do with terrorism?

http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/mcherald/news/nation/11522049.htm
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 May, 2005 09:48 pm
Yeh, Id heard that . Im glad you got the link there squinney. Id heard that for all the surveillance methods employed with warrants sought via "PATRIOT ACT" all of them were for drugs,n hoods ,n RICO stuff. That makes me feel all safe and warm.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 02:09 am
there's nothing patriotic about the "patriot act". the name alone should be a tip that it's just more b.s.

play that 9/11 string, man. that tune always makes 'em geddup an' dance.

and yeah, sure does seem that the p.a. brings down more dopers than bombers. (although i know a few stoners that still roll "bombers". Laughing )
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 03:41 am
Quote:
I know you are concerned about abuse, but has there been any abuse? Have there been any reports of abuse? Have people disappeared off the streets never to be seen again?


Um.... it's been in all the papers. People who somehow end up in Egypt or Syria or Jordan after being arrested in the United States and those people are just the ones we KNOW about. What's to prevent anyone disappeared from staying disappeared? For three years the prisoners at Guantanamo were not identified to any outside person, not to a court, not to a lawyer, not even to the military authorities holding them.

Joe(paging Mr. Kafka, Mr. Kafka, you have a message.)Nation
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 05:02 am
Joe Nation wrote:
People who somehow end up in Egypt or Syria or Jordan ...


hmmm. well, we know that laura is going to egypt, jordan and israel. it's george we can't seem to keep tabs on...
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 05:13 am
Don't forget the attorney from the Northwest that was snatched and sent over seas. His life was pretty much ruined. It was a real pleasant thing for his family, too from what I read.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 06:24 am
"Recipients could challenge the subpoenas in court and the Bush administration would have to report to Congress twice a year exactly how it was using this investigatory power, the aides said."

Seems like there is a check and balance here.

What exactly are you afraid of?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 06:51 am
woiyo wrote:
"Recipients could challenge the subpoenas in court and the Bush administration would have to report to Congress twice a year exactly how it was using this investigatory power, the aides said."

Seems like there is a check and balance here.

What exactly are you afraid of?


I'm afraid that with this change the burden of proof, or even of probable cause, seems to have shifted to the suspect rather than the government. That's not supposed to be how things work here. That IS however, the way things work in third world dictatorships.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 06:56 am
FreeDuck wrote:
woiyo wrote:
"Recipients could challenge the subpoenas in court and the Bush administration would have to report to Congress twice a year exactly how it was using this investigatory power, the aides said."

Seems like there is a check and balance here.

What exactly are you afraid of?


I'm afraid that with this change the burden of proof, or even of probable cause, seems to have shifted to the suspect rather than the government. That's not supposed to be how things work here. That IS however, the way things work in third world dictatorships.


That is a "whine", not an answer.

They can challange the subpoena in court. They will report to Congress twice a year. Abuse of this power will be checked by Congress AND the courts.

What is it exactly that you are afraid of?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 May, 2005 06:58 am
If the CIA or the FBI comes busting into your home and you are held indefinitely without formal charges or anyone knowing where you are I woiuld think that would make challenging a subpoena in court a bit problematic.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » They're Finally Doing It...And It's About Time
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.34 seconds on 10/04/2024 at 01:25:45