OMG! CONDI (and BUSH & Now SCOTT) Still Thinks IRAQ = 9/11

Lash wrote:

JTT-

The facts are messages and offers of assistance were passed between SH and OBL.

Their relationship, real or imagined, was not the sole reason the war occurred.

The fact is that he forced inspectors to wait around in front of facilities while quite large trucks took off behind those facilities.

The fact is an Iraqi scientist was dragged screaming for help from a UN caravan by SH's goons.

The fact is SH had WMDs previously.

The facts do mean something to me. Do they mean anything to you?

No one has said they're conclusive. But, they are not to be ignored, either.

You don't invade sovereign countries based on lies and concocted info. You don't kill thousands of innocents under false pretenses. You don't switch stories at your convenience. You don't defend these same things unless you are seriously delusional.

parados wrote:

Lash wrote:

JTT-

The facts are messages and offers of assistance were passed between SH and OBL.

Their relationship, real or imagined, was not the sole reason the war occurred.

The fact is that he forced inspectors to wait around in front of facilities while quite large trucks took off behind those facilities.

The fact is an Iraqi scientist was dragged screaming for help from a UN caravan by SH's goons.

The fact is SH had WMDs previously.

The facts do mean something to me. Do they mean anything to you?

No one has said they're conclusive. But, they are not to be ignored, either.

If the facts mean something perhaps you could provide your evidence of these facts occurring in 2001 or 2002. I think you just like to make up "facts" then whine that we haven't proved them untrue yet.

One problem with coming in late and wrong--you have to read back.

Meanwhile, you yap for proof a lot for someone who runs off with his tail between his legs when somebody gives him proof.

You have unfinished business elsewhere.

Good God, parados.

You've got a LOT of reading to do.

Bush hasn't been President for 12 years...?

LOL.

LOL!!! (And, that was a loud one.) Your attack to reasoned response ratio is FAR higher than mine.

I simply asked you a question.

Which of these:
The facts are messages and offers of assistance were passed between SH and OBL.

Their relationship, real or imagined, was not the sole reason the war occurred.

The fact is that he forced inspectors to wait around in front of facilities while quite large trucks took off behind those facilities.

The fact is an Iraqi scientist was dragged screaming for help from a UN caravan by SH's goons.

The fact is SH had WMDs previously.

is a lie or concocted info?

And-- you asked me for proof of something on another thread--and disappeared when I brought it.

---------------------
Again, you accuse me of "making up facts" and whining when they aren't proven untrue.

Since you have a habit of running off after someone has produced evidence, make your specific accusation before I waste anymore time on you.

Which is the lie or concocted info? Can you give a straight answer?

The relationship was imagined and it was one of the reasons claimed for going to war. Not being the sole reason doesn't invalidate it having been claimed.

When did this happen leading up to the war? I don't know of any instance of this in 2003.

and the fact is those WMD were destroyed by UNSCOM. Evidence he had them in 1988 isn't evidence he had them in 2003.

Yes. They were cohorts. They both had a common enemy at the time, and as people with common enemies will do--they worked together.

Like Saddam and OBL did more recently.

So where does the 911 Commission report state that Saddam and OBL worked together? My copy of it doesn't appear to state that anywhere.

Does it not help when I BOLD your factually false statement when I specifically quote it?

Go ahead and be as snippy as you want. It doesn't matter much to me. I can read just fine.

I cited 2 instances. One I quoted. The other was an entire series of statements on your part. I think you understand full well what it was.

In case you need to go back and read it again. I never stated that any of the items I quoted from your prior post were untrue. I only requested evidence that they happened in the last few years. Then I said I think you make up "facts" and whine about them. I have now cited two of those "facts" you made up and are whining about.

Your understanding is correct, Miss Wabbit.

Yes. They were cohorts. They both had a common enemy at the time, and as people with common enemies will do--they worked together.

Like Saddam and OBL did more recently.

My understanding is that it specifically said there was NO evidence they had worked together.

Your understanding is correct, Miss Wabbit.

Setanta wrote:

Your understanding is correct, Miss Wabbit.

I don't know how many times she has stated it but you people are mincing words. She didn't say they worked together, she said their people had meetings.

Not being present at those meetings we don't know what they talked about or what type of assistance was offered one way or the other. We might never know but the fact remains that there were meetings. And that is what has been stated by Lash.