that’s really something that is that we can’t tolerate

Reply Fri 10 May, 2019 01:37 am
The speaker uses three that(s) in a row. Is it okay to you?


The fact that there are different forms and structures across agencies means that they spend a lot of time reformatting something.

The Trump administration has been extremely supportive of reducing these burdens, to unlock the talent of our researchers and not having them spend their time on these things that are unnecessary and detract from research. What we’re talking about is wasting intellectual talent, and that’s really something that is that we can’t tolerate.

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01396-z
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 353 • Replies: 5
No top replies

View best answer, chosen by oristarA
Reply Fri 10 May, 2019 10:11 am
Stylistically, it's clumsy and could have been written more deftly. I had to read it twice to get the gist of it. It isn't ungrammatical.
  Selected Answer
Reply Fri 10 May, 2019 01:28 pm
Its like "Up is with which that shall not be put". Used in a humorous sense , its not incorrect, its just purposely clumsy and pompous sounding.
Reply Fri 10 May, 2019 01:39 pm
0 Replies
Reply Fri 10 May, 2019 10:20 pm
Thank you.
0 Replies
Reply Sat 11 May, 2019 06:35 am
If that is a word-for-word quote, it is possible that it was a mid- sentence correction. -
"...something that is unacceptable."
changed to
"...something that we can't tolerate."
0 Replies

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Drs. = female doctor? - Question by oristarA
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
  1. Forums
  2. » that’s really something that is that we can’t tolerate
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/06/2020 at 07:23:53