Cycloptichorn wrote:See above.
Do you honestly think your link provides evidence connecting the deaths listed to Bush's "Bring 'em on" comment? McG's point in his above post is certainly valid.
Cyclops wrote:Daring our enemies to attack can hardly have life-saving consequences, don't you think?
Cycloptichorn
You can debate one side of that argument, and I could debate the other. Neither of us would probably have any facts supporting our positions, other than your firm conviction that the "Bring it on" comment
must have caused deaths. I could summon up the conviction to say -- just as forcefully -- that Bush's comment gave some terrorists pause, and made them think the US might not be the ninny pushovers they might have thought, and so they didn't attack the US. I don't really believe that, but I put as much credence into your view as I do for the converse. See McG's post above.
Bush's comment, while certainly not diplomatic, most certainly did not convey weakness, which is the message the terrorists are used to getting from the US. Would you have preferred something along the lines of, "
Please don't attack us again"?