cicerone imposter wrote:icant, You support this administration's management of this war in Iraq and how they have screwed up most things associated with it -
...
No I don't! I do not "support this administration's management of this war in Iraq and how they have screwed up most things associated with it."
I support only the necessity of the USA invasion of Iraq and not its conduct. I have repeatedly remarked about the administrations blunders and slow rate of progress in winning the peace. And I have repeatedly asked who in government dose anyone think can do a better job than this administration, and why do they think so?
ican711nm wrote:MEASURABLE PROGRESS
The Bush administration's solution is the seven-step course they specified in 2003. It is the course they have stayed and are staying and have repeatedly declared they will stay. Their solution is to establish a democracy in Iraq secured by the Iraqis themselves. They have completed five of the seven steps in their solution:
(1) Select an initial Iraq government to hold a first election.
(2) Establish and begin training an Iraq self-defense military.
(3) Hold a democratic election of an interim government whose primary function is to write a proposed constitution for a new Iraq democratic government.
(4) Submit that proposed constitution to Iraq voters for approval or disapproval.
(5) After approval by Iraq voters of an Iraq democratic government constitution, hold under that constitution a first election of the members of that government.
(6) Help train, as specified by the new Iraq government, an Iraq military to secure that Iraq government.
(7) Remove our military from Iraq in a phased withdrawal.
Is their progress toward their solution fast enough? NO!
Have they committed many blunders along the way? YES!
Are they making measurable progress toward their solution? YES!
Is an increase in Iraqi voter turnout of more than two-million measurable progress? YES!
Not bad for government work! Who in government would have done a better job?
Your incessant stream of falsity suggests you to be a fool and/or a fraud.
Thus far, I have received only one partial answer to my question of who better and why. Dyslexia once posted he thinks Kucinich would have done a better job, but did not say why. Dyslexia's suggestion that Kucinich would have one a better job makes no sense at all to me, since Kucinich was and is opposed to the invasion of Iraq, and has advocated our immediate withdrawal.
Who do you recommend? Why?