0
   

US AND THEM: US, UN & Iraq, version 8.0

 
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:13 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
ican't, All good questions, but a) this administration doesn't allow legal represetation for prisoners, b) we don't know how many have died since their capture, and c) nobody has a "body count" of how many were captured and put into our prisons.


Not this or any previous USA administration allows or allowed legal representation for combatant prisoners. Our constitution waves that right for combatant prisoners (e.g., in Article I. Section 9.; and in Amendment V).

If no one knows how many have died since their capture, and no one knows how many have been captured, then what are the bases of the accusations that Bush is responsible for the missing prisoners?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:15 pm
"Combatant prisoners" is your claim. Prove it.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:20 pm
Gitmo Detainee: I Am Al Qaeda

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba, Aug. 26, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CBS/AP)

"There's virtually no chance he can get a fair trial," Sundel, Bahlul's Pentagon-appointed lawyer, told CBS News Correspondent Mark Strassmann in an interview earlier this month.
Al Bahlul's father, Hamza Ahmed, told The Associated Press in previous interviews in Yemen that the family has suffered from his son's detention, both "psychologically and financially."

"He is cultured and peace-loving and he speaks English and enjoys reading and writing poetry," Ahmed said, noting his son used to send money home.

He said his son, who is married and has four children, told him in a letter that Pakistan handed him over to the Americans and that he had left Pakistan to seek medical treatment for his grandson before the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

"In his letters he told me how much he missed his wife and children. He has not committed any crimes and he hates no one," Ahmed said.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:22 pm
Comments: Enemy America
It always amuses me that every Republican assumes that everybody in Guantanamo is guilty. I suppose that fact that 40-50% are innocent is just to painful to contemplate. Those 3 British Prisoners were innocent. Who knows who else? I suppose Organizations like the Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, Amnesty International and John McCain all hate America.

You also forgot to mention the deaths in Afghanistan. I am sure you have a joke for that guy left hanging until he died of internal bleeding. Very funny.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:25 pm
emphasis added by me
cicerone imposter wrote:

...
December 26, 2005
Election Results Suggest Small Role For Sunnis in Security Forces
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr.
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Dec. 26 - Partial voting results made public today from the recent parliamentary election suggest that in contrast to the remarkable surge in Sunni Arab participation in the political process, Sunnis still have comparatively little representation in the Iraqi security forces.
...

The early voting figures are far from exact and constitute nothing like a census of the security forces. And it is impossible to know whether Sunni Arab soldiers and police officers turned out to vote to the same high degree as the overall Sunni population. A spokesman for the American military command that oversees training of the Iraqi forces also said that while he did not know the security forces' ethnic mix, he believed that there were more Sunni troops than the election data suggested.
...

Though heavy election-day turnout won Sunni Arab parties a sizable block of parliamentary seats, the Sunnis have accused the newly ascendant Shiites of widespread electoral fraud and demanded a new election. Sunnis, and some secular Shiites, have threatened to boycott the new government.
...

By contrast, while final election results won't be available for another week, Iraqi press reports have estimated that Kurds and Sunni Arabs each received perhaps 20 percent of the overall national vote for seats in the national parliament. The main Shiite political alliance is expected to take slightly less than 50 percent of the seats in parliament.

...
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:29 pm
Looks to me like measurable progress has been made.
The Iraq 2005 election dispute looks to me like our own Florida 2000 election dispute and our own Ohio 2004 election dispute.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:31 pm
Yep! Corrupt, third world, fixed elections!!

Anon
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:34 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
"Combatant prisoners" is your claim. Prove it.

Can you provide proof otherwise? I'll wait until you do before I proceed gathering my evidence that they are combatant prisoners. After all you admitted knowing nothing about their numbers.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:39 pm
icant, You support this administration's management of this war in Iraq and how they have screwed up most things associated with it - mostly under secrecy and lies perpetrated to the American Public. All we can do is depend on the UN, Doctors without Borders, and the International Red Cross to seek the truth, but people like you disbelieve what they say. You are a lost cause for democracy and the American Way.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:40 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Comments: Enemy America
It always amuses me that every Republican assumes that everybody in Guantanamo is guilty. I suppose that fact that 40-50% are innocent is just to painful to contemplate.
...

Every Republican? Define whatyou mean by Republican. How do you know?

Of what are the 40 - 50% innocent? How do you know?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 09:46 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
icant, You support this administration's management of this war in Iraq and how they have screwed up most things associated with it - mostly under secrecy and lies perpetrated to the American Public. All we can do is depend on the UN, Doctors without Borders, and the International Red Cross to seek the truth, but people like you disbelieve what they say. You are a lost cause for democracy and the American Way.


I say "you are a lost cause for democracy and the American Way."

You post accusation after accusation with either no evidence or anecdotal evidence provided by of all people the prisoners themselves. You ignore most of my questions and those you do answer, you answer with beside-the-point statements.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 10:15 pm
The evidence provided by the UN, Doctors Without Borders, and the International Red Cross are the only sources I can rely on. Not my fault you don't believe them.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 10:17 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
icant, You support this administration's management of this war in Iraq and how they have screwed up most things associated with it -
...

No I don't! I do not "support this administration's management of this war in Iraq and how they have screwed up most things associated with it."

I support only the necessity of the USA invasion of Iraq and not its conduct. I have repeatedly remarked about the administrations blunders and slow rate of progress in winning the peace. And I have repeatedly asked who in government dose anyone think can do a better job than this administration, and why do they think so?

ican711nm wrote:
MEASURABLE PROGRESS
The Bush administration's solution is the seven-step course they specified in 2003. It is the course they have stayed and are staying and have repeatedly declared they will stay. Their solution is to establish a democracy in Iraq secured by the Iraqis themselves. They have completed five of the seven steps in their solution:
(1) Select an initial Iraq government to hold a first election.
(2) Establish and begin training an Iraq self-defense military.
(3) Hold a democratic election of an interim government whose primary function is to write a proposed constitution for a new Iraq democratic government.
(4) Submit that proposed constitution to Iraq voters for approval or disapproval.
(5) After approval by Iraq voters of an Iraq democratic government constitution, hold under that constitution a first election of the members of that government.

(6) Help train, as specified by the new Iraq government, an Iraq military to secure that Iraq government.
(7) Remove our military from Iraq in a phased withdrawal.

Is their progress toward their solution fast enough? NO!
Have they committed many blunders along the way? YES!
Are they making measurable progress toward their solution? YES!
Is an increase in Iraqi voter turnout of more than two-million measurable progress? YES!


Not bad for government work! Who in government would have done a better job?


Your incessant stream of falsity suggests you to be a fool and/or a fraud.

Thus far, I have received only one partial answer to my question of who better and why. Dyslexia once posted he thinks Kucinich would have done a better job, but did not say why. Dyslexia's suggestion that Kucinich would have one a better job makes no sense at all to me, since Kucinich was and is opposed to the invasion of Iraq, and has advocated our immediate withdrawal.

Who do you recommend? Why?
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 10:21 pm
Cicerone,

Masochist! You must enjoy bashing your head against a wall!!

Anon
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 10:32 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
The evidence provided by the UN, Doctors Without Borders, and the International Red Cross are the only sources I can rely on. Not my fault you don't believe them.

What is their evidence?

Quotations from prisoners who do not want to be prisoners?

Why should I believe them?
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 10:53 pm
Ican- It is clear that Cicerone Imposter accepts evidence which is manufactured by those who are opposed to the present administration.

After all of the blah-blah is done, the only real important fact is that the Republican Party is in control of both houses of Congress, the Presidency and is appointing judges to the Appealate Courts and the all important Supreme Court who will not be activist judges.

After Bill Clinton blundered his way into causing the Democrats into losing the House and Senate, which they controlled for so many years, the Republicans became stronger, winning two presidential elections beginning in the year 2000 and, acting against all tradition, actually winning seats in the House and Senate in the off years of 2002. I predict that the Republicans will retain the majorities in the House and Senate in 2006 enabling the Republicans to continue with their agenda.

It is interesting to note that since the President has been communicating the with Public directly more frequently in the last month his personal Job Approval Rate, as measured by the Rasmussen Reports, has zoomed back up to 50%.

Good job, Ican!!!
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Dec, 2005 10:59 pm
Anyone who searches the Internet will quickly discover that "Doctors without Borders" is a left wing group based in Switzerland. Furthermore, anyone who believes anything issuing from many of the America Haters in the UN does not realize that the UN was the corrupt core of the Oil for Food program.

As Ican so sagely commented- Why should we believe the prisoners?

You may just as well believe the monster Saddam who "claims" that he has been abused by his captors--LOL
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 12:58 am
Mortkat wrote:
Anyone who searches the Internet will quickly discover that "Doctors without Borders" is a left wing group based in Switzerland.


I suggest that such a person should do his research more properly.
Might be, she/he then will get the correct answer.

Quote:
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is a private humanitarian aid organisation most recognised for its projects in war-torn regions and developing countries facing endemic disease. Created in 1971 by a small group of French doctors led by Bernard Kouchner, the organisation is known worldwide simply as MSF, except in North America, where the name Doctors Without Borders is prevalent.


Quote:
Bernard Kouchner, born on November 1, 1939 in Avignon is a French politician and a doctor. He is co-founder of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) (Doctors Without Borders) and of Médecins du Monde.
He was born to a Jewish father and a Catholic mother. His political career began as a member of the French Communist Party and he was excluded from the party in 1966. He worked as a medic for the Red Cross (Croix Rouge) in Biafra in 1968. He founded Médecins Sans Frontières in 1971, then Médecins du Monde in 1980 due to a conflict of opinion with Claude Malhuret director of MSF.

He has been in favor for a long time of the concept of Humanitarian interference. In early 2003, he pronounced himself in favour of the intervention in Iraq, as interference against dictatorship should be global, he continued to say that now the focus should be on the actual people themselves, and that they are the only ones that can say yes or no to war.
All quotes from Wikipedia
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 01:12 am
If Walter Hinteler will check, he will discover that Doctors without Borders was indeed founded in Switzerland as I stated.

Walter Hinteler is apparently not aware that the US is much farther advanced than Germany in Scholarship since any listing of Great Universities in the world shows that about 80 of the top Hundred Universities in the World are indeed found in the USA. Germany, on the other hand, lists only two or three.

The Germans, at one time, had great researchers and scientists, but they decided that they were the master race and they either chased out or killed all of their great researchers or scientists who happened to be GERMAN JEWS.

Sorry, Walter Hinteler, Germany now is just second or third rate!
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 01:43 am
Walter,

OK, time for a fact check. As usual, Mortkat is wrong!

Quote:

About MSF:
The MSF role in emergency medical aid

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is an international humanitarian aid organisation that provides emergency medical assistance to populations in danger in more than 70 countries.


MSF has been setting up emergency medical aid missions around the world since 1971.



MFS Timeline Starting in 1971

http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/aboutus/timeline.cfm

More facts which fly in the face of Mortkats dubious reality!

http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/aboutus/index.cfm

Quote:
Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is an international independent medical humanitarian organization that delivers emergency aid to people affected by armed conflict, epidemics, natural or man-made disasters, or exclusion from health care in more than 70 countries.

MSF was founded in 1971 as a nongovernmental organization to both provide emergency medical assistance and bear witness publicly to the plight of the people it assists. A private nonprofit association, MSF is an international network with sections in 19 countries.



Perhaps you should check your facts before you make such blatently false statements Dear Mortkat!!!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 07/27/2025 at 07:20:28