97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
spendius
 
  0  
Tue 4 Aug, 2009 08:00 am
Quote:
Advances in artificial intelligence promise many benefits, but scientists are privately so worried they may be creating machines which end up outsmarting " and perhaps even endangering " humans that they held a secret meeting to discuss limiting their research.


The Sunday Times.

Sounds like they lack the courage of their coinvictions the big girl's blouses.

All that misleading bullshit on these threads about scientists pursuing the facts and here they are having knee tremblings and it's only 2009.

And secret meetings too.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  0  
Tue 4 Aug, 2009 08:42 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Its sad cause I just peeked into one of his "Multi layered" posts to see what he was all bent out of shape about.

You shouldn't peek. You'll find that there's nothing quite as satisfying as a long unbroken string of "user ignored" Smile
farmerman
 
  2  
Tue 4 Aug, 2009 10:18 am
@rosborne979,
MWAAH HAHAHAHAHAAAA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h02oh5Ri4Y0

You must be assimilated into the BORG. Just repeat this several times a day.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Tue 4 Aug, 2009 03:28 pm
@rosborne979,
Obviously I'm on Ignore by ros. He's been spouting about scientific research being hindered by religious principles and there was a bunch of scientists on a chicken run. And having an all expenses paid junket in sunny California.

ros can't square the circle so it's Ignore. He's not actually in the debate but likes to pretend he is by posting about putting me on Ignore. Which is off topic. Trolling.

I bet he never lost an argument in his life. It's an impossibility with that method.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 06:43 am
Quote:
A federal judge has cleared the way for the government's seizure of a creationism theme park in Pensacola owned by a couple convicted of tax fraud.

A ruling by U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers states that the nine properties that make up Dinosaur Adventure Land as well as two bank accounts associated with the park will be used to satisfy $430,400 owed to the federal government.

Kent Hovind, who founded the park and a ministry, Creation Science Evangelism, is serving 10 years in federal prison for failing to pay the Internal Revenue Service more than $470,000 in employee taxes.

He was found guilty in November 2006 on 58 counts, including failure to pay employee taxes and making threats against investigators.
http://www.pnj.com/article/20090801/NEWS01/908010317

Is there no sacrilege, no injustice, that liberal courts will not commit in their ceaseless efforts to destroy the Christian faith?
spendius
 
  0  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 08:21 am
@blatham,
He sounds like a good old Darwinian fundamentalist to me Bernie.

It is only Christian morality which has caused him to be incarcerated. The Romans would have applauded his schemes. And no self respecting monkey would dream of proceeding in any other fashion.

And the judge is the youngest female judge in the US and has already ruled against prayer in schools. Which is a bit odd after we saw prayers said before, during and after the inauguration.

The Marquis de Sade reports an atheist who had a scheme to enrich himself, and he was already rich from war profits, which involved organising a famine.

What point are you trying to make?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  2  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 08:27 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Is there no sacrilege, no injustice, that liberal courts will not commit in their ceaseless efforts to destroy the Christian faith?

Theme park be damned, the tax man wants his due.

I can't believe Hovind claimed he was working for God, so he didn't need to pay his employee taxes. That's brilliant (if it had worked), God told me to open a Handyman business and pay no taxes... my profits would be substantially higher.
spendius
 
  0  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 09:08 am
@rosborne979,
The reason ros calls me names and has me on Ignore, the sleeping debater option, is because I respond to posts like that by asking him does he want the Christian faith destroyed--yes or no?

But I'll ask it just the same. And of Bernie too. And all the other anti-IDers.

It will give all our viewers an idea of who are the real trolls if they duck out of answering it.
farmerman
 
  2  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 09:16 am
@rosborne979,
Having a felony charge in your resume doesnt exctly open doors for Mr Hovind.

Im gonna keep watching Auctionzip.com to see when the big park dispersal auction will be. Im sure that its gonna be handled by Sotheby's or Butterfields
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 09:44 am
Dibs on Adam and Eve riding their pet dinosaurs.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 09:47 am
@spendius,
Quote:
want the Christian faith destroyed--yes or no?


Christianity and rape. And several parasites that live in the Amazon. All done away with. Hear me, oh my lord.
spendius
 
  0  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 12:01 pm
@blatham,
What power are we to be in awe of Bernie which will keep us from declaring the war of all against all, as evolution theory describes as natural.

Quote:
Again, men have no pleasure (but on the contrary a great deal of grief) in keeping company where there is no power able to overawe them all. For every man looketh that his companion should value him at the same rate he sets upon himself, and upon all signs of contempt or undervaluing naturally endeavours, as far as he dares (which amongst them that have no common power to keep them in quiet is far enough to make them destroy each other), to extort a greater value from his contemners, by damage; and from others, by the example. So that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory. The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third, for reputation. The first use violence, to make themselves masters of other men's persons, wives, children, and cattle; the second, to defend them; the third, for trifles, as a word, a smile, a different opinion, and any other sign of undervalue, either direct in their persons or by reflection in their kindred, their friends, their nation, their profession, or their name. Hereby it is manifest that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man. For war consisteth not in battle only, or the act of fighting, but in a tract of time, wherein the will to contend by battle is sufficiently known: and therefore the notion of time is to be considered in the nature of war, as it is in the nature of weather. For as the nature of foul weather lieth not in a shower or two of rain, but in an inclination thereto of many days together: so the nature of war consisteth not in actual fighting, but in the known disposition thereto during all the time there is no assurance to the contrary. All other time is peace.

Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man, the same consequent to the time wherein men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them withal. In such condition there is no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.

It may seem strange to some man that has not well weighed these things that Nature should thus dissociate and render men apt to invade and destroy one another: and he may therefore, not trusting to this inference, made from the passions, desire perhaps to have the same confirmed by experience. Let him therefore consider with himself: when taking a journey, he arms himself and seeks to go well accompanied; when going to sleep, he locks his doors; when even in his house he locks his chests; and this when he knows there be laws and public officers, armed, to revenge all injuries shall be done him; what opinion he has of his fellow subjects, when he rides armed; of his fellow citizens, when he locks his doors; and of his children, and servants, when he locks his chests. Does he not there as much accuse mankind by his actions as I do by my words? But neither of us accuse man's nature in it. The desires, and other passions of man, are in themselves no sin. No more are the actions that proceed from those passions till they know a law that forbids them; which till laws be made they cannot know, nor can any law be made till they have agreed upon the person that shall make it.


Thomas Hobbes--Leviathan.

Do you wish to be in fear and awe of the state and those MEN who command it.

Doesn't the Constitution itself exhibit the same fear as those who arm themselves, lock their doors and their chests in respect of a fear of kings and dictators. We don't trust men.

And which culture but the Christian one has since its establishment repelled all outside invaders.

I read Hobbes to better evaluate the fatuity of anti-IDers. Their posts only exhibit the softer side of it.

Is their desire to commit adultery, get divorced, procure abortions, practice artificial birth control and indulge in sodomy, without guilt, to be given priority over our continued success? They can do those things with impunity if they so wish.

And as for rape. You must be joking. An evolutionist banging on about rape to curry favour with the uneducated ladies is as silly as silly gets.

What exactly is a parasite in your scientific credo? "Show me someone who is not a parasite and I'll go out and say a prayer for him." You have been using Dylan as a status symbol I'm afraid.

But you did answer. I'll give you that.

Have you any suggestions as to how to do away with Christianity. You can do away with rape by keeping your women in closed quarters. You'll never do away with the parasites.



spendius
 
  0  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 12:09 pm
That's the sort of stuff some of our brave scientifics are afraid of reading which is why I'm on Ignore. It's trolling don't you know?
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  2  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 12:45 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Im gonna keep watching Auctionzip.com to see when the big park dispersal auction will be. Im sure that its gonna be handled by Sotheby's or Butterfields

Looking on the bright side, with only a few modifications a theme park like that could easily be converted into a fun carnival, more befitting of its cartoonish nature.
spendius
 
  0  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 02:09 pm
@rosborne979,
It's designed as a fun carnival. It's a self-indulgent conceit of ros's that the people who visit such places actually believe the exhibits are faithful replicas of previous existences. It's actually just a novelty show designed for jaded and over-surfeited urbanites to pacify their additive charged kids in for a short time when they are driving aimlessly around the countryside lining the exchequers of oil producing areas.

A bit like Dracula movies.

ros can manipulate such a conceit to pretend that only those as intelligent as he obviously is can see it for what it is and to provide himself with an excuse to blurt out more of his inane observations which he believes are an educational aid to A2Kers or whoever else is unfortunate to come within range of his presence.

He has got to be the drabbest, most obvious and boring A2Ker of all time.

0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 04:54 pm
@rosborne979,
Ive seen some pix of the contents of the Creation Museum in Ky and they have quite extensive collections of real fossils. When they go under there are several skeletons that can grace the halls of the Smitsonian. Theyd have a great story behind them. There is a chunk of a T Rex from Hell Creek. Maybe some real scientists could extract soft tissue by the methods used in the specimen that gunga snork insists is evidence of a "Young Earth".
spendius
 
  0  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 05:08 pm
@farmerman,
Come back gunga effemm pleads.

He likes targets half an inch from his pop gun. They are the only ones he can hit assuning they are ten foot wide.

Are these "real fossils" authenticated and peer reviewed or are you just asserting that they are real in order to give your ridiculous point a smidgin of quasi-scientific veracity in the consciousness of the under10s.

They say that pictures can't lie if you don't want them to.

And isn't a fascination with skeletons a sub branch of necrophilia?

And I will draw a discrete veil over "soft tissue". I know what an exciting phrase it is to marrowbone jelly fanatics.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 05:11 pm
Has anybody plotted the ratio of replies to views on this thread since I entered the lists?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 05:39 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Have you any suggestions as to how to do away with Christianity. You can do away with rape by keeping your women in closed quarters. You'll never do away with the parasites.

I'm afraid we're stuck with the works of them. The power of prayer isn't what it used to be. But there seems a rough circular justice in knowing that is has certainly been the case, here and there, now and again, that Christians with parasites have been brutally raped.
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Thu 6 Aug, 2009 05:58 pm
@blatham,
Laughing
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 07/19/2025 at 01:57:52