Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

@Lightwizard,

LW...you are so full of **** on this one...it amazes me.

I hope you finally get your head out of your ass and see what has transpired here. I'm not holding out that much hope...I think you have become stone headed as the other two.

1 Reply

Frank says it doesn't have to make any sense if he's pushing the idea.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

You know this is just another argument over semantics. We'd love to read each other's minds, but, so far, that's not possible.

I apologize for the flippant sarcasm, but it's better than flinging epithets like mud pies. The only one who gets dirty is the deliverer.

BTW, there's more than two more -- you've lost track. There's net medication for that.

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

Quote:

Frank says it doesn't have to make any sense if he's pushing the idea.

Tell me what is wrong with "my idea."

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

What time is it back there? Isn't it past your bedtime?

1 Reply

@Lightwizard,

Quote:

You know this is just another argument over semantics. We'd love to read each other's minds, but, so far, that's not possible.

This is NOT arguing about semantics. I can give you links to each stage of the development of this controversy...and I have been consistent and logical.

These assholes keep saying there is something wrong with my thesis...but none of them has been able to poke even a single hole in it. They keep going back to the IDer bullshit.

IF THERE IS A GOD...THERE IS AN INTELLIGENT DESIGNER...AND IF THERE IS AN INTELLIGENT DESIGNER...THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF Intelligent Design.

That is all I have ever ******* asserted...and that is absolutely unassailable.

I have specifically stated that the design DOES NOT HAVE TO BE ANYTHING LIKE THE **** THE IDers are trying to sell....but can be exactly what Darwin has uncovered.

The jerkoffs fighting against it are truly nothing more than jerkoffs.

In fact, out of respect for some very nice jerkoffs I know...I gotta admit that they actually have to make significant improvement to become jerkoffs.

And if you identify with them, Lightwizard...you are jerkoff also.

0 Replies

@Lightwizard,

Quote:

BTW, there's more than two more -- you've lost track. There's net medication for that.

Quote:

What time is it back there? Isn't it past your bedtime?

Obviously you are a ******* asshole just like them. Sorry I was leaving you out. Hope, at times, is a bad thing.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Aside from being childish and silly? There have been some very good answers that cover your entire foolish assertions already. Since you apparently lack reading comprehension, I see no good in carrying on, which is why I am dropping out of the argument for a time.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Frank wants to know whats wrong with his assertion.

O.K. Lets suppose 1. there is a possibility of a God ...and lets suppose that this God is 2. "an intelligent designer". Then we must consider also 3.the possibility that this God did not design "life"...it may have had no designer or it may be that "God" is an non-interventionist deity (after Cuppitt the Anglican writer).4. And even if there were a designer this could have been alien from the Q dimension.

Since scientists have presented evidence against design then 3. follows, and whether a hypotheical God is or isn't a designer is irrelevant.

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

Quote:

Aside from being childish and silly? There have been some very good answers that cover your entire foolish assertions already. Since you apparently lack reading comprehension, I see no good in carrying on, which is why I am dropping out of the argument for a time.

Thanks, Edgar...you are a bore.

And I have not seen one comment that would poke a hole in anything I have asserted. Not one.

1 Reply

@fresco,

Quote:

O.K. Lets suppose 1. there is a possibility of a God ...and lets suppose that this God is 2. "an intelligent designer".

Okay, let's do that.

Quote:

Then we must consider also 3.the possibility that this God did not design "life"...it may have had no designer or it may be that "God" is an non-interventionist deity

Yes we could...and of course, that is what I did...when I said “...then there is the POSSIBILITY of Intelligent Design.”

Or are you too ******* stupid to understand the English language?

Quote:

or it may be that "God" is an non-interventionist deity (after Cuppitt the Anglican writer).4. And even if there were a designer this could have been alien from the Q dimension.

Indeed...which is why I said, “...the POSSIBILITY of Intelligent Design.”

Or are you too ******* stupid to understand the English language?

Quote:

Since scientists have presented evidence against design then 3. follows, and whether a hypotheical God is or isn't a designer is irrelevant.

One...they haven't presented evidence against design. They have presented evidence that evolution occurred in a particular way...randomly and through natural selection of some kind. PERHAPS THAT IS THE ******* DESIGN. How many ******* times do I have to say that to get through that ******* concrete skull of yours?

How many????

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

So you are disputing the evidence against "design" which leaves 4. the possibility of an alien from the Q dimension (or in fact several other possibilities involving hierachies of autpoietic states). Why specifically pick out "God" ?

1 Reply

@fresco,

Re-read what I actually wrote. You cannot be as ******* ignorant as you are acting here.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Just exactly what were you hoping for? Faith that I would be condescending? Come on, you're a closet theist, not an agnostic. Agnostics don't argue over their position. They just state they are agnostic and leave it at that. Anyone can understand that.

I understand your compromise between believing there is an intelligent designer (or ever was) -- I have made it clear that nobody could understand the intelligence, that religiousness has afflicted minds with the idea that any human on this Earth can answer that. It's not a theory, a hypothesis or even a belief. It's a crutch not any better or worse than seeing a psychiatrist. I think we all have times when we see that the world has gone mad and fear we will go mad even thinking about it. You're hope is not well spent with me. It doesn't matter to me -- I have family and friends that either agree of disagree with me and I'm not searching for endorsements. Least of all, yours.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Frank
Go back to Oral Roberts' church and get some fresh material. This batch is rancid.

1 Reply

@Lightwizard,

No problem...jerkoff.

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

I thought you were gone. Goddam atheists never keep their word.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

I got lonesome to be called names.

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

I have no intention re-reading high school arguments scattered with adolescent obscenities.

Your "unasailable position" was unoccupied.

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Go to bed, Frank.

0 Replies

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know