97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 04:23 pm
The term "religious education" is an oxymoron.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 04:57 pm
rl
Quote:
Government schools have been controlled by evolutionists for decades.

It is hilarious to hear them moan about 'scientific illiteracy'.


Before that time, and for almost 3/4 of the 20th century, evolution was either disallowed or ridiculed within science books. Now that we have things at the place they belong (if you want Creationism, start a charter school or a parochial schol sponsored by Evangelical Christians of Lubovitcher JEws.

Im satisfied with things the way they are now, no more slipping noses ofCreation Sciences" under the tent flap.

THis guy is a complete hoot and dead wrong on everything. HEs delusionalCREATION SCIENCE ONLINE FAIRY TALES
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 06:46 pm
Foxy wrote-

Quote:
This bears acknowledgement I think.

Why is it that as whatever could even possibly be identifiable with or have any bearing on religious faith/belief has been systematically removed from the public classroom if not actually declared taboo and this left the indoctrinators free to fill kids' heads full of pure science, etc.; yet we seem to be becoming more scientifically illiterate all the time and generally more poorly educated in all other disciplines as well.

Sorta makes my suggestion that a more open minded approach might be beneficial, eh?


Education is a business Foxy. It is run for profit.

Thus you would expect there to be a decline in standards from the point of view of those educated with other, and presumably superior, standards which are being devalued as we speak, so the speak.

All businesses seek to expand and so more custumers have to be brought into the fold and their needs have to be catered for.

Those needs are mainly associated with providing peer-reviewed facilities which allow them, when they emerge from the educational process, to present themselves as superior persons. The contingencies of the IQ graphs cannot be allowed to stand in the way of profits. That would be un-American I think.

The end result, entirely precictable, given runaway pride, is a nation of 300 million superior persons none of whom have the slightest idea about anything they talk about except that they know the buzz-word labels. And have a qualification to prove it, a cap and gown, a video and some expensively framed photographs to go on top of the telly. They can talk about Plank's theories having changed the face of advanced atomic physics but that's as far as it goes.

And shifting the **** is right out of the window as only inferior persons stoop to such occupations.

I sometimes think Foxy that you are a bit like the average AIDs-er. And average is not a word I use ironically.

You are rowing your boat ashore.

It is a different boat I'll admit.

I'm not at that game. I rowed my boat ashore years ago when I read Veblen.

He saved my life.

I tell it like it is.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 07:06 pm
spendi, Whether education is for profit or nonprofit, it helps humans understand more about ourselves, to communicate and socilize, and helps us to improve it to the extent it creates jobs that produces products and services.

Without a profit motive, we'd still be living in caves. I prefer the present living conditions.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 07:06 pm
I sometimes think that science is more fascinating than women.

Germaine Greer said that men are like carrots- cheap and plentiful and easily cooked.

That's a scientific hypothesis that I don't think Einstein would have tried to disprove.

Quote:
Einstein married Mileva on January 6, 1903, although Einstein's mother had objected to the match because she thought Marić "too old", not Jewish, and "physically defective." Their relationship was for a time a personal and intellectual partnership. In a letter to her, Einstein wrote of Marić as "a creature who is my equal and who is as strong and independent as I am." There has been debate about whether Marić influenced Einstein's work; however, most historians do not think she made major contributions. On May 14, 1904, Albert and Mileva's first son, Hans Albert Einstein, was born in Bern, Switzerland. After the death of Albert's father in 1910, Albert's second son, Eduard, was born in Munich.

Einstein and Marić divorced on February 14, 1919, having lived apart for five years. On June 2 of that year, Einstein married Elsa Löwenthal, who had nursed him through an illness. Elsa was Albert's first cousin maternally and his second cousin paternally. Together the Einsteins raised Margot and Ilse, Elsa's daughters from her first marriage. Their union produced no children.


That's enough to send anybody into orbit.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 07:13 pm
c.i. wrote-

Quote:
Without a profit motive, we'd still be living in caves. I prefer the present living conditions.


I couldn't agree more.

Why do you AIDs-ers want to rock the boat?

Are you being cut out of the profits?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 07:18 pm
spendius wrote:
c.i. wrote-

Quote:
Without a profit motive, we'd still be living in caves. I prefer the present living conditions.


I couldn't agree more.

Why do you AIDs-ers want to rock the boat?

Are you being cut out of the profits?



spendi, I've been retired since 1998, and enjoying life to the fullest - with world travel about seven times every year. I'm planning on cutting back, but look forward to enjoying life to the fullest. "Profits" will not be as lucretive as in the past, because of world economic conditions, but we've enough to weather the storm. Life has been good.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 07:27 pm
It sure has.

I have had a good look at history and I reckon that being born in a Christian country between 1935 and 1945 hit the jackpot.

I hope I am wrong.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 1 Mar, 2008 07:34 pm
No, I truly believe we've lived in the best generation, not only for Americans, but for the majority living in freedom.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 09:23 am
Foxfyre wrote:
real life wrote:
Government schools have been controlled by evolutionists for decades.

It is hilarious to hear them moan about 'scientific illiteracy'.


indoctrinators ... fill kids' heads full of pure science, etc.; yet we seem to be becoming more scientifically illiterate all the time


I wouldn't agree that the schools teach 'pure science'. And IMO that's why the sciences aren't well understood.

Evolutionary dogma is used to coerce students to accept circumstantial evidence as conclusive without allowing any hard questions or real examination of the underlying assumptions.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 09:41 am
real life wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
real life wrote:
Government schools have been controlled by evolutionists for decades.

It is hilarious to hear them moan about 'scientific illiteracy'.


indoctrinators ... fill kids' heads full of pure science, etc.; yet we seem to be becoming more scientifically illiterate all the time


I wouldn't agree that the schools teach 'pure science'. And IMO that's why the sciences aren't well understood.

Evolutionary dogma is used to coerce students to accept circumstantial evidence as conclusive without allowing any hard questions or real examination of the underlying assumptions.


Well you might be right as I believe "pure science" leaves the door open for the unexplainable to be revealed. "Pure science" would never attempt to say that something does not exist because there is no evidence for it, and then at the same time presume that the 'something that does not exist' is detrimental to people and must be forbidden.

You and Spendi may be more fundamentalist than I am. I don't know as we have not really ever gotten into the nitty gritty of religious doctrine or understandings and I may have a more favorable view of evolutionary science than either of you do. But I perceive that you have experienced the living God as have I. So we know, with no doubt whatsoever, that God is. However, as I believe the only 'proof' available that God is comes through experience. God cannot be taught scientifically and that is why I say there is no room for ID to be taught as science in science class.

Nevertheless, in closing out God as unacceptable in the learning process, we also close out much independent thought, creativity, imagination, curiosity in the unknown, as well as modification of behavior, that openness to all possibilities, including God, affords. It is for that reason that I think it would be/is detrimental to a child's science education to imply that his/her belief or understanding of God's role in the universe has no place there.

Not teaching science as ID but allowing ID to exist peacefully are not incompatible policies.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 09:45 am
FLORIDA UPDATE

Quote:
Calling evolution a 'theory' won't end debate
(By Joëlle Anne Moreno, South Florida Sun-Sentinel Opinion, March 2, 2008)

Florida's public school science standards have just been updated for the first time since 1996, and no one is happy.

Under the new standards, teachers will be required to introduce core concepts of evolution and natural selection starting in the sixth grade. High school students will study more complex aspects of evolutionary science starting in ninth grade. Although students will be told that evolution is "the fundamental concept underlying all of biology," they must also be told that evolution is a scientific theory.

No legitimate scientist can, or should, object to the classification of evolution as theory. Scientists understand that evolution is a theory because it is a unifying set of observations and measurements that have been tested repeatedly and accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. Evolution, gravity and plate tectonics are all theories.

So why object to the new requirement that public school teachers label evolution as "theory"?

There are two reasons to oppose the new mandatory characterization of evolution as theory. The first is that non-scientists often use the word "theory" to describe assumptions based on limited information or knowledge, and public school classrooms are filled with kids, not scientists. Forcing this new theory label into the science curriculum is a transparent effort to confuse our children.

In 2005, when the Cobb County School District in Georgia tried to place stickers in all biology textbooks that said "evolution is a theory, not a fact," the federal court concluded that this statement "has the effect of implicitly bolstering alternative religious theories of origin by suggesting that evolution is a problematic theory even in the field of science." Florida's new standards serve similar religious objectives by undermining Darwin's explanations of natural phenomena, which have been supported by a century of empirical evidence.

To the extent this is a war of ideas fought with words, Florida has opened the classroom door for pseudoscientific ideology-based alternative theories for the origin of natural life, such as arguments based on irreducible complexity, creationism or "intelligent design."

The second reason to oppose the theory label is we should not teach our children that faith and reason are interchangeable. Recent polls reveal that approximately half of all Americans adults do not "believe" in evolution. When children are encouraged to discount evolution as "only" a theory, they learn to approach all science-based controversies, not with an appropriately healthy level of skepticism and critical thinking skills, but with the dangerous and profound misconception that belief and proof are interchangeable.

Technically, evolution is a theory and, for now, teachers will follow new Florida standards. But this debate is far from over.

School boards around the country should learn from Florida's example. Evolution is not dogma. It is, according to the late Stephen J. Gould, Harvard University's most prolific and influential evolutionary biologist and paleontologist, "one of the half dozen 'great ideas' developed by science."

Perhaps our public school teachers will accurately communicate that, to scientists, the word "theory" is not pejorative. But if they fail or refuse to do this, our children will suffer. Public schools cannot accommodate theistic, partisan and non-scientific objectives, unless we are willing to risk our commitment to the principle that church and state must remain separate and our opportunity to raise children trained to think, to think critically, and to think for themselves.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 12:40 pm
I checked the South Florida Sun-Sentinel web site's list of classified advertising and there were no Personal Services, Escort Agencies, Datelines, Massage Parlours, or anything remotely connected to sex.

I recently saw a copy of a Vancouver newspaper which had many pages of such things. Is there this amazing difference between Vancouver mores and South Florida mores?

I am inclined to think that when we-

Quote:
raise children trained to think, to think critically, and to think for themselves.


these areas of classified advertising, which of course pay very well, expand. The editorial content of newspapers rides on the back of its advertising department. If the SFS-S has no advertising relating to the matters I mentioned then it is fair to say that the editorial wande quoted isn't wrapped around with the petticoats of prostitutes.

Does anybody out there know? I can imagine that if they do carry those sections they may not include them in their web pages.

The SFS-S is owned by the Tribune group.

Quote:
TRIBUNE is America's largest employee-owned media company, operating businesses in publishing, interactive and broadcasting. In publishing, Tribune's leading daily newspapers include the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Newsday (Long Island, N.Y.), The Sun (Baltimore), South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Orlando Sentinel and Hartford Courant. The company's broadcasting group operates 23 television stations, Superstation WGN on national cable, Chicago's WGN-AM and the Chicago Cubs baseball team. Popular news and information websites complement Tribune's print and broadcast properties and extend the company's nationwide audience.


So "our" teachers and "our" kids might not be quite so scientific as it looks at first sight.

The top man is Sam Zell.

Quote:
Last week you may have encountered some colorful uses of the lexicon from Sam Zell that we are not used to hearing at the Times...But of course we still have the same expectations at the Times of what is correct in the workplace. It's not good judgment to use profane or hostile language and we can't tolerate that...In short, nothing changes; the fundamental rules of decorum and decency apply...Sam is a force of a nature; the rest of us are bound by the normal conventions of society.


Mmmmnnnn!

wande- could you post the number of column inches a newspaper you quote gives over to prostitution and allied trades and then we can more easily gauge whether their editorial line is or is not in the service of expanding this very lucrative aspect of their income.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 12:42 pm
A scientific mind couldn't think any other way than that.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 03:00 pm
spendius wrote:
I checked the South Florida Sun-Sentinel web site's list of classified advertising and there were no Personal Services, Escort Agencies, Datelines, Massage Parlours, or anything remotely connected to sex.

I recently saw a copy of a Vancouver newspaper which had many pages of such things. Is there this amazing difference between Vancouver mores and South Florida mores?
Vancouver has more.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 05:46 pm
You meant to say to Spendius : Vancouver has more, you moron.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 05:48 pm
Tell me more Chum.

What have these media enterprises to gain from amorality? It spirals out of control when you get your head on it so it is not recommended for critical thinkers.

At the azimuth of Soho prostitution a broom cupboard could be rented for 600 quid a week. So ten pages of euphemisms made out of wood pulp and ink is obviously better business.

Evolution is nothing except bridging the asymptote of amorality. Going all the way.

Complete dead loss.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 05:58 pm
Joe (I'm a genius) Nation wrote-

Quote:
Keep your word,
presume nothing,
take nothing personally,
do your best.
Run. Run for your life.


I have adhered to that wise philosophy ever since Sgt Growler explained to me what a wanker I was.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 06:03 pm
Don't take it personally, Spendius.

Your output brings nothing to this conversation.

Yet you keep keeping on.

Joe(way to go, old boy, but totally useless.)Nation
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 2 Mar, 2008 06:10 pm
Who isn't?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 07/28/2025 at 02:05:38