wandeljw wrote:foxfyre,
Your description of ID is something that can be "known" through spiritual faith only.
Evolutionary theory offers an explanation of natural processes through an examination of material evidence only. Science ignores spiritual issues. If new material evidence refutes a scientific theory, scientists correct their theory. Spiritual beliefs are not correctible in this way.
No, Wandel. Anything can be "known" or more correctly "proved" through personal experience only. Anything, including evolution and all other sciences, that is not personally experienced is believed by faith alone. If you think about it, you will know that I am right.
At the same time I am not saying that ID is anything like science. ID is not testable in the same way that science is testable. These are two totally different concepts that coexist separately at the same time but are not comparable. For this reason I and most IDers do not agree to ID being taught as science. But because for most of us, ID is learned through personal experience, we also will not agree to science teachers dismissing ID as invalid or unbelievable.
Again that's all I ask. Science teachers should teach science as well as science can be known and taught. Science teachers should not presume to teach the concepts of ID and that includes dismissing it as invalid.