97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 01:12 pm
spendius wrote:
Of course it is valid wande.


I had asked you if the question was "honest". In my opinion, the senator's question is rhetorical.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 01:19 pm
I have seen many a rhetorical question answered by jeers, catcalls and booings.

It is an honest question and if Ms Seivers is honest she will provide an answer. And be happy to.

And if she is dishonest, as these high positions in affairs seems to necessitate, is she qualified to hold her position?
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 01:49 pm
spendius wrote:
I have seen many a rhetorical question answered by jeers, catcalls and booings.

It is an honest question and if Ms Seivers is honest she will provide an answer. And be happy to.

And if she is dishonest, as these high positions in affairs seems to necessitate, is she qualified to hold her position?


The Tennessee attorney general has characterized the senator's question in this way: "the resolution clearly appears to constitute a rhetorical device designed to advocate the teaching of creationism as an alternative to the theory of evolution...."
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 02:59 pm
That's squirming wande and thus pathetic.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 03:02 pm
I agree, spendi. The senator's question is squirming and pathetic.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 03:09 pm
Not at all. It is not only a reasonable question but one might say the ONLY question. You answer it. Are we just a random happening of no consequence and with neither meaning or purpose. As I intimated earlier many have said yes to it.

I have an essay in my noggin on the business of assertions such as the AG's and your's but it requires a lengthy quote which I will have to type out so I need to wait for the time and the red rag to wave.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 03:27 pm
spendi
Quote:
Are we just a random happening of no consequence and with neither meaning or purpose
. You misunderstand the use of "random". Life isnt simply a "random occurence". Life's chemicals are like the predictable outcome of card counting in blackjack. What may start out as a purely random event, limits the outcomes of a succeeding event, and so on, so an ultimate outcome is eventually even predictable(given enough Hydrogen, Oxygen, Carbon, Phosphorus,and Nitrogen), and making sure that your concerns for the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, dont violate the 1st.

As far as meaning and purpose, isnt that up to each of us ?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 03:29 pm
Quote:
so I need to wait for the time and the red rag to wave.
In American English you have just told us that youre menstruating.

Somebody alert the media.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 04:26 pm
Get me an agent quick. And a publicist. And an attorney.

I'm on easy street. I've always wanted some lingerie.

Random means anything over which human intelligence has no control. Like monkey geneologies in the wild. Something of a function of nature's infinite whims.

We have a random number selector for our Premium Bond raffle and our National Lottery (to our shame) because if human intelligence had any control over it we all know what would happen. Some think it is already happening and sneer when they hear the word "random" used to describe the electronic and bouncing balls methods.

Human intelligence invented the word random and the mathematical concept of randomness which the Greeks didn't have.

You are wriggling again fm.

We are not interested in what meaningless means to any individual. We are interested, or should be, in what it means to a society of 300 million people when fully accepted and fully operational with no cultural drag for its proponents to hide in. What are the social consequences, following logical sequences of thought, given what we know of human nature in a world they all know to have no meaning.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 04:42 pm
Quote:
Random means anything over which human intelligence has no control. Like monkey geneologies in the wild
. "You are the weakest link" goodbye.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:09 pm
An assertion plus a scuttering off. Seen it many times.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:12 pm
Im standing, youre incorrect. You scutter off to find a dictionary.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:15 pm
You said "goodbye" fm. I understand that to have meant you are leaving us. Was I mistaken? I hope so.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:19 pm
It is profoundly naive to think that Intellligent Design Theory has any scientific standing.
It is delusional to see any indication that Nature is less than indifferent to its own processes. And, hypothetically, IF Nature has "purpose", how could we possibly perceive and understand it? Can the attribution of teleology to Nature be other than anthropomorphic projection?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:31 pm
Quote:
You said "goodbye" fm.
Yes, As in "The weakest Link" the hostess announces to the dummy of the moment that "You are the weakest link--goodbye" Then that person leaves the stage with deflated ego and a vow to revenge themselves.
Take my comment in that vein.


jl
Quote:
Can the attribution of teleology to Nature be other than anthropomorphic projection?
. Is this gonna be on the test? Im an art major so I shouldnt have to know stuff like this.

IIlike to make bumper stickers out of smart phrases.So heres JL's statement to fit on your car.
"IS everything about us?" Ya know, this could make a neat thread.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:34 pm
How wonderful, Farmer, that you understand me better than I do.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:40 pm
I send you a virtual ST Patties day Card. JL.

painting up a storm are you? we need another artists bullshit thread.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:52 pm
fm wrote-

Quote:
Yes, As in "The weakest Link" the hostess announces to the dummy of the moment that "You are the weakest link--goodbye" Then that person leaves the stage with deflated ego and a vow to revenge themselves.
Take my comment in that vein.


Well fm, I didn't know you watched shite like that. I'll have to make allowances.

Quote:
Im an art major


Perhaps that is true but it doesn't necessarily have anything to do with art.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Thu 15 Mar, 2007 11:19 pm
FM: "we need another artists bullshit thread."
Yes, indeed. I havn't talked about art on A2K for some time now. It does seem, however, that the more I involve myself in actual painting, the less I feel able to talk sensibly about the process. Nevertheless, there are so many of you with artistic sophistication that I do not want to pass up the opportunity for learning from you. Make up a topic, will you?
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Fri 16 Mar, 2007 05:22 am
A2K received news yesterday that timber died suddenly on March 3.

Timberlandko Rest In Peace
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 01/03/2025 at 08:41:46