97
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 01:07 pm
I want to publicly offer my thanks to the Ginril (Farmerman to the less visually perceptive among us) for sparking my interest in the history of this nonsense. I am indebted to him, because tracking down the sources of ideas and events is what i am good at, and what i was once trained for, and what i have pursued for a life time.

I call this nonsense, not because is there isn't a real danger here--there is, and what is endangered is the quality of education in this country. I call it nonsense, because if the IDers have their way, nonsense is what will replace the teaching of science.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 01:47 pm
georgeob wrote between bites of a raw potato:
Quote:
On the other side of the argument, it is wrong for Blatham to fault you for a lack of objectivity, while implicitly claiming it for himself, as he did in this rather elegant sentence.
blatham wrote:
If you hold, as does Adele, that certain elements of your faith are true a priori and true absolutely (God created the universe, Jesus is divine and the Bible is the Revealed Word) then you immediately forfeit any claim to epistemological objectivity. Only one conclusion is available to you - there was a Designer and He is God. All other conclusions and all hypotheses/evidences pointing elsewhere MUST BE false, ipso facto. The universe WILL and MUST, inevitably, demonstrate the truth of your assumption regarding this Creator.

Atheism is just as much a faith in an a priori and absolute principle as is evangelical Protestantism, and its effects on the presumed objectivity of the holders, the same.


george...you capitalist running dog Irish swine

As incontrovertibly evidenced here, the enviable quality of 'elegance' is not limited to sentence construction alone.

Once again, we find you piloting dangerously astray. Perhaps your neck is craned habitually to port from the weight of that old albatross carcass.

Where a fundamental proposition is held as absolutely true and without possibility of being false, then it must be considered that objectivity [noun: judgment based on observable phenomena and uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices] is absent. You seem to have this notion in good grasp and I give you a comradly pat on the buttocks for that.

However, you go on to suggest that my stance places me in the same category. Yet, even after all these years of semi-profitable discussion, I have yet to clarify my actual stance to you, or to anyone here. Let me procede to do that now. I don't have a stance (though with those new pants, I'm tempted). I'm waiting to make that decision. You are familiar, I know, with Voltaire's deathbed statement when asked by the attending priest whether he was now finally prepared to renounce the devil and Voltaire replied, "This is no time to be making new enemies."

I have no investment towards faith or against faith. The question is of little interest to me and will in any case be sorted out in due course. If, the next time my heart stops beating, I am moved to finally adopt a stance, you shall be one of the first to know.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 02:03 pm
Setanta wrote:
I want to publicly offer my thanks to the Ginril (Farmerman to the less visually perceptive among us) for sparking my interest in the history of this nonsense. I am indebted to him, because tracking down the sources of ideas and events is what i am good at, and what i was once trained for, and what i have pursued for a life time.

I call this nonsense, not because is there isn't a real danger here--there is, and what is endangered is the quality of education in this country. I call it nonsense, because if the IDers have their way, nonsense is what will replace the teaching of science.


And sometimes, the Irish get it exactly right.

A tip o' the cap to farmerperson here, to setanta, and to Lola. It's an important fight and I'm pleased to enjoy the sort of company these folks represent. Even george, bobbing along far over to the side like some carelessly-roped Polynesian ama, makes the trip that much more enjoyable.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 02:56 pm
blatham wrote:


And sometimes, the Irish get it exactly right.

I suspect that Setanta is more Scottish than Irish. He has the hot temper to be sure, and an evident taste for lyric metaphor as well. However a bit dour and angry. I can piss him off at will.

Quote:
Even george, bobbing along far over to the side like some carelessly-roped Polynesian ama ...
How left-handed can you get?

I have read of the last of Voltaire's bon mots. However overall, I have found him to be a disagreeable figure. I prefer Paschal and his metaphysical bet.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 03:00 pm
Edited in recognition of the courteous and well-bred response of the offending and offended party.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 03:03 pm
I shall be loaning neither of you money.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 03:05 pm
You know, Bubba Latham, i've about had it with your witless Mennonite Irish-bashing. Your pretentions to intellectual superiority are ludicrous enough on their own, but that sort of constant snottiness about an entire nation simply points up your ignorant, rural Protestant bigotry. Next time you feel the urge to slander the Irish welling up in you, why don't you shove it up your pietistic, anal-retentive ass.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 03:07 pm
Edited to remove evidence of a contempt negated by a well-bred, courteous response. At this time, my contempt for the Mountie is in no way diminished.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 03:31 pm
QED.

This, however was not my intent, which was more in the vein of friendly needling.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 04:05 pm
georgeob, this is just how they greet each other. Pay no attention.If it doesnt come to blows, its been a great day. If it does come to blows , we just hang on to our beers and make bets.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 04:37 pm
farmerman wrote:
PS, Craven , I aint doing anything illegal here because the summary judgement motion was already on the web for about a week now. Im just conveying it from one site to another.

the u.s. district court for middle pennsylvania has its own website and makes some documents electronically available to the oublic
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 04:37 pm
Between Set and blatham, it's about even money.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 04:55 pm
Quote:
Atheism is just as much a faith in an a priori and absolute principle as is evangelical Protestantism, and its effects on the presumed objectivity of the holders, the same.


george,

are you still singing this tired ole song? You sweet darling. The belief in the validity of science (based on logic and the scientific method) is not the same as blind faith. There are those who make good use of blind faith while still respecting science. And the reverse is the same. The difference, which I've said now a hundred times, is that one is based on faith, without logical method and the other is based belief and respect, with logical processes. The belief in a religious explanation of reality is not the same kind of belief as believing because it's been demonstrated to you. Do I make myself clear?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 05:11 pm
If you've said a "hundred times" Lola are you implying that George hasn't been listening.

My mum often said -"spendi,if I've told you once I've told you etc etc".
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 05:19 pm
No Spendi, that was me with my finger waggin. Now Spendi.........you should listen to me.

And yes, I'm saying that on this subject, in contrast to george's abilities to listen and understand about other subjects, george never listens. It rolls over him like a steam roller over a flea......and up he pops again, unaffected and repeating.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 05:24 pm
Suppose he knows something you don't.

Mums don't know everything about little lads you know.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 05:41 pm
suppose he doesn't? He's offered nothing new for years on this one. If he knows something I don't know on this subject, it would be great if he got on with demonstrating exactly what it is.

And mums know a lot......some of us more than others
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 05:51 pm
It might not be as great as you seem to think.It might be something he doesn't think you are ready for.

I know that mums know a lot and that some know more than others but nevertheless they don't know everything about little lads.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 06:18 pm
but spendi........george isn't a little lad he's a big daddy and you're not such a lad yourself......

sometimes you're full of it, Spendi
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sun 28 Aug, 2005 06:21 pm
Sometimes ? ! ? ! ?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 03/14/2025 at 09:19:08