Quote: According to all polls anti-ID is contrarian. What do you know about me. You have told us plenty about yourself and all of it either directly or tangentially self complimentary.
It's one long assertion and never even an attempt to answer any points.
Like booing.
1. Why should I beat myself up over something like you spendi? Youve been using your posts to divert most of us away from subjects at hand. If you dont even have a smidgeon of a clue, then look up "loon"
2Ive always answered points that seemed credible or arguments from a POV. I avoid your stuff because its flatulence that merely passes your hyoid and isnt usually relevant. Like your statement
Quote:I am always trying to get you back to the subject in hand. The classroom say, the staff room, M.La Mettrie now. He is your founder.
That statement alone proves to me that you are either somewhat demented or are a pathological liar. You were the one who brought up la Mettrie up as some kind of attempt at a lame argument (on what, Im not certain, Since your personal neologism of "anti-ID" has no reference in fact). You notice that noone bit at this .
Even the Creationists and many of the IDers produce topical questions and comments that, while often repetetive, arent meant with an evil intent as some kind of masturbatory game as yours .
You are really a pathetic soul {cf. Webster's 20th Century, unabridged (def no.7)}. Always seeking attention, and not very well might I submit.
However, likemost nonsense, there is something weirdly attention getting about your posts, like a car crash with guys in clown suits
