Flaubert's stunning metaphor of Hippolyte's club foot at the mercy of the posturing half-baked scientist brigade in Madame Bovary springs to mind.
But I seem to be dealing here with people who don't think it is necessary to engage with things like that before preaching about an educational system for a nation of 300 million. It's as if they think Flaubert sweated blood just to write a story.
Have you not noticed the increase in Aphrodities as religious sentiment has declined. They will be reopening Her temples before long.
Anti-IDers have this simple notion, it has to be simple you see, that IDers are idiots and that's all there is to it. Grappling with the FACT that it is much more complex is avoided for obvious reasons.
That can be dismissed with a snide remark or better a long,continuous flow of them all equally valid as they are all meaningless.
It's effortless. It seeks to reduce the debate to the level of a bar.
Look at this-
Quote:Whether or not his quotes have any meaning, thats another thing entirely.
It says nothing but gives the impression the brother-in-law is stupid after the "drunk" smear which may or may not be true and if it is fm's wife comes from the same stable. I don't recall ever quoting Lincoln but I have quoted Galbraith in my time. He is one of the chosen. His words do have meaning so the "another thing entirely" (the cheap sarcasm) is fm's problem. Mt Galbraith was an educated gentleman.
If you would care to provide any quotes from your brother-in-law fm I'll have a go at explaining them for you.
ros- I wouldn't attempt to solve the puzzle if I was you. I would get some serious reading done first. 10 years should get you started.