Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

I think people who only focus on the history of great men are probably from that section of the population,thankfully not too large,who believe that they,by rights,ought to be great men themselves.

Can you locate a copy of the Bill itself. There seems to be some disagreement on what it actually does/says.

LRB-2463 Pseudo-Science Prevention Act
This bill would only allow material to be taught as science in public school science courses if it:
1.is testable as a scientific hypothesis
2.describes only natural processes
3.is consistent with any description or definition of science adopted by the National Academy of Sciences

The bill would still allow intelligent design and creationism to be taught in non-science courses, such as comparative religion, social sciences, philosophy, and even history of science.

Intelligent design or creationism may still be taught in science courses, as long as it is not presented as science, but rather as an example of non-science.

But creationism and intelligent design would not be permitted to be presented as science in Wisconsin public school science courses.

Berceau said only one person in an e-mail called her a "communist" and an "atheist."

That statement reminds me a lot of the repeated implications you make about people who *talk* about science when they don't actually *understand* science, just to make themselves appear smart.

This seems to be a recurring theme with you. You just seem to think that most people are blowhards who want to make themselves look good by association with non-blowhards.

Why do you think you feel that way?

Documentation, please.

Do your own digging.

Hey Francis!Even a scientist would draw the line at some of that lot.But only on the grounds of efficiency.Nothing moral obviously.

hell spendi is a vast petri dish of useless linguistics. Well maybe not fully vast, only half.